Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Allergic US employee sues to ban perfume at work
Yahoo ^ | July 5, 2007

Posted on 07/05/2007 8:55:27 AM PDT by COUNTrecount

WASHINGTON (AFP) - An office worker for the US city of Detroit is suing for her colleagues to be banned from wearing perfume which gives her such severe headaches, nausea and coughing fits that she must leave work.

Court documents showed Thursday that Susan McBride suffered so acutely from allergy to the chemicals in scents, lotions and sprays that she had to go home sick when a heavily perfumed co-worker shared her office at the city's historic districts department.

Her sensitivity is such that she avoids the detergent sections in shops and cannot sit near perfumed people in a movie theater or on the bus.

The co-worker refused to leave off the perfume, according to the complaint filed at the district court in Detroit, in the northern state of Michigan. McBride needed medical treatment and was off work for some time.

Now she is seeking a jury trial to make the city force fellow employees to come to work un-scented, citing disability discrimination laws. She is claiming unspecified damages for "pain, suffering, humiliation and outrage" suffered.

McBride and her manager have already asked the city authorities that employ her to enforce a "no scent policy as an accommodation to her disability, without success," the complaint said.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: allergies; cranksveto; detroit; fragrances; jerks; liberalagenda; michigan; perfume; workersparadise; workplace
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-113 next last
To: bigred41

Personally, I have to avoid perfume counters, or RUN past them. It’s not as bad now, but a few years ago my throat would swell up to the point I was choking. Ended up an EMS thing once. Fortunately, it has settled down to the point where it is a mere annoyance, not sheer terror.

People who have problems like this (allergies to smoke and scents) shouldn’t be imposing their disabilities on the healthy and productive. Stay home or only go places where it is not a problem.


81 posted on 07/05/2007 6:49:24 PM PDT by TheTruthAintPretty (G-d Bless our brothers and sisters, sons and daughters, fathers and mothers in harm's way!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Madame Dufarge

Yeah I know, back in your mother’s day women thought they just had to sit there and take it.


82 posted on 07/05/2007 7:44:50 PM PDT by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Shots
She has a health problem it is hers and hers alone why should others have to stop using products because SHE is allergic to them?

Yes, because the products are not necessary in the workplace and they are affecting another worker.

Ask yourself why is this person wearing perfume? Is for themselves to smell or are they emitting an aroma for others to detect?

If it is the latter then they are knowingly broadcasting chemical substances that they have been told are harmful to a co-worker.

You peanut analogy is false. If one kid is allergic to peanuts that kid can take steps to avoid them and everyone else can eat them with no detriment to the affected person, therefore banning peanuts is unreasonable. However, in this case, the allergic person has no control over their exposure to the allergen, and it is the other workers that are triggering her allergic reaction with an item they have brought in that doesn't even need to be there.

The only way you analogy holds up is if the other kids are bringing peanuts to school and forcing them down the allergic kid's throat.

83 posted on 07/05/2007 7:56:48 PM PDT by Wil H (Islam - the religion of perpetual outrage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Scotsman will be Free
...I have used an absurd example to expose an absurdity. Where does one draw the line?

The reality is already absurd. I agree with you, it makes you're head spin.

But there are things I can't discount: for example I can't tell whether or not the woman who brought the suit is litigious or desperate. It seems that she didn't just jump into court over this. I'm inclined to sympathize with her as I've suffered the same problems, all of my life.

Maybe I'm romantic, but I seem to recall a time when people voluntarily cooperated with neighbors. In those days politeness was a virtue; now it's regarded a weakness.

There are other factors not mentioned: for example around 30 years ago architects forgot how to put windows in office buildings, and started pumping the air in from the basement and through a matrix of tubes. Office space got more expensive and companies started stuffing employees into offices like Vienna sausages in a can.

These are the same employers who make pissing in a cup a prerequisite to hiring.

A major facet of the root of this is the invasion of privacy. Having our 'business' in the street and the street in our bedrooms is screwing with people's heads. Our society, no longer content with just soap, consumes gallons noxious concoctions to hide its smell. I wonder if deep down, we think we're putrefying. At the same time we call down thunder from heaven, defiant over trivialities like the right to wear cheap cologne, believing this to be emblematic of our freedom.

So now there's a lawsuit; sew the wind and reap the whirlwind.

84 posted on 07/06/2007 2:20:17 AM PDT by tsomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Publius6961

What???? “My neurosis trumps your neurosis”
A neurosis and an allergic reaction are not at all the same thing. While a neurosis might make you uncomfortable, an allergic reaction can stop your ability to breathe.


85 posted on 07/06/2007 5:35:47 AM PDT by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Shots

You know what the allergists would tell her? Stay away from strong scents.


86 posted on 07/06/2007 5:39:46 AM PDT by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Revel
And how many people would YOU have accommodate this person? 10 ? 25? 100? 1000? 5000? 10000? After all, she might just happen to walk by any one of 5000 people and have an allergic reaction.

That dozens or hundreds or thousands should warp their lives around one person is nonsensical.

Oh. And good morning to you too.

87 posted on 07/06/2007 6:42:44 AM PDT by HeartlandOfAmerica (The way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Ditter

No, she just despised whiners.


88 posted on 07/06/2007 8:48:48 AM PDT by Madame Dufarge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Madame Dufarge
LOL! Give me a break! You know what we are talking about here..... smokers not whiners. Back in those days so many people smoked and a non smoker just sat there in silence or left. No complaints ever, just take it and say nothing. I was there, I remember. You smokers long for the old days but they aren’t coming back any time soon, if ever.
89 posted on 07/06/2007 12:57:24 PM PDT by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Ditter
You smokers long for the old days but they aren’t coming back any time soon, if ever.

Do we now?

I've actually found that smoking bans have had the salutary effect of keeping whiners who obsessively blather on at great length about their countless ailments out of my sphere.

Very irritating and generally humorless people, human hairshirts.

90 posted on 07/06/2007 2:35:12 PM PDT by Madame Dufarge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Madame Dufarge

No worse than bitchy old smokers, endless complaining about having to smoke outside.


91 posted on 07/06/2007 3:37:12 PM PDT by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Ditter
To summarize then:

My defense of private property rights vis a vis smoking bans has been filtered through your brain and been perceived, in the absence of any evidence whatsoever, as my "complaining about having to smoke outside."

Your incessant sniveling about your endless list of allergies and your smug elation about smoking bans seems to be a pitiful cry for sympathy and attention.

By the way, does your allergy medication make you irritable?

92 posted on 07/07/2007 4:14:06 AM PDT by Madame Dufarge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Madame Dufarge

Your defense of private property rights is a farce, it is purely self serving.


93 posted on 07/07/2007 5:53:49 AM PDT by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

That’s why they call them Yahoos.


94 posted on 07/07/2007 5:58:07 AM PDT by DeaconBenjamin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Ditter
You've become totally irrational, as usual.
95 posted on 07/07/2007 6:29:11 AM PDT by Madame Dufarge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Madame Dufarge

LOL! Sure, right, think that if it makes you feel better. Go burn some weeds and breathe deeply, that’s rational.


96 posted on 07/07/2007 6:37:43 AM PDT by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: tsomer

84 posts before the REAL problem was even mentioned - the windows don’t open.

Funny how many ills can be cured by fresh air.

And how many are caused by office building air.


97 posted on 07/07/2007 6:48:49 AM PDT by patton (19yrs ... only 4,981yrs to go ;))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

I share an office with someone who is highly sensitive and I am in that office partially because I am known to bathe and use light perfume.

I have a problem with people who take a bath in perfume and come to work and use perfume to cover up the fact that they haven’t seen the inside of a shower in weeks.


98 posted on 07/07/2007 6:49:38 AM PDT by cubswinby100
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

I have a solution. The Muslims have invaded Detroit. Go to work for one of those companies. The smell of non bathing and no perfume will be worse.


99 posted on 07/07/2007 6:49:39 AM PDT by cubswinby100
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Publius6961

Difference is someone’s weight does not hurt someone else.

Of course there’s the weight nazis who only stop beating their kids to make nasty fat remarks,


100 posted on 07/07/2007 6:49:43 AM PDT by cubswinby100
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-113 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson