Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kids taking immigration quest to D.C.
Miami Herald ^ | July 17, 2007 | CASEY WOODS

Posted on 07/17/2007 2:16:57 PM PDT by AuntB

An activist goes to D.C. to fight for the rights of U.S.-born children of illegal immigrants.

With no immigration overhaul in sight in Congress, immigration advocates have joined a South Florida activist's quixotic quest to persuade the U.S. Supreme Court to stop deporting the undocumented parents of American-born children.

Today, Nora Sandigo and a passel of kids -- including 8-year-old Saul Arellano, who has drawn international attention since his mother took refuge in a Chicago church last year to escape deportation -- will march on Washington. They will rally in front of Congress and the White House and stand on the steps of the Supreme Court in an effort to draw attention to the American children of illegal immigrants.

Sandigo, executive director of Sweetwater-based American Fraternity, has filed a class-action lawsuit on behalf of more than 600 children, arguing their right to have their parents with them outweighs the government's prerogative to deport those who violated U.S. immigration law.

''There are so many people detained, so many destroyed marriages, so many children without fathers and mothers,'' Sandigo, 42, said before heading to Washington. ``It is completely destroying the base of society, which is family.''

Several immigration lawyers said they are skeptical the justices will hear the case -- much less rule in the children's favor.

Close-the-border advocates, meanwhile, point to it as another example of undocumented immigrants overstepping their rights.

''I think it's sad that these advocates would use the children as pawns to push their agenda through a scheme that is nothing more than a publicity stunt,'' said Carlos Espinosa, spokesman for U.S. Rep. Tom Tancredo, R-Colo., a vocal advocate for increased immigration enforcement. ``This case will get laughed out of the courts.''

Even if the case's legal merits appear on shaky ground, Sandigo, a naturalized U.S. citizen from Nicaragua, remains undeterred.

''She has such a big heart, and is so positive,'' said Honduran immigrant Bilma Rivera, 36, whose Nicaraguan husband was deported to his homeland last year. ``My son's future is here, and I want to find a way for our family to be together.''

Rivera's 5-year-old son, Roger Castillo, is a plaintiff in the lawsuit.

The case argues that the deportation of undocumented parents is often de facto deportation of their children, and asks the court to establish the children's legal standing to request a stay of those deportations.

''We believe the constitutional right of children to their parents outweighs the statutory rules and regulations handed down by immigration,'' said Donald Schlemmer, a Washington-based lawyer who helped draft the motion. ``We're not saying this is going to be an easy case, but these children have the right to have this question answered in the Supreme Court.''

Other immigration lawyers say the case faces a hard road.

Miami attorney Ira Kurzban thinks it would be difficult to convince the Supreme Court to hear the lawsuit because it was filed directly with the high court, rather than rising through the lower courts first. ''It's very tough to win a case like this,'' he said.

Sandigo and her legal team -- led by American Fraternity President Alfonso Oviedo -- first filed the case last year in federal court in Miami, but then withdrew it to file directly to the Supreme Court, believing only the high court has jurisdiction.

Miami immigration lawyer Tammy Fox-Isicoff said the lawsuit is fundamentally flawed.

''I'm sure this was motivated by the attorneys wanting to do something for people in a helpless situation, but . . . there is not a shred of legal merit to this case,'' she said. ``Maybe this was a last-ditch effort to get publicity for the situation.''

Sandigo is a petite woman, armed with three cellphones and an inexhaustible capacity to hawk her cause. She prods local officials to declare their cities immigrant sanctuaries, verbally flays Republican and Democratic lawmakers for their failure to pass immigration revisions and attends local immigration events -- often with a handful of the children she's representing in tow.

She also occasionally hijacks other people's news conferences. At a February event called by U.S. Reps. Lincoln and Mario Díaz-Balart to push for immigration changes, Sandigo appeared with several children, including a teenager whose mother had recently been detained.

Sandigo nudged the sobbing boy onto the stage, where a bemused Lincoln Díaz-Balart handed him the microphone to tell his story as TV cameras rolled.

Advocates joining Sandigo in Washington today are similarly determined.

''We have a good case, and this is the best time to do it because there's no other alternative for millions of families,'' said Emma Lozano, head of the Chicago-based People Without Borders. ``If we don't do something, there's going to be massive deportations and separations of families.''

Lozano's husband is the pastor at the church where Saul Arellano's mother, Elvira, still lives, nearly a year after she sought sanctuary there. Lozano is bringing Saul and about 100 other children to the capital by bus to march with Sandigo.

''It's going to be all children, pure like a song of angels,'' Sandigo said. ``We want the justices to put their hand on their hearts and over their consciences and understand that this country isn't protecting the most fragile American citizens.''


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aliens; anchorbabies; immigrantlist; immigration; scotus; supremecourt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last
14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution: Civil Rights (1868) Passed by Congress June 13, 1866, and ratified July 9, 1868, the 14th amendment extended liberties and rights granted by the Bill of Rights to former slaves.

http://www.historicaldocuments.com/14thAmendment.htm

The bill was authored by Sen. Jacob Howard.

As a Senator, Howard is credited with working closely with Abraham Lincoln in drafting and passing the Thirteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which abolished slavery.

During Reconstruction Howard participated in debate over the first clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, arguing for including the phrase and subject to the jurisdiction thereof specifically because he wanted to make clear that the simple accident of birth in the United States was not sufficient to justify citizenship. Howard said: [The 14th amendment] will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens, who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers accredited to the government of the United States, but will include very other class of person

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacob_M._Howard

1 posted on 07/17/2007 2:16:59 PM PDT by AuntB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: gubamyster; HiJinx; SwinneySwitch

Jackpot baby ping.


2 posted on 07/17/2007 2:36:09 PM PDT by AuntB (" It takes more than walking across the border to be an American." Duncan Hunter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AuntB

My recollection: when I was in federal law enforcement during the 60’s there was an epidemic of foreign nationals coming here out the Caribbean countries, 1. marrying a US citizen to get a Green Card and then disappearing into the cesspool of NYC or 2. women getting pregnant, trying to obtain Green Cards on basis of child born in US.

It seems to me the INS regs then required they wait until the child was 18 years old before they could claim any legal US status.

It is time now to pass necessary laws stating clearly that children born of foreign nationals here illegally or temporarily on visas/work permits, not be granted US citizenship but remain citizens of the country where their parents were born.

Anyone on this network with congessional influence should find sponsors for such a bill and get it into the hopper asap.


3 posted on 07/17/2007 2:37:19 PM PDT by elpadre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AuntB

Anchors away! Far away!


4 posted on 07/17/2007 2:38:07 PM PDT by Sybeck1 (It's the Border, Stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AuntB
Tell you what, kids;

If you wan't to be with your criminal parents...we'll help you immigrate to their home countries - to which they are being rightfully deported.

5 posted on 07/17/2007 2:38:20 PM PDT by MrEdd (L. Ron Gore creator of "Fry-n-tology" the global warming religion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AuntB
Tell you what, kids;

If you wan't to be with your criminal parents...we'll help you immigrate to their home countries - to which they are being rightfully deported.

6 posted on 07/17/2007 2:38:22 PM PDT by MrEdd (L. Ron Gore creator of "Fry-n-tology" the global warming religion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AuntB

One can always hope that it ends up in the courts and a more sane interpretation of the 14th is rendered.

Well, one can always hope. Just don’t hold your breath.


7 posted on 07/17/2007 2:55:04 PM PDT by Ingtar (The LDS problem that Romney is facing is not his religion, but his Lacking Decisive Stands.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AuntB

``If we don’t do something, there’s going to be massive deportations and separations of families.’’

Let’s hope so.

Why would anybody think this is any more valid an argument than could be made for any other criminal ? It’s like saying, “You can’t send a father to jail for robbing a bank ! You’d be separating him from his family ! A child’s right to have their father present is more important than the right of the state to punish the crime of bank robbing !”

Pathetic.


8 posted on 07/17/2007 2:59:12 PM PDT by Kellis91789 (Liberals aren't atheists. They worship government -- including human sacrifices.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AuntB
Sandigo, executive director of Sweetwater-based American Fraternity, has filed a class-action lawsuit on behalf of more than 600 children, arguing their right to have their parents with them outweighs the government's prerogative to deport those who violated U.S. immigration law.

To listen to my mother, children HAVE no rights. Those are reserved for grown-ups, who presumably earn them by growing up.
9 posted on 07/17/2007 3:02:42 PM PDT by Xenalyte (Lord, I apologize . . . and be with the starving pygmies in New Guinea amen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AuntB

It’s the Children’s Crusade!!!!


10 posted on 07/17/2007 3:06:08 PM PDT by Experiment 6-2-6 (Admn Mods: tiny, malicious things that glare and gibber from dark corners.They have pins and dolls..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AuntB
I thought that the SCOTUS ruled fairly recently (last 5 or 10 years) on this very subject.IIRC they ruled that being an illegal with a US citizen child doesn't give you (the illegal) to stay here.

Perhaps I'm thinking of a Circuit Court ruling.

11 posted on 07/17/2007 3:09:06 PM PDT by Gay State Conservative (If martyrdom is so cool,why does Osama Obama go to such great lengths to avoid it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AuntB
you (the illegal) to stay here=you (the illegal) the right to stay here.
12 posted on 07/17/2007 3:10:11 PM PDT by Gay State Conservative (If martyrdom is so cool,why does Osama Obama go to such great lengths to avoid it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AuntB

I refuse to let my tax dollars go to support people who are in this country illegally.


13 posted on 07/17/2007 3:29:21 PM PDT by popdonnelly (Our first responsibility is to keep the power of the Presidency out of the hands of the Clintons.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1_Inch_Group; 2sheep; 2Trievers; 3AngelaD; 3pools; 3rdcanyon; 4Freedom; 4ourprogeny; 7.62 x 51mm; ..

ping


14 posted on 07/17/2007 3:30:41 PM PDT by gubamyster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AuntB

What good is an anchor baby if you don’t get him out there hustling some stupid liberals for you?


15 posted on 07/17/2007 3:59:39 PM PDT by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AuntB
*Sob*

*Sniffle*

This is just so heart rending

All these poor little childrens, victims of the mean Americans and their stupid, iggorant laws

*Sob*

*Boo Hoo*

*Sniffle Sniffle Blubber*

Yawn....more illegal alien sob stories and baby waving

16 posted on 07/17/2007 4:06:39 PM PDT by Regulator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AuntB

I’m sick to death of illegal invaders who drop babies to hold up as human shields against deportation!


17 posted on 07/17/2007 4:16:46 PM PDT by Travis McGee (--- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AuntB

Does this come under child abuse?

if I dragged 6y00 childfren to DC in order to attempt to influence Congress and/or the Supreme Court unduly, I think I would be charged with something...

The illegal alien problem concerns adults and adult criminal behavior...prior to the birth od the children...

I would hope theuy not onlt do no0t have any standing in the courts..but that they will be severely censored for manipulating innocent children..

But if this case is heard by the SCOTUS...What a chance to revisit the 14th Amendment, and reverse the decision that has caused the amendment to be used to give birth-right American citizenship to the children of illegal aliens who do not “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” of the United States...the very ones who were among those excluded by the original provisions and intent...


18 posted on 07/17/2007 4:21:35 PM PDT by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AuntB
Following the 'logic' of this lawsuit, then all jails and prisons should be emptied as the criminal is being separated from his family while incarcerated.

Yep, that's sure a winning argument.

19 posted on 07/17/2007 4:31:04 PM PDT by Condor51 (Rudy makes John Kerry look like a Right Wing 'Gun Nut' Extremist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AuntB

“It’s going to be all children, pure like a song of angels,’’ Sandigo said. ``We want the justices to put their hand on their hearts and over their consciences and understand that this country isn’t protecting the most fragile American citizens.”

Does she intend to go to DC to argue for the millions of unborn REAL American babies?

No? Then dont waste your time lady...

The unborn American babies are the only “most fragile American citizens” “that this country isn’t protecting”


20 posted on 07/17/2007 4:33:54 PM PDT by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson