Posted on 07/13/2007 9:49:37 PM PDT by monomaniac
Their opinion matters not.
ImaGraftedBranch.
bookmark
Yhose gigantic Korean Christian churches better get on the offensive and back their Catholic brothers up on protecting unborn children.
If not a human person, what is the unborn child? Tissue?
“Their opinion matters not.”
It does for them ... but I’m sure they would feel the same way about your opinion of their internal decisions.
ping
you are talking man to man.........God has already spoken on the matter.
So a kid born with a c-section is not human?
These pictures prove they are wrong:
http://www.abortionno.org/Resources/pictures_3.html
(abortion photos at link)
“you are talking man to man.........God has already spoken on the matter.”
so are you ... why bother ?
Korea's Birth Rate Hits All-Time Low
There are going to be a lot less Koreans around.
“There are going to be a lot less Koreans around.”
Nope according to your source there will be .15% more of them around ...
... so they only need to prepare by making sure they have .15 more schools, roads, hospitals etc.
...and from the amount of buiding going on over there it looks like they will exceed .15% capacity, so thier kids will have less crowded schools, housing, transportation etc.
So, how does this ruling occur? A "enlightened" liberal activist Korean judge "rescuing" the "old way", "oppressed" Koreans from their "backward" culture?
By saying that something "had died," aren't you admitting that it was previously alive?
The baby died on its own in the mother's womb; the midwife did not kill it.
However, she gave advice which may have resulted in the baby's death. If the mother had consulted a physician instead of the midwife (practicing medicine without a license?), the mother might have been able to save the baby by having it earlier through Caeserian section.
“However, she gave advice which may have resulted in the baby’s death. If the mother had consulted a physician instead of the midwife (practicing medicine without a license?), the mother might have been able to save the baby by having it earlier through Caeserian section.”
Or not....
Monday morning quarterbacking ?
Would you FORCE every woman to see the doctor you have obviously provided to everyone in the world ?
This case pushes a lot of hot-buttons, but there is no claim that the midwife caused intentional harm to anyone. The question is whether she, as a medical professional, negligently disregarded commonly accepted standards of care. The article does not speak to that.
This case did not make new law; it just didn’t change the standing law. It couldn’t. It’s the wrong case for it.
in the course of discussion on this thread last night,I received several freeper emails and folks........it was weird beyong measure..........now notice the subject is abortion............so I got this e mail........
“” he designed man to his own specification-do you really think he has a right to get pissed off when we act within the parameters he gave us? “
it got seriously more bizzare in the freep mail but this is their mindset...........
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.