Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

It's Time to Rethink Marijuana Laws
Philadelphia Enquirer ^ | July 9, 2007 | Kathleen Parker

Posted on 07/09/2007 7:21:35 PM PDT by Eric Blair 2084

WASHINGTON -- News that Al Gore's 24-year-old son, Al Gore III, was busted for pot and assorted prescription pills has unleashed a torrent of mirth in certain quarters.

Gore-phobes on the Internet apparently view the son's arrest and incarceration as comeuppance for the father's shortcomings. Especially rich was the fact that young Al was driving a Toyota Prius when he was pulled over for going 100 mph -- just as Papa Gore was set to preside over concerts during a 24-hour, seven-continent Live Earth celebration to raise awareness about global warming.

Whatever one may feel about the former vice president's environmental obsessions, his son's problems are no one's cause for celebration. The younger Gore's high-profile arrest does, however, offer Americans an opportunity to get real about drug prohibition, and especially about marijuana laws.

For the record, I have no interest in marijuana except as a public policy matter. My personal drug of choice is a heavenly elixir made from crushed grapes. But it is, alas, a drug.

Tasty, attractive and highly ritualized in our culture, wine and other alcoholic beverages are approved for responsible use despite the fact that alcoholism and attendant problems are a plague, while responsible use of a weed that, at worst, makes people boring and hungry, is criminal.

Pot smokers might revolt if they weren't so mellow.

Efforts over the past few decades to relax marijuana laws have been moderately successful. Twelve states have decriminalized marijuana, which usually means no prison or criminal record for first-time possession of small amounts for personal consumption. (Those states are: Alabama, California, Colorado, Maine, Minnesota, Mississippi, Nebraska, Nevada, New York, North Carolina, Ohio and Oregon.)

(Excerpt) Read more at realclearpolitics.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: addled; algore; algoreiii; confuseddopers; davesnothere; drugaddled; gotmunchies; idontunderstand; marijuana; mrleroylives; potheads; waitwhat; warondrugs; waronsomedrugs; wod; wodlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 201-219 next last
To: bajabaja

I have found it difficult to find statistics on lung cancer rates in Google searches but I may try your medpub suggestion sometime. Neither gov sites (NDHS??? NHSD???) or American Cancer Society seem to have them. That makes me suspect an agenda not a genuine regard for disseminating truth. The same lack of info is apparent when one tries to find out how many women die from legal abortions. I know they collect the numbers.


81 posted on 07/09/2007 9:26:04 PM PDT by TigersEye (My heart is broken but my conscience knows its cause.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy

You don’t have one iota of understanding about what the hell you’re talking about.


82 posted on 07/09/2007 9:35:13 PM PDT by jwh_Denver (In the Rise and Fall of United States I hope the Fall part is more than one chapter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
Neither gov sites (NDHS??? NHSD???) or American Cancer Society seem to have them.

Are you talking about the CDC? I am unfamiliar with the NDHS. And as for not trusting numbers completely, I will agree, especially in the example you reference. It has always puzzled me that some of the strongest anti-smokers (anti-big tobacco crusaders) were all for pot smoking. I suspect that inhaling heated chemicals from tobacco or marijuana increases one's risk. Seems illogical to me.
83 posted on 07/09/2007 9:40:15 PM PDT by bajabaja
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: tacticalogic

Hold on. There’s a seed burning a hole in the new carpet.

What the hell were we talking about?


84 posted on 07/09/2007 9:40:41 PM PDT by toddlintown (Six bullets and Lennon goes down. Yet not one hit Yoko. Discuss.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

“Pot’s not dangerous.”

Correct. Hell, I just boiled some hot dogs in one.


85 posted on 07/09/2007 9:43:02 PM PDT by toddlintown (Six bullets and Lennon goes down. Yet not one hit Yoko. Discuss.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

There is a poster’s tagline that goes like this “I never argue with an idiot, they’re drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.”


86 posted on 07/09/2007 9:45:27 PM PDT by jwh_Denver (In the Rise and Fall of United States I hope the Fall part is more than one chapter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy

“Most all violent offenders in California for rape, murder and such were on drugs and substances at the time that almost always INCLUDED pot.”

I’ll bet they also threw down cold glasses of milk sometimes.

Freaking cows!


87 posted on 07/09/2007 9:46:22 PM PDT by toddlintown (Six bullets and Lennon goes down. Yet not one hit Yoko. Discuss.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy
Recreational drug use is not a conservative behavior, it is a problem.

You couldn't be more wrong. Alcohol is a far more pernicious intoxicant than marijuana.

As for not being a "conservative behavior," have you ever been to a fraternity party with alcohol everywhere, a businessman's lunch with martinis, or a XMAS party for a company of mostly conservatives where most were drunk? You're hung up on the word "drug" which conveniently leaves booze out of the equation.

I should know because for many years I smoked weed and drank , and I can tell you that alcohol is far worse. It's not even close.

Alcohol makes many people violent and impairs you to a level that marijuana doesn't. Drunk people get in fights, stoned people don't. As for driving, marijuana doesn't impair you anywhere near as much as alcohol. You might dismiss these statements, but I make them from personal experience, while your views are the result of hearsay.

If one of the two should be illegal, alcohol should.

And, you'd be suprised at how many people hold good jobs with good families who smoke a joint on the weekend.

Of course, using marijuana to excess is bad for a person, just as drinking too much or overeating is unwise, but that doesn't change the fact that marijuana is far less harmful than alcohol.

88 posted on 07/09/2007 11:06:55 PM PDT by SeafoodGumbo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy
Naw the people on pot are not violent. It’s the people on alcohol that get violent and start fights for no apparent reason. Have you went to a party or visited a bar lately? The ones starting bar brawls and fights and the people that are wasted on alcohol. They commit extreme violence and their victims have serious injuries. Alcoholics are notorious for causing extreme violence to family members and domestic violence murders. The pot smokers are the ones chillin relaxed and laughing in the corner at everyone else. Pot makes people less violent in almost every case I’ve ever seen. Even men who are violent in their natural state become mellowed out and less violent from weed. People should encourage more pot smoking and less alcohol. society has the whole thing backwards.
89 posted on 07/09/2007 11:12:34 PM PDT by snowstorm12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy
Six and a half years here and your arguments are no more refined than when you began.
Mix pot with alcohol or any other drugs and it’s a violent mess.
Probably how it got it’s gateway drug reputation.

You leave much to speculation there but later it's a done deal...
I am simply trying to point out that pot (the gateway drug)...
As you well know the gateway "theory" regarding marijuana and other recreational drugs has been disproven, yet you're still here pushing the "same old, same old".
You could probably argue your case better, but then again, I could be wrong. Though it would definitely enhance your reputation.

...the violent offenders pretty much all had pot involved in their problems when they committed crime and had to go to prison.
Perhaps you should read something put out by your own State regarding drug use and crime so your argument will improve...
California’s Criminal Justice System: A Primer January 31, 2007
About 28 percent of violent crimes involved an offender who was perceived to be under the influence of drugs or alcohol.
That means a whopping 62 percent of violent crimes involved an offender who was not under the influence of drugs or alcohol.

90 posted on 07/10/2007 12:34:01 AM PDT by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy; TigersEye

Almost two-thirds of court admissions to state prison are for property and drug offenses, including drug possession (15 percent), (not use) drug sales (15 percent), (not use) burglary (9 percent), and auto theft (7 percent).

Some info above too TE.

91 posted on 07/10/2007 12:44:14 AM PDT by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy
OOPS...a whopping 62 72 percent...
92 posted on 07/10/2007 12:47:02 AM PDT by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Eric Blair 2084
I avoid the Doper/Gay/Abortion Wars threads on FR like the plague-- too much flaming, circular logic, and general idiocy for my tastes...

But I'll say this, for the record- I wish they'd legalize, regulate, and tax the smelly stuff like tobacco, and be done with it.

93 posted on 07/10/2007 2:46:56 AM PDT by backhoe (-30-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

If you’re suggesting that this prohibition has done anything useful, I’d like to know what it is.

The last time around, prohibiton led to higher prices and crime by users to pay the price, black market sales of tainted products, organized crime, massive government corruption, gang murders by the score, gun bans, and a massive assault on the individual’s ability to transfer money.

This time around, it’s led to higher prices and crime by users to pay the price, black market sales of tainted products, organized crime, massive government corruption, gang murders by the score, gun bans, and a massive assault on the individual’s ability to transfer money. And of course, this time we’ve also got the rehab industry.

But sooner or later, someone is going to get it right.


94 posted on 07/10/2007 4:23:25 AM PDT by sig226 (Every time I hit spell check, the fishies got all messed up. 'Bye fishies . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Eric Blair 2084

make marijuana legal along the same guidelines as alcohol: 21 to buy (or 18), no driving under the influence. Quit increasing pushers’ profits. Let individuals grow for their own use but not for sale. Let grown-ups run their own lives and get rid of the wasteful spending on this part of the war on drugs.


95 posted on 07/10/2007 4:36:06 AM PDT by Puddleglum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eric Blair 2084; Abram; akatel; albertp; AlexandriaDuke; Alexander Rubin; Allosaurs_r_us; ...
Libertarian ping! To be added or removed from my ping list freepmail me or post a message here.
96 posted on 07/10/2007 7:58:31 AM PDT by traviskicks (http://www.neoperspectives.com/Ron_Paul_2008.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Allerious

ping


97 posted on 07/10/2007 8:00:53 AM PDT by traviskicks (http://www.neoperspectives.com/Ron_Paul_2008.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: struggle
"...You can usually tell someone is smoking weed and driving because they are usually going 10 mph below the speed limit..."

Truism of the day, FRiend.

98 posted on 07/10/2007 8:03:25 AM PDT by -=SoylentSquirrel=- (Nothing says impotence and inadequacy quite like a Muslim male)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy
It’s not a way to go, is most certainly not the goal of conservative folks,

Then why are you always in the minority on FR drug threads?

99 posted on 07/10/2007 8:11:41 AM PDT by jmc813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: philman_36
Hey, is that pie? I dunno why, I'm just so hungry all of a sudden.

Mmmmm, pie.

Huh. Wait what?

100 posted on 07/10/2007 8:43:08 AM PDT by -=SoylentSquirrel=- (Nothing says impotence and inadequacy quite like a Muslim male)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 201-219 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson