Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fairness Doctrine hammered 309-115
The Hill ^ | June 28, 2007 | Alexander Bolton

Posted on 06/28/2007 3:54:50 PM PDT by rface

At the end of Thursday’s debate, Democratic House Appropriations Committee Chairman David Obey (Wis.) agreed with Republicans that the government should not regulate conservative radio hosts such as Limbaugh and Hannity......“We ought to let right-wing talk radio go on as they do now,” he said. “Rush and Sean are just about as important in the scheme of things as Paris Hilton.......”

The House voted overwhelmingly Thursday ( June 28, 2007 )to prohibit the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) from using taxpayer dollars to impose the Fairness Doctrine on broadcasters who feature conservative radio hosts such as Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity.

By a vote of 309-115, lawmakers amended the Financial Services and General Government appropriations bill to bar the FCC from requiring broadcasters to balance conservative content with liberal programming such as Air America.

The vote count was partly a testament to the influence that radio hosts wield in many congressional districts.

It was also a rebuke to Democratic senators and policy experts who have voiced support this week for regulating talk radio.

House Democrats argued that it was merely a Republican political stunt because there is little danger of the FCC restricting conservative radio while George W. Bush is president.

Republicans counter that they are worried about new regulations if a Democrat wins the White House in 2008.

Senate Majority Whip Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) said on Tuesday that the government should revive the Fairness Doctrine, a policy crafted in 1929 that required broadcasters to balance political content with different points of view.

“It’s time to reinstitute the Fairness Doctrine,” he said. “I have this old-fashioned attitude that when Americans hear both sides of the story, they’re in a better position to make a decision.”

Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), chairwoman of the Senate Rules Committee, said this week that she would review the constitutional and legal issues involved in re-establishing the doctrine.

Sen. John Kerry (Mass.), the Democratic Party’s 2004 presidential nominee, also said recently that the Fairness Doctrine should return.

In 1985 the FCC discarded the policy after deciding that it restricted journalistic freedom and “actually inhibit[ed] the presentation of controversial issues of public importance to the detriment of the public and in degradation of the editorial prerogative of broadcast journalists,” according to a Congressional Research Service report.

Thursday, the House firmly rejected the prospect of requiring balanced views on talk radio.

Before the passage of the amendment, which he sponsored, Rep. Mike Pence (R-Ind.), a former full-time radio host, forecast a big majority and took a shot at the Senate, saying: “This House will say what some in the other body are not saying, that we believe in freedom on the airwaves. We reject the doctrines of the past that would have this federal government manage political speech on the public airwaves.”

Republican Study Committee Chairman Jeb Hensarling (R-Texas) and Rep. Jeff Flake (R-Ariz.) also sponsored the legislation.

Conservatives fear that forcing stations to make equal time for liberal talk radio would slash profits and pressure radio executives to scale back on conservative programming to avoid escalating costs and interference from government regulators. Opponents of the Fairness Doctrine argue that radio stations would suffer financially if forced to air liberal as well as conservative programs because liberal talk radio has not proven popular or profitable. For example, Air America, liberals’ answer to “The Rush Limbaugh Show” and Michael Medved, filed for bankruptcy in October.

House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-Ohio) said Thursday that listeners should be able to decide if they want to hear different political arguments.

“The best way is to let the judgment of the American people decide, and they can decide with their finger,” Boehner said. “[People] can turn it off or they can turn it on. They can go to their computer and read it on the Internet.”

Flake added: “Rather than having the government regulate what people can say, we should let the market decide what people want to hear. That’s precisely why the Fairness Doctrine was abandoned, and that’s why it ought not to be revived.”

At the end of Thursday’s debate, Democratic House Appropriations Committee Chairman David Obey (Wis.) agreed with Republicans that the government should not regulate conservative radio hosts such as Limbaugh and Hannity.

“We ought to let right-wing talk radio go on as they do now,” he said. “Rush and Sean are just about as important in the scheme of things as Paris Hilton, and I would hate to see them gain an ounce of credibility by being forced by a government agency or anybody else to moderate their views enough that they might become modestly influential or respected.”


TOPICS: Breaking News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 110th; censorship; congress; fairnessdoctrine; fcc; firstamendment; govwatch; silenceamerica; talkradio; vampirebill
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-239 next last

1 posted on 06/28/2007 3:54:51 PM PDT by rface
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rface
“I have this old-fashioned attitude that when Americans hear both sides of the story, they’re in a better position to make a decision.”

We coulda used this numbnut during the omnibus amnesty debate.

2 posted on 06/28/2007 3:57:27 PM PDT by Libloather (That's just what I need - some two-bit, washed up, loser politician giving me weather forecasts...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rface

“Rush and Sean are just about as important in the scheme of things as Paris Hilton, and I would hate to see them gain an ounce of credibility by being forced by a government agency or anybody else to moderate their views enough that they might become modestly influential or respected.”

Now, THERE is one delusional individual!


3 posted on 06/28/2007 3:57:30 PM PDT by vetsvette (Bring Him Back)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rface

“This House will say what some in the other body are not saying, that we believe in freedom on the airwaves. We reject the doctrines of the past that would have this federal government manage political speech on the public airwaves.”

Heard him say this on Levin’s show last evening. Pence is a great American!


4 posted on 06/28/2007 3:58:54 PM PDT by gidget7 ( Vote for the Arsenal of Democracy, because America RUNS on Duncan!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rface
Wow!

Did the peoples' voice resound in Washington?


Maybe the Washington politicians are getting the message that the American people are mad as hell and we still own this nation.
5 posted on 06/28/2007 3:59:11 PM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vetsvette

Let him keep his delusions. It’ll only help us.


6 posted on 06/28/2007 4:00:08 PM PDT by The Blitherer (What would a Free Man do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rface
Shazam
7 posted on 06/28/2007 4:00:21 PM PDT by Jaysun (It's like people who hate corn bread and hate anchovies, but love cornchovie bread.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vetsvette
“Rush and Sean are just about as important in the scheme of things as Paris Hilton, . . .

What role did Paris play in today's Senate Cloture vote?


Yeah, that's what I thought.

8 posted on 06/28/2007 4:00:58 PM PDT by SmithL (si vis pacem, para bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rface

3 losses for the rats today, fairness,cheney funding and amnesty, being a majority sucks haha


9 posted on 06/28/2007 4:01:04 PM PDT by italianquaker ("blue dog democrats", that dog don't hunt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rface

I can’t even believe that this subject was being debated!!


10 posted on 06/28/2007 4:01:14 PM PDT by ButThreeLeftsDo (Fight Crime. Shoot Back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rface

I think what they all heard the last few weeks was “All your votes are belong to us!”


11 posted on 06/28/2007 4:01:26 PM PDT by neodad (USS Vincennes (CG-49) Freedom's Fortress)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rface
“The best way is to let the judgment of the American people decide, and they can decide with their finger,” Boehner said.

Well said, Congressman. To the democrats:


12 posted on 06/28/2007 4:01:47 PM PDT by VRWCmember
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rface

I’m surprised the House acted today on this.


13 posted on 06/28/2007 4:01:53 PM PDT by AFPhys ((.Praying for President Bush, our troops, their families, and all my American neighbors..))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rface

Looks like we got a twofer today.


14 posted on 06/28/2007 4:01:59 PM PDT by chopperman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rface

Does anyone have the roll call, or a link to it?


15 posted on 06/28/2007 4:03:37 PM PDT by puroresu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

I'd like to see a Roll Call....
16 posted on 06/28/2007 4:04:00 PM PDT by rface ("...the most schizoid freeper I've ever seen" - New Bloomfield, Missouri)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: rface
"Rush and Sean are just about as important in the scheme of things as Paris Hilton"

You just go on believing that Obey. Some of your colleagues obviously don't.

17 posted on 06/28/2007 4:04:54 PM PDT by monkeybrau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rface

Obey had to get this little cheap shot in though, comparing Rush to Hilton. Can’t face the cold fact that nobody wants to hear liberal vomit on the airwaves.


18 posted on 06/28/2007 4:05:40 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rface
"We ought to let right-wing talk radio go on as they do now,”

Sheesh. No kidding. Thanks for allowing us our God-given and first amendment guaranteed right to free speech.

19 posted on 06/28/2007 4:06:32 PM PDT by Jim Robinson (Our God-given unalienable rights are not open to debate, negotiation or compromise!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rface

well is this not a agaood day? first the immigratio thing went down to defeat and now this. I liked this quote but it is very scary as well.

“there is little danger of the FCC restricting conservative radio while George W. Bush is president.”

I wonder how our backstabber GOP Senators are going to vote on this when it goes to the Senate. Something tells me they are going to support it whether they want to or not.


20 posted on 06/28/2007 4:07:25 PM PDT by bilhosty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-239 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson