To: 75thOVI; AFPhys; Alice in Wonderland; AndrewC; aristotleman; Avoiding_Sulla; BenLurkin; Berosus; ...
This is part of the anti-impact / catastrophic extinction public relations offensive which has been going on for a while. Thanks indcons.
11 posted on
07/20/2007 10:02:42 AM PDT by
SunkenCiv
(Profile updated Wednesday, July 18, 2007. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: SunkenCiv
This is part of the anti-impact / catastrophic extinction public relations offensive which has been going on for a while. You think this fossil discovery is part of a public relations offensive? There have been a number of catastrophic extinction events in our planet's history. The emergence of the dinosaurs just doesn't seem to be linked to one.
22 posted on
07/20/2007 12:02:25 PM PDT by
Alter Kaker
(Gravitation is a theory, not a fact. It should be approached with an open mind...)
To: SunkenCiv
http://geoweb.princeton.edu/people/faculty/keller/chicxpage1.html
1. Chicxulub predates the KT boundary and is not the cause for the end-Cretaceous mass extinction: Evidence from NE Mexico
FYI
23 posted on
07/20/2007 6:23:10 PM PDT by
Fred Nerks
(Fair dinkum!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
