Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: republicpictures

The property owner built the concrete wall within an area under the jurisdiction of the US Government. This had to known by the land owner, because the treaty requirement have been in force for over a hundred years. It has nothing to do with loss of any property rights or property taking, since it is a land use deed restriction encumbet on the owner, similar to zoning ordinances and other land use restrictions we all have to abide with.


13 posted on 07/10/2007 9:41:06 PM PDT by balticbeau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: balticbeau
Yup. At this point, it lLooks to me like yet another stupid and careless move by President Bush, when it comes to border security.

Whether it's illegal hirers, globalist special interest groups, or wealthy estate owners, they come before sound national defense.

18 posted on 07/10/2007 11:20:37 PM PDT by unspun (FReep Bill O'Reilly on Iraq!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: balticbeau

Bump.


26 posted on 07/11/2007 5:42:37 AM PDT by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: balticbeau

exactly. these restrictions were there when they purchased the land and should be clearly described on their deed

this would happen if a neighbor, or a utility or anyone else had obtained an easement, prior to the deed. they simply have no legal right to put up a fence there


32 posted on 07/11/2007 6:41:19 AM PDT by ChurtleDawg (kill em all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson