Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fairness Doctrine hammered 309-115
The Hill ^ | June 28, 2007 | Alexander Bolton

Posted on 06/28/2007 3:54:50 PM PDT by rface

At the end of Thursday’s debate, Democratic House Appropriations Committee Chairman David Obey (Wis.) agreed with Republicans that the government should not regulate conservative radio hosts such as Limbaugh and Hannity......“We ought to let right-wing talk radio go on as they do now,” he said. “Rush and Sean are just about as important in the scheme of things as Paris Hilton.......”

The House voted overwhelmingly Thursday ( June 28, 2007 )to prohibit the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) from using taxpayer dollars to impose the Fairness Doctrine on broadcasters who feature conservative radio hosts such as Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity.

By a vote of 309-115, lawmakers amended the Financial Services and General Government appropriations bill to bar the FCC from requiring broadcasters to balance conservative content with liberal programming such as Air America.

The vote count was partly a testament to the influence that radio hosts wield in many congressional districts.

It was also a rebuke to Democratic senators and policy experts who have voiced support this week for regulating talk radio.

House Democrats argued that it was merely a Republican political stunt because there is little danger of the FCC restricting conservative radio while George W. Bush is president.

Republicans counter that they are worried about new regulations if a Democrat wins the White House in 2008.

Senate Majority Whip Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) said on Tuesday that the government should revive the Fairness Doctrine, a policy crafted in 1929 that required broadcasters to balance political content with different points of view.

“It’s time to reinstitute the Fairness Doctrine,” he said. “I have this old-fashioned attitude that when Americans hear both sides of the story, they’re in a better position to make a decision.”

Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), chairwoman of the Senate Rules Committee, said this week that she would review the constitutional and legal issues involved in re-establishing the doctrine.

Sen. John Kerry (Mass.), the Democratic Party’s 2004 presidential nominee, also said recently that the Fairness Doctrine should return.

In 1985 the FCC discarded the policy after deciding that it restricted journalistic freedom and “actually inhibit[ed] the presentation of controversial issues of public importance to the detriment of the public and in degradation of the editorial prerogative of broadcast journalists,” according to a Congressional Research Service report.

Thursday, the House firmly rejected the prospect of requiring balanced views on talk radio.

Before the passage of the amendment, which he sponsored, Rep. Mike Pence (R-Ind.), a former full-time radio host, forecast a big majority and took a shot at the Senate, saying: “This House will say what some in the other body are not saying, that we believe in freedom on the airwaves. We reject the doctrines of the past that would have this federal government manage political speech on the public airwaves.”

Republican Study Committee Chairman Jeb Hensarling (R-Texas) and Rep. Jeff Flake (R-Ariz.) also sponsored the legislation.

Conservatives fear that forcing stations to make equal time for liberal talk radio would slash profits and pressure radio executives to scale back on conservative programming to avoid escalating costs and interference from government regulators. Opponents of the Fairness Doctrine argue that radio stations would suffer financially if forced to air liberal as well as conservative programs because liberal talk radio has not proven popular or profitable. For example, Air America, liberals’ answer to “The Rush Limbaugh Show” and Michael Medved, filed for bankruptcy in October.

House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-Ohio) said Thursday that listeners should be able to decide if they want to hear different political arguments.

“The best way is to let the judgment of the American people decide, and they can decide with their finger,” Boehner said. “[People] can turn it off or they can turn it on. They can go to their computer and read it on the Internet.”

Flake added: “Rather than having the government regulate what people can say, we should let the market decide what people want to hear. That’s precisely why the Fairness Doctrine was abandoned, and that’s why it ought not to be revived.”

At the end of Thursday’s debate, Democratic House Appropriations Committee Chairman David Obey (Wis.) agreed with Republicans that the government should not regulate conservative radio hosts such as Limbaugh and Hannity.

“We ought to let right-wing talk radio go on as they do now,” he said. “Rush and Sean are just about as important in the scheme of things as Paris Hilton, and I would hate to see them gain an ounce of credibility by being forced by a government agency or anybody else to moderate their views enough that they might become modestly influential or respected.”


TOPICS: Breaking News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 110th; censorship; congress; fairnessdoctrine; fcc; firstamendment; govwatch; silenceamerica; talkradio; vampirebill
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 221-239 next last
To: rface

““Rush and Sean are just about as important in the scheme of things as Paris Hilton, and I would hate to see them gain an ounce of credibility by being forced by a government agency or anybody else to moderate their views enough that they might become modestly influential or respected.”

I think it’s just possible that Rush Limbaugh saved America these past few weeks, by his passionate and articulate explanation of just WHY the immigration bill sucked. In any event, he’s certainly done more for our country than ANY of those feeble-minded jerks on Capitol hill.


81 posted on 06/28/2007 5:10:42 PM PDT by Pravious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: windsorknot
If you replaced Obey with Paris Hilton, no one outside of Congress would notice the difference.

Don't be so sure... She might even be an improvement over Obey, and THAT *would* be noticed...

the infowarrior

82 posted on 06/28/2007 5:12:12 PM PDT by infowarrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Half Vast Conspiracy
Sen. George Voinovich was quoted as saying, “Fairness what?”

I think Sen. Voinovich was the inspiration for Grandpa Simpson...


83 posted on 06/28/2007 5:16:18 PM PDT by COBOL2Java (The Democrat Party: radical Islam's last hope)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Kuksool

How about fairness in academia?


84 posted on 06/28/2007 5:24:21 PM PDT by Conservativegreatgrandma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: rface
“We ought to let right-wing talk radio go on as they do now,” he said. “Rush and Sean are just about as important in the scheme of things as Paris Hilton.......”

Defeat of anmesty today says otherwise. IMO, Dems just don't want to hand conservatives a big issue in 2008 when they assume bush would VETO it. At least the House Dems don't. The 6 year termed Senators on both aisles are another animal altogether. Trent and Mccain would love to silence us much as Hillary and kennedy.

85 posted on 06/28/2007 5:24:44 PM PDT by Soul Seeker (MR. BUSH: GET OUT OF REAGAN'S HOUSE!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rface
Time to CELEBRATE!


86 posted on 06/28/2007 5:28:11 PM PDT by RasterMaster (Rudy, Romney & McCain = KENNEDY wing of the Republican Party - Duncan Hunter, President 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mainepatsfan
They is running ascared!

This is what our decisive win on the immigration issue has accomplished. They want to muzzle talk radio, but THEY DON'T DARE.

87 posted on 06/28/2007 5:30:00 PM PDT by libstripper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: rface
Senate Majority Whip Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) said on Tuesday that the government should revive the Fairness Doctrine

Of course Dick believes the government should regulate free speech, a very Nazi-like attitude. Oops... :)

88 posted on 06/28/2007 5:30:48 PM PDT by Darkwolf377 (Bostonian, atheist, prolifer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AFPhys; VRWCmember
I’m surprised the House acted today on this.

Cut off the head and the body will die! That's what happened today.

As VRWCmember put it:


89 posted on 06/28/2007 5:32:24 PM PDT by Road Warrior ‘04 (Soon to be Fredbacker1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Pravious

Rush was certainly critical. Rush, Sean, laura, mark, Boortz, the blgs, this board, Sessions, DeMint and the other fine conservatives in the Senate AND House, Dorgan, McCaskill and several critical dem freshman deserve kudos, Dobbs, Kaus, Heritage foundation and the list is just too numerous. heck, throw in some of the unions. In the end it came down to the American people vs the elites and Americans saved their republic, for the moment, today.

And that’s the way it had to be. the american people were the only ones with the power to stop it, and they did.


90 posted on 06/28/2007 5:33:57 PM PDT by Soul Seeker (MR. BUSH: GET OUT OF REAGAN'S HOUSE!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: italianquaker
"3 losses for the rats today, fairness,cheney funding and amnesty, being a majority sucks haha"

4! The Supremes overturned race-based public school districting - a monstrosity that took 35 years to end.

91 posted on 06/28/2007 5:35:27 PM PDT by StAnDeliver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: golfisnr1

no they wanted to not fund his office,home etc


92 posted on 06/28/2007 5:37:00 PM PDT by italianquaker ("blue dog democrats", that dog don't hunt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: rface

Socializing the radio industry,BRILLIANT equal time for liberal nonsense that know one is interested in and more importantly is non revenue generation. When are they going to wake up, this is capitolism baby not socialism, stop trying to change America WE DON’T WANT IT! IF YOU ARE NOT HAPPY HERE, pick A SOCIALISTIC COUNTRY! lord knows there are plenty to choose from. You won’t last a minute, because they won’t stand for your non sense! Learn to appreciate what you have here instead of trying to change it for the worst.


93 posted on 06/28/2007 5:37:28 PM PDT by ronnie raygun (I'd rather be hunting with dick than driving with ted)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

“What role did Paris play in today’s Senate Cloture vote?”

She will now have to clean her own room.


94 posted on 06/28/2007 5:40:28 PM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (THE US SENATE IS THE MOST CORRUPT BODY POLITIC SINCE THE ROMAN EMPIRE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: rface

We won two today!

I’m sure we’ll have four steps back soon. The Dems will make sure we pay for thier failures.


95 posted on 06/28/2007 5:41:45 PM PDT by pacelvi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

It’s 1995 in reverse :-)


96 posted on 06/28/2007 5:44:24 PM PDT by sourcery (Global Warming: It's the Sun, Stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: WinOne4TheGipper
“Maybe the next time the Republicans control Congress, the Dems will think twice before prefacing their stupid policy proposals with the words “The American people want...”.”

Maybe next time the republicans gain control they will actually act CONSERVATIVE. There are a whole lotta gubmint agencies just beggin’ to be shut down.

97 posted on 06/28/2007 5:45:38 PM PDT by samm1148 (Pennsylvania-They haven't taxed air--yet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: pacelvi

We won these battles not by insulting people.

We didn’t throw pies at anyone.

We didn’t deface the Capitol.

We didn’t hold signs containing vulgarity in proximity of childen.

We didn’t disrupt speeches.

I’m VERY proud of conservatives today.


98 posted on 06/28/2007 5:45:42 PM PDT by laurie_d
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: rface
“It’s time to reinstitute the Fairness Doctrine,” he said (Durbin). “I have this old-fashioned attitude that when Americans hear both sides of the story, they’re in a better position to make a decision.”

Yep, and the decision would probably ensure that the Demonrats would never again control either the White House or congress. I really don't think this fool thinks these things all the way through.

-Traveler

99 posted on 06/28/2007 5:47:01 PM PDT by Traveler59 (Truth is a journey, not a destination.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: laurie_d

great post....

we are Americans... these hippies.. i dont know where they are from.


100 posted on 06/28/2007 5:49:03 PM PDT by pacelvi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 221-239 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson