Posted on 07/02/2007 11:55:07 AM PDT by pacelvi
To: Speaker Pelosi and other traitors:
As the incidents over the weekend in London and Glasgow demonstrate, we must do more protect Americans from terrorism. To make our nation safer, we must pass legislation implementing the recommendations of the independent 9/11 Commission.
When Democrats took control of Congress in January, the first bill we passed H.R. 1, which implements the 9/11 Commission recommendations. Six months later, despite strong bipartisan support, it has not become law because of Republican obstructionism. I urge Senate Republicans to stop blocking this vital legislation so we can pass it as our first order of business next week and put it on the President's desk. We cannot wait any longer.
Oh give us a break. You are the WORST political leader in this country (as opinion polls confirm). Youre one to talk about obstruction. Whos the one who caused the emergency appropriations for the military in Iraq to be delayed FOR MONTHS for absolutely no reason? You played games with our military to cater to the Hate-America crowd and who knows what you did to give aid and comfort to the Jihadis cause. How do you think our military personnel felt while you blocked their money you hypocrite?
Here is a quiz, genius
what does more to endanger the country in the long-run
1 Passage (or not) of a law that does nothing to dissuade the enemy from attacking us
doing nothing to damage his ideology, resolve , determination, will, and recruitment ability
OR
2 Stating that the US Military HAS FAILED in Iraq. That we will withdraw our forces because the War is Lost. LOST TO WHOM??? Christ,, do you people realize the effect of your idiotic words? You have told the enemy (that you say we must pass laws immediately to protect ourselves against) THAT THEY ARE WINNING. How are we to defeat these religious warriors WHEN YOU ARE TELLING THEM THEY WON.
STOP UNDERMINING EVERYTHING WE ARE DOING THAT IS ACTUALLY EFFECTIVELY AND THEN HIDING BEHIND YOUR RIDICILIOUS OBSOLETE PARTISIAN HACKERY SAYING WE NEED LAWS TO PROTECT US AGAINST THE VERY PEOPLE YOU SAY ARE WINNING AND HAVE DEFEATED OUR MILITARY.
LIKE THEYRE REALLY AFRAID OF YOU. THEY ARE ENCOURAGED BY YOU.
You and your party are a seditious disgrace. Thank God Im not in the military, you demoralize me enough and Im just a citizen.
By the way, the next time you put a picture of a US Military person on your website you should make sure they arent actually from Canadas military. Nice going.. you claim support the military (which no one with a brain believes) yet cant even tell when they have the word CANADA on their uniform that they arent the military of this country. Disrespectfully, []
Did you really send it to the old hag?
Maybe if I dropped trou and sat on my fax machine I could find a way to express my feelings....
Given your salutation, you have guaranteed she will never see it and never hear of it. The interns send documents that begin like yours straight to the circular file.
I missed the Canada thing...what happened? Anyone have a screen capture?!?
Actually, it won’t go to the circular file. It very likely will go to the FBI for further investigation. They key on the number of exclamation marks and bolded letters, as well as content when assaying intent. OP, don’t be surprised if you receive a warning letter or a visit from the good ‘ol boys that gave us Waco AND Ruby Ridge. At the very least they’ll keep this on file for future reference.
So write two letters.
One that makes you feel good, and another you hope they will read.
Twice the mail, twice the hope of having influence.
I thought the same things the author did regarding how it encourages our enemy to moan about how “we’ve lost”, but as I thought again, maybe it is effective to have treasonous poisonous dipspits like Pegrossi caterwauling away.
The enemy gets all pumped up, and then the US military hammers them hard.
Maybe it keeps them confused? And discouraged?
I think you are referring to a copy machine, usually a fax machine has a little chute the paper is taken through, ouch.
I know about the FBI nutcakes file and inquiries, but I don’t believe this would qualify because it contains no threats, indirect or otherwise. I think he can continue to feel good about his letter without worrying about the hot breath of the FBI on his neck. Exclamation marks and bold-face fonts do not, of themselves, a threat make, and a threat is what it takes to get a letter tossed to the FBI for action.
To all you folks who think that if I wrote it politely it would somehow influence her.... LOL.. Yeah right.
As if I’m going to dissuade her from those who pull her string.
So it was all about my feeling good.
Fck her! Someone read the fax.. if they want to trash the fax, that’s on that person’s conscience, not mine.
LOL, well said, thanks for the laugh!!
Yep. I have a little collection going now.. I wrote to Rahm Emanuel, Dick Durbin, Trent Lott, my Chicago congressman about various things in equally blunt and you’ll-hear-what-i-have-to-say language.
Let them trash it.. someone read it. and that’s all i wanted.
Oh, I didn’t use a single Exclamation Point in my fax , by the way.
Men dont use exclamation points.
Let them trash it.. someone read it. and thats all i wanted.
Touche'
Get somebody to proofread it and clean it up next time. It might help a little bit in your quest to be taken seriously.
You’re RIGHT. Nancy would suddenly back Bush... IF ONLY I used 100% flawless grammar! Drat! I ruined it.
/s
Standing ovation my FRiend :)
Well done! {applause, applause}
And what about all the other Muslims sitting on the face.. trying to decide which side of the fence is the winner and the one they should back?
You thinking transmitting “We Lost We Lost We Lost” earns any respect for us.. you think that persuades religious exteremists that it’s futile to fight us?
Do another one.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.