Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Did Rome Fall? It's Time For New Answers
History News Network ^ | 7-16-2007 | Peter heather

Posted on 07/16/2007 5:34:07 PM PDT by blam

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 next last
To: blam

Not enough conquests to supply slaves to work the gold and silver mines that paid the amount of troops needed to maintain the extensive borders.


21 posted on 07/16/2007 5:57:37 PM PDT by Snickering Hound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bannie; blam

The problem is, ancient history was already rewritten.

Only Gibbon’s attempt to deny the Christian with its capital at New Rome (a.k.a. Constantinople) as the organic continuation of the Roman Empire, so as to claim the ‘glories’ of pagan Rome for an anti-Christian ‘Enlightenment’, made 476 into a significant event.

The retirement of the last Western Augustus to a villa near Naples, with the decision of the Eastern Augustus, Zeno, to assume the sole Emperorship, and allow administration of the West to be given over to Odovacer as Patrician of the Romans, was not understood by any contemporary as ending Roman rule over Italy: the pattern of sometimes one, sometimes two, Emperors or Augusti (one for the East and one for the West) had been set by Diocletian’s reforms, and the capital moved to Constantinople by Constantine.

Direct Imperial rule was reestablished in the West under Justinian, and even after effective control passed back to the local Germanic ‘nobility’, there is ample documentary evidence that people still regarded the Emperor in Constantinople as, at least theoretically, the highest political authority.

Even the Imperial coronation of Charlemagne by Pope Leo in 800 was understood by Charlemagne as reestablishing the office of Western Augustus, at least until his position was not recognized by the actual Roman Emperor at Constantinople, at which point he began styling himself ‘Holy Roman Emperor’, and referring to the Roman Emperor, Irene (yes, she was styled Imperator and Basileus, not Empress), as ‘Emperor of the Hellenes’—and insult, since until about 1800 Hellene was understood as ‘pagan’.

The Alexiad, a biography of the Emperor Alexius I by his daughter, consistantly refers to the Empire at the time of the Crusades as the Roman Empire.

The book sounds like an inadequate attempt at fixing the rewrite that already took place.


22 posted on 07/16/2007 6:00:00 PM PDT by The_Reader_David (And when they behead your own people in the wars which are to come, then you will know. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: blam

Don’t forget Constantine, and the rise of Christianity.


23 posted on 07/16/2007 6:00:16 PM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bannie

no, this is a genuine piece of research.


24 posted on 07/16/2007 6:03:12 PM PDT by ken21 ( b 4 fred.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: The_Reader_David

If you have a FReeper ping list, I’d be happy to be on it.


25 posted on 07/16/2007 6:03:57 PM PDT by Radix (Why do they call them Morons when they do not know so much? Shouldn't they be called Lessons?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: MichiganMan

What part of Meechegan are you from?


26 posted on 07/16/2007 6:05:25 PM PDT by Thebaddog (My dogs are tired)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: The_Reader_David

Very informative and very interesting.

I appreciate the time you took, and I appreciate the education.

:-)


27 posted on 07/16/2007 6:05:28 PM PDT by bannie (The Good Guys cannot win when they're the only ones to play by the rules.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: ken21

Thank you, Ken.
I’m catching on.

(I am glad to have made this mistake because I’m learning much.)


28 posted on 07/16/2007 6:06:24 PM PDT by bannie (The Good Guys cannot win when they're the only ones to play by the rules.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: blam

ping


29 posted on 07/16/2007 6:08:19 PM PDT by Victor (If an expert says it can't be done, get another expert." -David Ben-Gurion, the first Prime Minister)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nabber; JustAmy
"Rome fell for one reason only—Fred Thompson had not been born yet."

Woo hoo!! Run, FRed, Run!!

30 posted on 07/16/2007 6:11:44 PM PDT by Jim Robinson (Our God-given unalienable rights are not open to debate, negotiation or compromise!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Williams

Maybe you should take another look at the book cover.


31 posted on 07/16/2007 6:12:05 PM PDT by dr_lew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: blam

Edward Gibbon’s history of the decline and fall ends in 1453 with the capture of Constantinople by the Turks. That’s one long fall, and it puts into perspective the fact that the Roman empire never really decisively “fell” - it gradually evolved into something else. And in a sense it still exists in the form of the Roman Catholic Church, which is organized along the lines of the later imperial government.


32 posted on 07/16/2007 6:16:52 PM PDT by Argus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Why Did Rome Fall? It's Time for New Answers

I rely far more on the old answers because they just make far more sense.

"The Roman Republic fell, not because of the ambition of Caesar or Augustus, but because it had already long ceased to be in any real sense a republic at all. When the sturdy Roman plebeian, who lived by his own labor, who voted without reward according to his own convictions, and who with his fellows formed in war the terrible Roman legion, had been changed into an idle creature who craved nothing in life save the gratification of a thirst for vapid excitement, who was fed by the state, and who directly or indirectly sold his vote to the highest bidder, then the end of the Republic was at hand, and nothing could save it. The laws were the same as they had been, but the people behind the laws had changed, and so the laws counted for nothing.
Teddy Roosevelt on the Fall of the Republic

Do you see parallels when socialism-seeking liberals re-interpret the Constitution's words to avoid amending them? How long before America ceases to be a Republic and becomes the dreaded democracy?

33 posted on 07/16/2007 6:19:37 PM PDT by MosesKnows
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

So...Rome fell due to illegal immigration. And because the Romans lacked the will to oppose it. Sounds familiar (unfortunately). If you’re really interested in ancient Rome, then watch “I, Claudius”. While fiction, much of it is based on fact. Those Romans were one wild bunch, especially Livia, Caligula, and Messilina. Wow!!


34 posted on 07/16/2007 6:28:34 PM PDT by rbg81 (DRAIN THE SWAMP!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

Rome fell because Chuck Norris didn’t like their attitude. Plus he needed the Coliseum to film his fight scene with Bruce Lee in Return of the Dragon.


35 posted on 07/16/2007 6:31:47 PM PDT by Melinator (testing... test, test, test, Is this thing on?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nabber

Nope, that isn’t it — Rome fell because Chuck Norris gave the Forum a roundhouse kick! You can still see the damage done to the Coliseum.


36 posted on 07/16/2007 6:33:26 PM PDT by GadareneDemoniac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: blam
Why did Rome fall...? I assume Titus Pullo’s kinfolk had something to do with it, purely by accident of course.
37 posted on 07/16/2007 6:36:42 PM PDT by Shqipo (We win now or darkness reigns.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Argus; The_Reader_David

And in a sense it still exists in the form of the Roman Catholic Church..


Can’t be. Not possible.

The Eastern Orthodox Church is the natural and historical inheritor of Rome/Christendom...and since its subjugation by islam...only Russia can possibly claim the mantle as in Byzantism which refers to a renewed Russia to counter the increasing secularism of the West.


38 posted on 07/16/2007 6:40:56 PM PDT by eleni121 (+ En Touto Nika! By this sign conquer! + Constantine the Great)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Radix

That’s BS. Even when I’m driving, I can do a couple of 800mi (~1500km = 33.3x) days in a row. If all goes well, one can do even better by flying.


39 posted on 07/16/2007 6:42:40 PM PDT by Paladin2 (Islam is the religion of violins, NOT peas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: eleni121

“The Eastern Orthodox Church is the natural and historical inheritor of Rome/Christendom...and since its subjugation by islam...only Russia can possibly claim the mantle as in Byzantism which refers to a renewed Russia to counter the increasing secularism of the West.”

The protestant churches are as derivative from the church of Rome as the Russian church is from Constantinople.

Also, as a matter of fact, there are other eastern european countries that maintained the faith far better than the KGB riddled church of the Kremlin.

The bottom line is that there is a direct lineage from the Roman Empire to the Holy Roman Empire and then to the current superpowers.


40 posted on 07/16/2007 6:53:50 PM PDT by spanalot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson