Pro-Immigration Forces Back North American Union

NewsMax.com ^ | July 9, 2007 | John O. Edwards

[rockinqsranch]

“...are all members of the CFR - they’re the ones behind the SPP and the NAU.”

Are we ignoring the “TriLateral Commission” (do a search) participation in this scheme? From what I’ve read on the topic, they are the primary designers.

Agreed the CFR has considerable input and leadership, but let us not allow the “TriLateral Commission” to escape their responsibility in all this.

[ALPAPilot]

I’ve always been a fan of “Manifest Destiny”. There is no doubt in my mind that many in the North land would love spending winters down on Coastal Oaxaca.

[WWTD]

The TC is just an offshoot of the CFR. It was founded by CFR chairman emeritus David Rockefeller. The goal of the TC is to form three governments - Europe, Asia, and the Americas - an intermediate step to a one world government. They have already succeeded in Europe, and the NAU is their current goal here. As for the asian part of the plan, take a wild guess which major religion's adherents would never submit to a world government? That might explain our current foreign policy. I hate to sound all kooky and conspiratorial, but the pieces just fit too well for me to ignore them. Here's the money quote: At the Bilderbergers meeting in Baden-Baden, Germany, 1991, regarding the preparations for the world government, one world dictatorship, David Rockefeller told the following: “We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications, whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost 40 years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world, if we had been subjected to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march toward a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries.”

[Sherman Logan]

The problem is that there is no significantly large group of voters in ANY of the three countries that is in favor of this solution.

[Sacajaweau]

IIRC, Ben Franklin at some point refers to the United States as the North America Union.

[Kimberly GG]

“We’re not afraid of globalization. It works to our benefit. We innovate more and invest in that innovation better than anywhere else in the world. Same thing goes for services. Free trade and market economies have done more for freedom and prosperity than a central planner could ever dream and we’re the world’s best example of that.”

F.Thompson, 2006

[Kimberly GG]

“It would not stand up in a court of law under equal application of the law.”

As I understand it, different courts, different laws, just like with European Union.

[Obie Wan]

No question the North American Union was priority number one for George Bush when he took office. His oath of office had just about been said when he was down in Mehico formulating the plan with Vicente Fox. Ironically I think the 9\11 attack may have slowed down the NAU program somewhat !!!

[Halgr]

Thanks for that quote

That cinches it for me....I’ll vote for Ron Paul

Damn

[truthkeeper]

The problem is that there is no significantly large group of voters in ANY of the three countries that is in favor of this solution.

Voters?? We don't need no stinkin' voters!

[KevinDavis]

Beware of the Stonecutters..

[supremedoctrine]

You may be missing the point-—we are not being asked to “join” Mexico-—we are being TOLD both that they are joining US, or WORSE, that we are “trading places”.

[truthkeeper]

Is www.whitehouse.gov a tinfoil site now too? http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2007/06/20070615-10.html

President Bush to Attend North American Leaders' Summit in Canada

"President Bush will travel to Montebello, Quebec, Canada to meet with Prime Minister Stephen Harper of Canada and President Felipe Calderon of Mexico at the North American Leaders' Summit on August 20-21, 2007. The leaders will review progress and continued cooperation under the Security and Prosperity Partnership, as well as discuss hemispheric and global issues."

[GreenLanternCorps]

The problem is that there is no significantly large group of voters in ANY of the three countries that is in favor of this solution.

It's a "North American Union" thread, common sense, logic and actual facts are irrelevant. Arguing with the Jerome Corsi/Whirled Nut Daily worshippers is like arguing with a Hare Krishna in an airport...

The idea that the US, Canada, and Mexico might actually make a good faith effort to cooperate in some areas where we agree is just an excuse to foam at the mouth.

It's easier to oppose the phantom "NAU" than deal with real problems like border control, Red China, Islamo-fascism, Democrat defeatism, a hopelessly broken and corrupt UN, activist courts, genocide, etc.

[Halgr]

Its not phantom....and if you were to decide to have an open mind...I can send you a URL where I have put together considerable research on the NAU and the SPP.

[rockinqsranch]

The Illegal Immigration Bill recently defeated was not only a real attempt by NAU, thus Globalist oriented Leftist elitists, but ended up a test of the will of the American people.

We must note they have the advantage of knowledge of full perspective of the design created by TriLateral/CFR as it has been kept secret, and actually still is as it doesn’t operate at radar level.

I believe, as I have stated since Carter WH days we need to flush the Congressional bowl at least three consecutive election cycles until not one of those absorbed elitists in Government for Government remains. I believe it is the only way we can retain our Constitution, and our Nation.

We must also have a means test for any and all whom desire to campaign for a “Representative” position in our Government. We need determine the intent of the person. We also need those individuals upon gaining a passing grade to campaign to “Represent” us to take an oath of intent to remain true to the criterion of their campaign and the platform of the Party.

[gemma0000]

I don’t think America needs another actor, especially one who’s a member of the cfr. There is but one Ronald Reagan, and those goofballs who try to emulate him for political gain need to be rejected like flies. If our next President isn’t either Duncan Hunter or Tom Tancredo, then it doesn’t really make much difference to me who gets in. You’ve got alleged ‘conservatives’ like Giuliani who are radical lefties on domestic issues, and you’ve got a handful of front-runner Republicans who are globalists who believe our future lies in a ‘North American Union’. As other posters have said, Fred Thompson is a member of the CFR, so what does he have in mind for the US? I pray to God that Duncan Hunter is our next President, or Tancredo, but I really don’t see the tidal wave of globalism that is sweeping over the world abating anytime soon.

[Clemenza]

I think this idea of a “North American Union” peaked when I was in high school (early-mid 1990s). I remember discussing it often in my social studies classes.

[Halgr]

If what I hear about Globalism and the Elites behind it....they have the media wrapped up...I don’t think the true conservatives like Tancredo, Hunter or Paul stand a chance....but I have to vote my conscience.

I just hope that more conservatives wake up to the reality of the NAU, SPP and possible NWO.

[processing please hold]

I am saddened by the number of FReepers that are clueless about whats going on.

That, or they secretly support it. They can't very well come out and announce their support, they'd be outta here. Remember, we have our share of FROBL skulking around FR, why not NAU supporters as well?