Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pro-Immigration Forces Back North American Union
NewsMax.com ^ | July 9, 2007 | John O. Edwards

Posted on 07/10/2007 2:16:04 AM PDT by GiovannaNicoletta

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last

1 posted on 07/10/2007 2:16:06 AM PDT by GiovannaNicoletta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: GiovannaNicoletta

Mexico has a long way to go before I’d want to join them.


2 posted on 07/10/2007 2:23:27 AM PDT by Paladin2 (Islam is the religion of violins, NOT peas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GiovannaNicoletta

When they get this naughty NAU thingy going, US Border Patrol agents will be operating in Mexico. And Federales will be writing speeding tickets on the Trans Texas Corridors.


3 posted on 07/10/2007 2:28:24 AM PDT by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GiovannaNicoletta

People need to seriously ask all of the ‘08 GOP Presidential candidates about their take on the issue of the possible creation of the “North American Union”! Ask them now, and ask them often!


4 posted on 07/10/2007 2:28:51 AM PDT by johnthebaptistmoore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GiovannaNicoletta

I’m an American.
Not a North American.
This union B.S. is for nothing but big business.
I am not Mexican nor Canadian, I am an American.
My constitution can’t be over ruled by some damn treaty b.s.


5 posted on 07/10/2007 2:38:03 AM PDT by Joe Boucher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnthebaptistmoore; nicmarlo
"People need to seriously ask all of the ‘08 GOP Presidential candidates about their take on the issue of the possible creation of the “North American Union”! Ask them now, and ask them often!"

Agreed.

6 posted on 07/10/2007 2:40:07 AM PDT by WorkerbeeCitizen (An American Patriot and an anti-Islam kind of fellow. (POI))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Joe Boucher

I am saddened by the number of FReepers that are clueless about whats going on.

Do a google on the North American Union, the Amero and the SPP....

There is a lot of information out there that is really frightening.


7 posted on 07/10/2007 2:45:58 AM PDT by Halgr (Once a Marine, always a Marine - Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: johnthebaptistmoore

I sent Fred an email asking about his position regarding the SPP and NAU.....never got a reply.


8 posted on 07/10/2007 2:47:12 AM PDT by Halgr (Once a Marine, always a Marine - Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: GiovannaNicoletta

When you really reduce it to its common denominator, this NAU is probably the supreme driving force and motivation behind Bush ignoring 90% of the country, his own Party grassroots be damned, in rushing into legalizing millions upon millions of criminals, who will only inspire millions more to come.


9 posted on 07/10/2007 2:54:33 AM PDT by AmericanInTokyo (Sad so many members of the World's Policeman--our fellow Americans--know little about their "beat")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GiovannaNicoletta
Let me get this straight.

So an illegal alien who has Mexican citizenship will be allowed a United States (oops, sorry, "North American") Social Security Card, but an illegal alien who has Costa Rican citizenship (or Irish, Korean, Japanese, whatever) will NOT be allowed? It would not stand up in a court of law under equal application of the law. How could SSN law be ammended to allow only one country of of 180 (it's nationals) to be permitted such US documentation??

What are those CFR New Yorkers smoking in their pipes anyway??!!

10 posted on 07/10/2007 2:57:36 AM PDT by AmericanInTokyo (Sad so many members of the World's Policeman--our fellow Americans--know little about their "beat")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Halgr

Everybody seriously needs to e-mail all of the GOP Presidential candidates about the possible creation of the “North American Union” while it hasn’t truly become a reality yet. Don’t just e-mail them once and then give up! This is too important an issue to just ignore, and it’s important to stay ahead of the curve on this. We all don’t want to find out when it’s too late to actually do something about this that the “North American Union” will be a reality very soon!


11 posted on 07/10/2007 3:17:08 AM PDT by johnthebaptistmoore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: GiovannaNicoletta

Thanks for posting the entire article.

For later.


12 posted on 07/10/2007 3:18:07 AM PDT by upchuck (If you don't have borders, you won't have a nation ~ Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GiovannaNicoletta

Talk about a thief in the night. The country stolen, lock stock, and barrel, while we sleep. If impeachment takes center stage, this should be the main article. And that goes for all the other traitorous lawmakers who back the NAU. What they tried to pull has been ongoing for years, deliberate, with malice aforethought.


13 posted on 07/10/2007 3:26:08 AM PDT by hershey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GiovannaNicoletta

I’ve been warning about this for years, ever since NAFTA and CAFTA. The CFR and those secret Bilderburg meetings, which big business attended, along with various elitists in and out of govt...from Mexico and points south. And what was posted more often than not in reply? ‘Oh, pooh, pooh, tin foil conspiracy time’. Well, yes, Virginia, there is a conspiracy.


14 posted on 07/10/2007 3:30:48 AM PDT by hershey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GiovannaNicoletta

The only Republican presidential candidates who I trust to oppose the NAU are Tancredo, Hunter, and Paul.

Fred Thompson, Tommy Thompson, Rudy, Mitt, and McCain are all members of the CFR - they’re the ones behind the SPP and the NAU.

Unfortunately, most FReepers have decided that the candidates publicly opposed to the NAU are all nutjobs and that their salvation rests with one of the CFR candidates. Suckers.

Here’s Shlafly on the NAU:

http://www.eagleforum.org/column/2005/july05/05-07-13.html

And here’s Lou Dobbs:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2kjsy2Z3kdI&mode=related&search=

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ernLnhIR8uI


15 posted on 07/10/2007 3:37:59 AM PDT by WWTD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WWTD

Fred had better make his position on the NAU crystal clear and fast.


16 posted on 07/10/2007 3:39:11 AM PDT by hershey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: GiovannaNicoletta

This NAU plan IS what they have in mind. Problem is, people do not wish to believe it because this plan has been hidden by naming those who bring it up as tin foil hatters.

I really think there is no way to avoid this fate unless people really are willing to fight it. It seems all get caught up in party politics as usual and fail to see that this plan has no party.


17 posted on 07/10/2007 3:39:18 AM PDT by dforest (Roger Hernand still steenks...oops, did I forget the EZ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo
There are two reasons why SS Totalization agreements are implemented.

The first is based on the level of cross-border ownership and employment. When that level reaches a certain point, and employers and employees are paying enough SS dollars to both countries' govt, it becomes a financial burden, so a Totalization Agreement between two countries will be negotiated.

The second reason is that the US will use these Totalization Agreements as a carrot to implement global strategies. The US has goals in Eastern Europe, therefore, the US is willing to implement the pending Toalization Agreements with Poland and the Czech Republic to further these goals.

As for Costa Rica, the prez has the administrative authority to implement limited regulatory changes to further SPP with Mexico and Canada. But for a full blown North American security arrangement to be put in place, an act of Congress is required. And if you look a the legislation on North American Perimeter Security in the last Congress, Central America(including Costa Rica) was included.

18 posted on 07/10/2007 3:52:10 AM PDT by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: hershey; All

http://www.imwithfred.com/Contact.aspx

Here is Fred’s email contact web page.

I have just written him a second time about the NAU as I never got a response over a month ago.

Perhaps if enough of us voice our concerns, Fred might take the hint.


19 posted on 07/10/2007 4:04:44 AM PDT by Halgr (Once a Marine, always a Marine - Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: GiovannaNicoletta

Damn, I just did a google, it appears that Fred IS a CFR Member!!!!


20 posted on 07/10/2007 4:11:02 AM PDT by Halgr (Once a Marine, always a Marine - Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson