Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Israeli High Court Rules Terror Victims Can Sue The PA
IMRA ^ | 7-17-07

Posted on 07/17/2007 7:30:08 AM PDT by SJackson

Israeli High Court Rules Terror Victims Can Sue The PA

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE July 17, 2007 ISRAELI HIGH COURT RULES TERROR VICTIMS' CASES CAN PROCEED AGAINST THE PALESTINIAN AUTHORITY

Israeli terror victims and their families have today scored a landmark victory in their legal struggle to win compensation from the Palestinian Authority (PA) for its role in perpetrating and financing acts of terror .

In a sparsely written decision handed down this morning by the Israeli Supreme Court, the Justices held that cases brought against the PA by Israeli citizens must be allowed to proceed in the Jerusalem District Court.

Attorneys for the PA had sought to argue that the PA was a state and had sovereign immunity which shielded it from civil lawsuits brought by the victims of PA sponsored terror. Although the District Court had rejected this defense and ordered the cases to go forward, the PA filed an interim appeal of the lower court's decision to the Supreme Court.

The PA's appeal was filed in 2003. Attorneys for the terror victim families argued that the matter of the PA's status and the question of its immunity had already been decided by the Foreign Ministry, whose opinion the District Court had accepted and that the PA had no right to seek a ruling by the Supreme Court on other unripe legal issues. As such, there was no basis for the appeal and the proceedings in the District Court should be allowed to go forward.

The Supreme Court, however, stayed the lower court cases and then refused to rule on the appeal for four years! The Supreme Court repeatedly delayed scheduling the case for oral arguments and would not bring itself to actually writing its decision. Throughout the long four years the case remained on the Supreme Court's docket, the Justices took every opportunity they could to postpone the matter, including granting the PA and State's Attorney numerous extensions of time and, thus, unjustly deprived the terror victims their day in court. It was obvious to the terror victims and their families that the Supreme Court's ideological bias in favor of the PA factored heavily in its deliberate effort to obstruct their cases from being heard.

Today's Supreme Court ruling upheld the decision of the District Court and adopted all of the arguments of the attorneys for the terror victims. In fact, the appeal could have been rejected by the Supreme Court the day after it was filed four years ago as this long-delayed decision contained nothing new. .

According to lead counsel for the terror victim families Attorney Nitsana Darshan-Leitner: "This is an important decision which will now allow the terror victims to have their cases heard against the Palestinian Authority. The Israeli Supreme Court has finally ruled as other courts around the world already have ruled -- that the PA must face trial for its involvement in terror. There was no legal reason and certainly no moral reason to delay the cases for four years. The family of the "Ramallah Lynch" victims and other innocent Israeli victims of Palestinian terror will now be able to receive a measure of justice from the ones who devastated their lives."


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Israel; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: israel

1 posted on 07/17/2007 7:30:10 AM PDT by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SJackson

WooHoo!
Sue ‘em for all the (taxpayer) money President Bush is sending them! I think its $990 million.


2 posted on 07/17/2007 7:32:28 AM PDT by Little Ray (Rudy Guiliani: If his wives can't trust him, why should we?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw; Cachelot; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; Lent; GregB; ..
If you'd like to be on this middle east/political ping list, please FR mail me.

High Volume. Articles on Israel can also be found by clicking on the Topic or Keyword Israel. or WOT [War on Terror]

----------------------------

Possibly significant as Israel collects taxes for the PA, which might give victims better access to assets than they've had for judgements from other countries.

3 posted on 07/17/2007 7:33:21 AM PDT by SJackson (isolationism never was, never will be acceptable response to[expansionist] tyrannical governments)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

The court also ruled that lawsuits against Enron, Eastern Airlines, Westinghouse, and the Pennsylvania Railroad can go forward.


4 posted on 07/17/2007 7:40:55 AM PDT by jiggyboy (Ten per cent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Little Ray
WooHoo! Sue ‘em for all the (taxpayer) money President Bush is sending them! I think its $990 million.

Victims have received judgements in US courts, as I understand it they don't have the ability to tap aid money. I presume it never touches US bank accounts. Perhaps they'll have access to PA taxes in Israel.

5 posted on 07/17/2007 7:57:38 AM PDT by SJackson (isolationism never was, never will be acceptable response to[expansionist] tyrannical governments)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jiggyboy

Unlike the companies you mention, the PA has substantial assets from which to pay judgements or to be attached, the problem is getting to them. US and EU foreign aid has been out of reach thus far. Since Israel collects their taxes, it’s possible victims could get to that.


6 posted on 07/17/2007 8:00:11 AM PDT by SJackson (isolationism never was, never will be acceptable response to[expansionist] tyrannical governments)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
Since Israel collects their taxes, it’s possible victims could get to that.

Those taxes are obviously the target. I hope that the transfer of revenue is subjected to multiple restraining orders being in the next few weeks, as Israeli victims and their surviving families bring suit.

7 posted on 07/17/2007 10:18:57 AM PDT by Ancesthntr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Sounds good to me.


8 posted on 07/17/2007 10:58:46 AM PDT by Kevmo (We should withdraw from Iraq -- via Tehran. And Duncan Hunter is just the man to get that job done.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Don’t think that the Israeli families will ever see a cent from the PA, regardless of the undeniable merit of their claims. What will force the PA to pay? Would there be any negative consequences for them if they didn’t?


9 posted on 07/18/2007 1:49:22 PM PDT by justiceseeker93
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson