THREE HIT COMBO!
lol
Posted on 07/17/2007 10:21:03 PM PDT by goldstategop
If you want to stay on the good side of racist David Duke, be sure you don't cross the beloved memory of the godfather of terrorism, Yasser Arafat.
That was the lesson WND learned Thursday when Jerusalem bureau chief Aaron Klein reported one of Arafat's confidantes, Ahmed Jibril, confirmed a French medical report on the cause of his death cited AIDS.
That was enough to set off the Duke machine, which came to the rescue of Arafat's manhood.
"The WND article by Aaron Klein, which came out of the Jerusalem office of WorldNetDaily, couldn't possibly be ZIONIST PROPAGANDA, could it?" the article asked.
Well, since Jibril, the head of Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine-General Command terrorist group, originally made the statement on Hezbollah's Manar TV in Lebanon, it would seem like a pretty sophisticated piece of Zionist disinformation.
The writer for WhiteCivilRights.com, the website of the European America Unity and Rights Organization, Duke's new front, went on to set the record straight.
(Column continues below)
"Yasser Arafat was killed by a mystery poison by Israel assassins," he explained. "David Duke was almost killed by a very exotic poison most likely served up on an El Al flight after Duke took a trip to Palestine. That's how the Zionists like to kill high-profile enemies – discreetly."
The racists at WhiteCivilRights.com go on to explain why Arafat could never have died of AIDS, explaining:
* There would have been suggestions of the problem before he died. (There were.)
* Arafat couldn't have died of AIDS because he was overweight.
* Arafat was married to a young trophy wife, so he was obviously heterosexual.
Why is the David Duke machine defending the legacy of one of the biggest mass murderers in history?
Because it's what sick racists do. It's what they always do.
Why do I take the time to respond to the slimy drivel that oozes from the oral orifices of Klansmen and neo-Nazis like Duke?
Because I think it illuminates the character of our real enemy. I think it says something about Duke that he would defend Arafat and something about Arafat that he would be defended in death by Duke.
I think it is worth noting that, like Adolf Hitler before them, the Klansmen and the neo-Nazis are still defending and supporting the Islamo-fascists. Yes, it was Hitler who supported them in the 1930s, and it was the Islamo-fascists (Arafat's "uncle," Haj Amin al-Husseini, the grand mufti of Jerusalem, being the key contact) who supported Hitler and his agenda for eradication of the Jews.
It should surprise no one when we see David Duke speaking at anti-Jewish, anti-American conferences in Iran. And it should surprise no one to witness Duke and his minions defending the legacy of Yasser Arafat.
In fact, it is actions like these that permit Duke and his racists to suggest they are not really anti-Semitic. After all, they explain, Arabs, too, are Semites, being descendants of Noah's son, Shem.
I call that "Shemantics."
Duke and the Nazis before him had no more use for Arabs and Muslims than they had for anyone but their so-called Aryan brotherhood. Muslims and Arabs were and are seen by them as allies of convenience. Give them half a chance and remove the common enemies of Jews and Christians and the Nazis and Muslims, even with their shared ideology of fascism, would be killing each in new and depraved ways – their shared specialty.
Anyway, I'm proud to be a part of a news agency under siege from the David Dukes of the world.
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
For HMOsexuals such as arafat, those trophy wives are called “beards” by the team arafat batted for..
David Duke sounds like he’s suffering from poofter envy.
I always remember that video of Yasser Arafat not too long before he died, kissing (or trying to kiss) one of his associates hands, and the guy very forcefully pulling his hand away. That told me all I needed to know right there. He didn’t want those infected camel lips slobbering all over him.
Ping.
Persia was changed Iran in the mid-30s by the then Shah, who admired Hitler, Iran is essentially Farsi for “Land of the Aryans.”
About a year ago, I heard some Commie call Bush “Hitler.” I thought that was really stupid so that made me look into WHY Bush would be equated to Hitler... That really invoked lots of emotion... I had a priest in Catholic school who was in camps & it’s rumored that one of my aunt’s moms was in Auschwitz. Also, we have a lot of Nazi groups that have been in the Chicago area so I figured go directly to the source! I also did a little googling on Nazis in America and decided to do a study on the White groups here in the US. It’s now a year and a half later and I’m writing a report on this topic. Here’s some info I gathered...
From what I’ve heard, Nazis don’t like Duke b/c he stole a ton of money from some other group (& Duke makes idiotic statements like the above!!). They also don’t like the Klan either. Also, “the Klan” isn’t 1 group. It’s a bunch of little groups fighting each other. Anyone can start a klan. Most “Klaners” claim to be Christian Identity (which is really odd) while most Nazis I encountered were either Christian or Odinist. Also, Nazis were White Nationalists, basically meaning that they wanted to live separately from the other races b/c they wanted to enhance their own race (which is not the blue eyed, blonde but ALL Whites) while Klaners were White Supremacists who believed they were superior to other races. Nazis also are more political while the Klan seemed to just like to yell White power and racial slurs. In one Nazi rally I saw the MC take a microphone away from someone who said a racial slur. Also, the Nazis had a political platform that was quite conservative yet very socialist (scary!) at the same time... In fact, some were ex-Republicans who got fed up with PC and fit the “Angry White male” description. Also, Nazis are not always skinheads. Nazis looked down on the skinheads who sold drugs to White kids and committed acts of violence. Most Nazis had hair, some had long hair. They also consider women to be equal while Klaners do not. Many nazis I met had at least a Bachelors degree and were hard working. The Klaners, well, fit the stereotype.
I have to admit, majority of the people I met were really salt of the Earth folks and do not fit the mean stereotype portrayed in Hollywood. Most were good-natured people, average and believed 100% in what they are doing. They were also quite paranoid, many were ego-centric, came from abusive homes, and heavilly into conspiracy theories. One guy, a former Communist!, got thrown out of the Nazi group and started his own and I found him to be totally offensive. I would not want to be on their bad side! The Nazi group I spoke with most was committed to 100% legal actions ONLY and made it a point to state that fact many times. They were friendly to me and I appreciate that. My door was always opened, my chair always pulled out, my dinner bill paid, and I always felt safe with them around. There are two Nazis out of 100 I met I would never trust but hey, how many Republicans can you say that about?? I liked maybe 2 of the 100 Klaners I met, the rest I couldn’t stand.
Also, the Nazis I spoke with did not like Iran any more than Israel. Most were very articulate, well educated, and argued their positions well. Klaners were not articulate and tended to fit the stereotype.
Though even Nazis could not change my outlook on things, they did encourage me to think about rather than merely accept what the GOP & society were saying is truth. It made me a stronger Conservative Republican at a time when many Republicans have lost hope. I thank them for that.
It sounds like you have Nazi-envy
I hope you’re not calling me a Nazi just because I did research on them!
You sure sounded really fond of them. It almost sounded like you were ready to pick out a china pattern with them.
One thing I need to mention... some Nazis did have criminal backgrounds, some did not. The only crime that could be committed that would cause someone to not be allowed membership would be sex crimes or crimes against women and children. The Klan was not as selective.
Also, just because I didn’t paint them as evil conniving individuals, does not mean that I support what they do! OMG! Most were from abusive homes or very confused! There are 25 points of National Socialism and if you read them, you’d see that they are totally against what the country stands for and are as dangerous to liberty as the Communist Manifesto.
THREE HIT COMBO!
lol
>>You sure sounded really fond of them. It almost sounded like you were ready to pick out a china pattern with them.
Actually, no. I was pointing out that the people were nice to me & not the Hollywood stereotype. What you are saying is part of WHY I did this study in the first place. A lot of what the Nazis say can be very appealing to Conservatives. They are against abortion & gun control and for a society that is values-based. It would be VERY easy for Conservatives who are disenfranchised by the current GOP to go that way. Germans fell for the same rhetoric back after WWI when their currency deflated to practically nothing and a “savior” arose that they believed would rid them of all their problems. It’s like history repeating itself.
The devil takes a pleasing form. Conservatives need to understand that Nazis are out actively recruiting them & that they are trying to look appealing to Conservatives. They are now talking about the illegal problem just like the Nazis did about the Jews after WWI. The Nazis have a very dark side to them and I do not admire what they stand for.
Why would 2 groups who hate Jews and want them to be exterminated be strange bedfellows i wonder?
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
The Nazis are fixated on one thing: Jews. Everything surrounds that one obsession. No matter what they believe, it will change in an instant depending on where the Jews land on the issue.
Exactly! That’s why when I saw this thread I wanted to point out that there are differences between nazis and klan as well as the Islamofascists. People don’t understand that there are differences in their attitudes. One common point in the White power movement is that there will one day be some big race war. Yeah right. IF by some wacky twist of fate, the White power folks won their war, the nazis and klan would turn on each other and also kill the Whites who disagree with their all-White policies. They refer to these folks as “race traitors.”
AppyPappy, you hit the nail on the head. American Nazis do consider everything to be tied to a Zionist conspiracy. They hate Jews because they blame them for not having enough money etc when really it’s their fault for not going to college etc. They are also obsessed with the New World Order but seem to want to impose their own?? Do you understand what I mean - it seems like a bunch of paradoxes. These people, American nazis, actually believe this to be true. They are people who treated me nicely when I interviewed them and actually said things Conservatives agree with (ie pro-life, pro-gun, rapists should be shot, etc) but in fact are pushing a horrid agenda.
NWO = Jews. It’s just a code word for Jews.
They may say “rapists should be shot” but they mean “except Arabs raping Jews”. Nazis hate Jews, people who look like Jews and people who like Jews. They even hate secret Jews like the Jews that control Bush/Cheney. Jews, Jews, Jews.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.