Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Did Rome Fall? It's Time For New Answers
History News Network ^ | 7-16-2007 | Peter heather

Posted on 07/16/2007 5:34:07 PM PDT by blam

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 next last

1 posted on 07/16/2007 5:34:19 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

GGG Ping.


2 posted on 07/16/2007 5:34:52 PM PDT by blam (Secure the border and enforce the law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

Oh, crap.

Are we gonna’ rewrite ANCIENT history too?


3 posted on 07/16/2007 5:35:45 PM PDT by bannie (The Good Guys cannot win when they're the only ones to play by the rules.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

and all this in a period where the speed of bureaucratic functioning and of military response rattled along at 45 kilometres a day,

Not true. Rome could pass messages from one end of the empire to another in a matter of days.


4 posted on 07/16/2007 5:37:05 PM PDT by saganite (Billions and billions and billions----and that's just the NASA budget!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

Rome fell for one reason only—Fred Thompson had not been born yet.


5 posted on 07/16/2007 5:41:40 PM PDT by Nabber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten; 6323cd; 75thOVI; Adrastus; A message; AnAmericanMother; ACelt; ...

Military history ping. Previous threads on the ping list include one on Attila the Hun at the Battle of Chalons.


6 posted on 07/16/2007 5:41:44 PM PDT by indcons (Please contribute to FreeRepublic; what would we do without this forum?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: saganite

How?


7 posted on 07/16/2007 5:43:01 PM PDT by scrabblehack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: blam

This answer is easy. Rome fell because the society got rich, liberal and complacent and no longer felt a strong military or decisive action was worth the effort.

Reliance on mercenaries to do their fighting, evasion of taxes needed to keep up the Republic and a general malaise that they were invincible led to their destruction.

In other words they became fat, dumb and lazy. Just like America today.


8 posted on 07/16/2007 5:43:27 PM PDT by txzman (Jer 23:29)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: scrabblehack

Signal towers.


9 posted on 07/16/2007 5:43:56 PM PDT by saganite (Billions and billions and billions----and that's just the NASA budget!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: bannie
Oh, crap.

Are we gonna’ rewrite ANCIENT history too?

Well, to be fair, you have to acknowledge that the Ancient History we are familiar with has probably been rewritten a couple of dozen times. ;-)

10 posted on 07/16/2007 5:45:43 PM PDT by MichiganMan (Last year, this consumer spent over $150 on native Linux games. Who wants my business next year?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: blam

later read


11 posted on 07/16/2007 5:46:32 PM PDT by Last Dakotan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

Rome fell because it didn’t kill the anti-Romans faster than the anti-Romans killed the Romans.


12 posted on 07/16/2007 5:48:03 PM PDT by festus (The constitution may be flawed but its a whole lot better than what we have now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Always be cautious of theories as to "why" the Roman Empire collapsed. You really have to read Gibbons and that is a massive, multi-volume, 1500 years plus history.

But yes, Germanic "immigration" both internal and external (meaning military invasions) were a major league element to Rome's downfall.

It gets more complicated, but for example at the end when the city itself fell, Gibbons claims the gates were opened in the night by some inhabitants whose sympathies lay more with the forces outside than with the Roman authority inside the city.

In many ways Rome had tried to absorb the germans, or had been forced to do so. Rome was surviving in the end with a German mercenary army and with the help of German allies. Rome became weaker and the German "guests" stronger.

Modern authors don't like to mention that Gibbons also attributed the fall to the Romans becoming an unwarlike people who relied on others to do their fighting. Or that religion softened the fall because the Germans by that time had become Christians.

13 posted on 07/16/2007 5:50:05 PM PDT by Williams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MichiganMan

You’re right...what WAS I thinking?

(Apparently, I wasn’t.)

:-)
Thanks for shaking me out of my silliness!


14 posted on 07/16/2007 5:52:54 PM PDT by bannie (The Good Guys cannot win when they're the only ones to play by the rules.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: txzman
Tolerance. The final nail in any country's coffin. When leaders and citizens become so lazy and complacent to fight for what they believe in and KNOW to be right, then tolerance is introduced as a way to avoid getting off their lazy a**es and doing something about it. It's a way to relieve themselves of the guilt. And it always leads to the fall of a nation. Always.
15 posted on 07/16/2007 5:53:52 PM PDT by small voice in the wilderness ( Bumper sticker idea: Hillary/Obama Nation '08. Let the desolation begin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: blam
 
"...the Roman Empire was arguably ten times as big as it appears from the map. "
 
Hence the practice of "1 inch = 10 miles" on contemporary map keys.
 
 
Awesome post.

16 posted on 07/16/2007 5:54:37 PM PDT by Radix (Why do they call them Morons when they do not know so much? Shouldn't they be called Lessons?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Williams

I heard it was the lead poisoning from the plumbing they installed.


17 posted on 07/16/2007 5:55:00 PM PDT by txhurl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Williams

The Romans were master engineers when it came to moving water. Aqueducts, constant flow sewerage, etc.

They even invented lead pipe. Lead, which is poisonous, leached out into the drinking water.

Some say this contributed to a collective insanity among the ruling class, who enjoyed the very best in running water technology.


18 posted on 07/16/2007 5:56:09 PM PDT by elcid1970
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: festus
The Western Empire fell when the illegal aliens took over. In earlier centuries those folks were barbarians with limited military sophistication and could be manipulated by Rome. In the 400s they'd become more civilized and therefore much more dangerous. They ended up beating the Romans fair and square.

Then the comet hit and everything changed. Lot of effort was wasted when the Northern half of the Western Empire simply shut down (economically and socially) in or about 541 AD for the next thousand years.

19 posted on 07/16/2007 5:57:31 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: txzman

“Rome fell because the society got rich, liberal and complacent and no longer felt a strong military or decisive action was worth the effort.”

You left out ‘gay’.


20 posted on 07/16/2007 5:57:34 PM PDT by G Larry (Only strict constructionists on the Supreme Court!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson