Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Executive Order: Blocking Property of Certain Persons Who Threaten Stabilization Efforts in Iraq
The Whitehouse ^ | today | W

Posted on 07/19/2007 1:17:36 PM PDT by Rodney King

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, as amended (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.)(IEEPA), the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.)(NEA), and section 301 of title 3, United States Code,

I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States of America, find that, due to the unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States posed by acts of violence threatening the peace and stability of Iraq and undermining efforts to promote economic reconstruction and political reform in Iraq and to provide humanitarian assistance to the Iraqi people, it is in the interests of the United States to take additional steps with respect to the national emergency declared in Executive Order 13303 of May 22, 2003, and expanded in Executive Order 13315 of August 28, 2003, and relied upon for additional steps taken in Executive Order 13350 of July 29, 2004, and Executive Order 13364 of November 29, 2004. I hereby order:

Section 1. (a) Except to the extent provided in section 203(b)(1), (3), and (4) of IEEPA (50 U.S.C. 1702(b)(1), (3), and (4)), or in regulations, orders, directives, or licenses that may be issued pursuant to this order, and notwithstanding any contract entered into or any license or permit granted prior to the date of this order, all property and interests in property of the following persons, that are in the United States, that hereafter come within the United States, or that are or hereafter come within the possession or control of United States persons, are blocked and may not be transferred, paid, exported,

withdrawn, or otherwise dealt in: any person determined by the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Defense,

(i) to have committed, or to pose a significant risk of committing, an act or acts of violence that have the purpose or effect of:

(A) threatening the peace or stability of Iraq or the Government of Iraq; or

(B) undermining efforts to promote economic reconstruction and political reform in Iraq or to provide humanitarian assistance to the Iraqi people;

(ii) to have materially assisted, sponsored, or provided financial, material, logistical, or technical support for, or goods or services in support of, such an act or acts of violence or any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order; or

(iii) to be owned or controlled by, or to have acted or purported to act for or on behalf of, directly or indirectly, any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order.

(b) The prohibitions in subsection (a) of this section include, but are not limited to, (i) the making of any contribution or provision of funds, goods, or services by, to, or for the benefit of any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order, and (ii) the

receipt of any contribution or provision of funds, goods, or services from any such person.

Sec. 2. (a) Any transaction by a United States person or within the United States that evades or avoids, has the purpose

of evading or avoiding, or attempts to violate any of the prohibitions set forth in this order is prohibited.

(b) Any conspiracy formed to violate any of the prohibitions set forth in this order is prohibited.

Sec. 3. For purposes of this order:

(a) the term "person" means an individual or entity;

(b) the term "entity" means a partnership, association, trust, joint venture, corporation, group, subgroup, or other organization; and

(c) the term "United States person" means any United States citizen, permanent resident alien, entity organized under the laws of the United States or any jurisdiction within the United States (including foreign branches), or any person in the United States.

Sec. 4. I hereby determine that the making of donations of the type specified in section 203(b)(2) of IEEPA (50 U.S.C. 1702(b)(2)) by, to, or for the benefit of, any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order would seriously impair my ability to deal with the national emergency declared in Executive Order 13303 and expanded in Executive Order 13315, and I hereby prohibit such donations as provided by section 1 of this order.

Sec. 5. For those persons whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order who might have a constitutional presence in the United States, I find that, because of the ability to transfer funds or other assets

instantaneously, prior notice to such persons of measures to be taken pursuant to this order would render these measures ineffectual. I therefore determine that for these measures to be effective in addressing the national emergency declared in Executive Order 13303 and expanded in Executive Order 13315, there need be no prior notice of a listing or determination made pursuant to section 1(a) of this order.

Sec. 6. The Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Defense, is hereby authorized to take such actions, including the promulgation of rules and regulations, and to employ all powers granted to the President by IEEPA as may be necessary to carry out the purposes of this order. The Secretary of the Treasury may redelegate any of these functions to other officers and agencies of the United States Government, consistent with applicable law. All agencies of the United States Government are hereby directed to take all appropriate measures within their authority to carry out the provisions of this order and, where appropriate, to advise the Secretary of the Treasury in a timely manner of the measures taken.

Sec. 7. Nothing in this order is intended to affect the continued effectiveness of any rules, regulations, orders, licenses, or other forms of administrative action issued, taken, or continued in effect heretofore or hereafter under 31 C.F.R. chapter V, except as expressly terminated, modified, or suspended by or pursuant to this order.

Sec. 8. This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right, benefit, or privilege, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, instrumentalities, or entities, its officers or employees, or any other person.

GEORGE W. BUSH

THE WHITE HOUSE,

July 17, 2007.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: constitution; eo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-126 next last
To: frithguild
Would you translate please?

Garde la Foi, mes amis! Nous nous sommes les sauveurs de la République! Maintenant et Toujours!
(Keep the Faith, my friends! We are the saviors of the Republic! Now and Forever!)

LonePalm, le Républicain du verre cassé (The Broken Glass Republican)

81 posted on 07/19/2007 3:21:27 PM PDT by LonePalm (Commander and Chef)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HOTTIEBOY

“I am setting in a cubicle diagnosing a man’s computer fault codes in his car from 600 miles away and typing in a forum. Thats why I don’t judge things like this. Cawz I don’t know what or why it was done. I do know that it was done by people a hellofa lot smarter than me.”

And that amnesty thing! Those guys are so much smarter than us. And busting the federal budget. Because they are such freaking geniuses.


82 posted on 07/19/2007 4:43:39 PM PDT by GovernmentIsTheProblem (The GOP is "Whig"ing out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Rodney King
Executive Orders are typically implementation documents as to how the executive departments are going to actually implement and apply broad Congressional Acts through the departments.

The Iraq War resolutions, the WOT Acts and the financial acts passed against Muslim terrorism are very broadly written.

To actually seize the assets etc, the Departments need procedures. Those procedures are always outline in Executive Orders for these types of broad acts where the Executive is OBLIGATED to carry out the intent of the Legislative Branch, on-the-fly against changing circumstances.

The President with the EO is merely broadening other orders to hit (IMHO) those undermining the new government, where before it was only set up against the Muslim terror groups.

This whole thread is a tempest in a teapot. These EOs in the Clinton era were just as scary in the raw wording.

83 posted on 07/19/2007 4:44:40 PM PDT by KC Burke (Men of intemperate minds can never be free...their passions forge their fetters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling; Rodney King
...we should fight to have people in power who we trust with Unitary Executive Powers...

Did you really type that? OK, let me know when Jesus Christ is on the ballot, otherwise, you're nutz! Blackbird.

84 posted on 07/19/2007 5:14:01 PM PDT by BlackbirdSST (I'm dug in, giving no more ground to the rino stampede. BB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: BlackbirdSST
OK, let me know when Jesus Christ is on the ballot, otherwise, you're nutz!

Exactly.

85 posted on 07/19/2007 5:59:08 PM PDT by Rodney King (No, we can't all just get along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: BlackbirdSST
I take it you’ve never heard of Unitary Executive Theory?
86 posted on 07/19/2007 6:15:07 PM PDT by mnehring (Virtus Junxit Mors Non Separabit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling
I take it you’ve never heard of Unitary Executive Theory?

No, what I've never heard of is the kind of trust one would have to muster to believe in it. Blackbird.

87 posted on 07/19/2007 6:55:40 PM PDT by BlackbirdSST (I'm dug in, giving no more ground to the rino stampede. BB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: BlackbirdSST

If you’ve never heard of it, then how do you know “what kind of trust’ it gives?


88 posted on 07/20/2007 6:32:52 AM PDT by mnehring (Virtus Junxit Mors Non Separabit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: SubGeniusX; Abram; akatel; albertp; AlexandriaDuke; Alexander Rubin; Allosaurs_r_us; amchugh; ...
Libertarian ping! To be added or removed from my ping list freepmail me or post a message here.
89 posted on 07/20/2007 6:50:00 AM PDT by traviskicks (http://www.neoperspectives.com/Ron_Paul_2008.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling
If you’ve never heard of it, then how do you know “what kind of trust’ it gives?

"NO" meant your assumption was wrong, but you knew that. Blackbird.

90 posted on 07/20/2007 7:08:57 AM PDT by BlackbirdSST (I'm dug in, giving no more ground to the rino stampede. BB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Rodney King

This guy is WAY out of line on this.


91 posted on 07/20/2007 7:11:22 AM PDT by WhiteGuy (GOP Congress - 16,000 earmarks costing US $50 billion in 2006 - PAUL2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: absolootezer0
so he’s going after about half of congress, right?

Bush said once "if you're not for us, you're against us". Eagerly waiting for this to play out.

92 posted on 07/20/2007 7:13:47 AM PDT by Fitzcarraldo (Skip the Moon, go for Mars)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: taxcontrol

Hey, it works for the EPA. They don’t “take” your property, they just block you from using it. And we’re all for that, eh?


93 posted on 07/20/2007 7:15:57 AM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: frithguild; LonePalm

Ping me too when you get here Frith!

(is this because of Harry Reid pulling the defense funding???)


94 posted on 07/20/2007 7:20:43 AM PDT by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Rodney King

At first- I thought this was a joke.

I’m no lawyer- but this seems an extreme furtherance of...something that I don’t “get”. What is he REALLY doing here? And is it constitutional?


95 posted on 07/20/2007 7:25:50 AM PDT by SE Mom (Proud mom of an Iraq war combat vet -Fred'08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bahbah

What does this mean, actually?


96 posted on 07/20/2007 7:34:48 AM PDT by SE Mom (Proud mom of an Iraq war combat vet -Fred'08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: WhiteGuy

After re-reading..............

it sure seems that Präsident Busch has just given himself the power to freeze the assets of anyone whom he feels is a “threat” to his foreign policy, which could include any individual, company or organization that dares to speak out against his policies.

pretty scary, just ask yourself, do you want hillary to have this power?


97 posted on 07/20/2007 7:38:49 AM PDT by WhiteGuy (GOP Congress - 16,000 earmarks costing US $50 billion in 2006 - PAUL2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Rodney King

Scary. A lot of Saudi money could be impounded. Buy a horse before the rush, and take good care of. It may be a while before we get the cajones to seize their oil fields...


98 posted on 07/20/2007 7:46:36 AM PDT by tracer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rodney King

“The question is, who decides who is helping terrorists?”


The self-proclaimed “Decider”. And to those who think anyone who questions this E.O. is a terrorist sympathiser, guilty of “Sedition”, etc, just remember, if this isn’t struck down, a Dem president can do it just as easily in the future.

“Alex, I’ll take Bananna Republics for $500, please”


99 posted on 07/20/2007 7:52:06 AM PDT by BritExPatInFla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: taxcontrol

The connection to the Fifth Amendment can be summarized in two words and three letters: “tax returns” and “IRS”...


100 posted on 07/20/2007 7:52:34 AM PDT by tracer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-126 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson