Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Test results: Johnson's blood alcohol level was .072
ESPN.com ^ | 7/2/07 | Unknown

Posted on 07/02/2007 3:31:19 PM PDT by NittanyLion

GILBERT, Ariz. -- Blood tests show former Chicago Bears defensive tackle Tank Johnson's blood alcohol level was below the legal limit when he was arrested on suspicion of drunken driving June 22, police said Monday.

Johnson's blood alcohol level was .072, under the presumptive limit in Arizona of .08 percent, Gilbert police Sgt. Andrew Duncan said.

Under Arizona law, Johnson could still face a charge for "impairment to the slightest degree." The state has separate charges for blood alcohol levels of .08 or higher and .15 or higher. The "slightest degree" charge usually accompanies the other charges, but the state does not have to show any blood alcohol level to bring the minimum charge.

(Excerpt) Read more at sports.espn.go.com ...


TOPICS: Local News; Sports
KEYWORDS: bears; chat; johnson; tank; tanked
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last
I posted this because of this "impairment to the slightest degree" business. Am I the only one who's never heard of such a thing? It seems preposterous.
1 posted on 07/02/2007 3:31:21 PM PDT by NittanyLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NittanyLion

What does “legal limit” mean if being below it still constitutes a defense.

Does this concept apply to speed limits, too?

I’m going to have to ticket you for very nearly speeding.


2 posted on 07/02/2007 3:36:11 PM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NittanyLion

Perhaps its written that way for prior criminals like this football player? Clearly he is not a law abiding citizen.


3 posted on 07/02/2007 3:37:43 PM PDT by alisasny (RIP Lt. Kevin “Kojak” Davis BLUE ANGELS #6 THANKYOU!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NittanyLion

The “impairment to the slightest degree” stuff is generally there for non-alcohol stuff. Most drugs hang out in the bloodstream too long to be able to determine if the person was still under the effects, they also use it for fatigued drivers, and of course as a pile on for drunks.


4 posted on 07/02/2007 3:40:05 PM PDT by discostu (indecision may or may not be my biggest problem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: samtheman

Actually it does apply to the speed limit too, there’s a proviso to the speed limit laws dealing with going too fast for the current conditions. Mostly it comes into play during bad weather or in construction areas generally after an accident, the core logic is that even though you were going the speed limit or lower the fact that you hit somebody shows you were driving too fast for the current conditions.


5 posted on 07/02/2007 3:43:17 PM PDT by discostu (indecision may or may not be my biggest problem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: samtheman

Your BAC drops over time.


6 posted on 07/02/2007 3:45:34 PM PDT by AppyPappy (If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: discostu

That’s why NC uses “Driving While Impaired” rather than drunk driving. You drink a couple of beers and pop a Benedryl and you still blow under the limit. But you are impaired


7 posted on 07/02/2007 3:47:09 PM PDT by AppyPappy (If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: samtheman

I think the law is backward. As it stands, the number is a “per se” violation, meaning just being over the number is a violation. If you are under the number, it can still be a violation if they can prove impairment. I think being under the number should be an absolute defense, or near absolute, and they still bave the burden to prove impairment (FST, etc.) if you are OVER the number. Lots of alkies are perfectly sober at over 0.08, I suspect.


8 posted on 07/02/2007 3:48:23 PM PDT by Still Thinking (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NittanyLion

Don’t take Nyquil.


9 posted on 07/02/2007 3:49:14 PM PDT by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NittanyLion; MurryMom
"impairment to the slightest degree"

Can we now put all leftists behind bars? Please?

10 posted on 07/02/2007 3:50:25 PM PDT by Libloather (That's just what I need - some two-bit, washed up, loser politician giving me weather forecasts...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy

Or you take the time to dry out but by that time it’s late and you can’t see straight. There are tons of ways you can be in no shape to drive and blow a 0.000 on the machine, which is why most of the states changed their laws to deal with with non-alcohol related impairments, the cops got tired of pulling over bobbers and weavers only to find they were stoned not drunk and not be able to nail them with anything.


11 posted on 07/02/2007 3:53:11 PM PDT by discostu (indecision may or may not be my biggest problem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: NittanyLion

You’re from Pennsylvania, right?

Our DUI law permits a finding of guilt for (a) BAC > .08 or (b) impairment in the opinion of the officer (weaving, field sobriety test failure, etc.).


12 posted on 07/02/2007 3:55:35 PM PDT by Petronski (imwithfred.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy

Yes, if that was all they tested for then thats all the lab work there is. This is why observation is a big deal.


13 posted on 07/02/2007 3:55:48 PM PDT by Domangart (editor and publisher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: NittanyLion

It’s all about publicity for prosecutors. Nothing else matters.


14 posted on 07/02/2007 3:59:19 PM PDT by stinkerpot65 (Global warming is a Marxist lie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: samtheman

Really. You ALMOST killed your wife. You were THINKING about robbing that liquor store. Eeesh. If we got arrested for ALMOST committing a crime......


15 posted on 07/02/2007 3:59:29 PM PDT by Hi Heels (Cleverly disguised as a responsible adult.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NittanyLion

Only .072? Sheesh, most Kennedys wake up with a higher BAC :-)


16 posted on 07/02/2007 4:03:11 PM PDT by hometoroost (TSA = Thousands Standing Around)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NittanyLion
Johnson, whose legal name is Terry Darnell Johnson, was arrested when officers pulled him over at 3:30 a.m. for driving 40 mph in a 25 mph zone. Duncan said an officer placed him under arrest because he believed Johnson was under the influence of alcohol. He was released without being booked or charged after providing a blood sample, and police said he was very cooperative.

QUESTIONS:
Were Field Sobrity Tests given?
How long after the intial observation was the blood drawn?
(Normal adult burns off .025 per hour, so, if the blood draw was an hour later, he was .097
Is the blood sample being tested for drugs?

17 posted on 07/02/2007 4:08:25 PM PDT by radar101 (Dream Team--Hunter&Thompson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NittanyLion
“Impaired to the slightest degree” is a joke. I sat on a drunk driver jury. Prosecutor, Defender were buddies. Accused was owner of a surname anyone in Arizona would recognizer.
The Defender ridiculed the arresting police officer: Describe “Impaired to the slightest...”
The jury members sided with the accused because they identified their own behavior as “impaired” under this definition.
And we’re supposed to feel sad when this drunk finally kills someone.....
18 posted on 07/02/2007 4:27:16 PM PDT by WestwardHo (Whom the god would destroy, they first drive mad.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: radar101

I’d like to know where that 25 mph zone was...and what color the sign was. 25 mph is pretty rare except in MAYBE a little village.


19 posted on 07/02/2007 4:32:28 PM PDT by Sacajaweau ("The Cracker" will be renamed "The Crapper")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: samtheman

Sounds like a charge a guy with an 0.081 reading might be allowed to plea to. Me, with an 0.072, I’ll go to the jury, thank you.


20 posted on 07/02/2007 4:32:47 PM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (I never consented to live in the Camp of the Saints.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson