Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Official: Chinese forests contribute a lot to absorbing world's CO2 (really?)
Xinhua ^ | 07/17/07

Posted on 07/20/2007 7:43:41 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster

Official: Chinese forests contribute a lot to absorbing world's CO2

www.chinaview.cn 2007-07-17 21:02:36

BEIJING, July 17 (Xinhua) -- China's forest coverage has risen constantly for almost two decades, increasing the nation's contribution to the world's carbon dioxide absorption, Zhu Lieke, deputy director of the State Forestry Administration (SFA), said on Tuesday.

The world's forested area decreased by about 0.2 percent annually or 9.39 million hectares between 1990 and 2000, said Zhu, citing statistics from the Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations.

However, forests in China had been growing by 1.2 percent or 1.81 million hectares every year in the same period, the highest growth rate in the world, said Zhu at a press conference.

The expanding forests had enabled the country to absorb more carbon dioxide every year.

Chinese experts estimated carbon dioxide absorbed by China's forests had risen from 470 million tons in 1990 to more than 500 million tons currently.

China led the world in forestation with 54 million hectares of cultivated forest, said SFA chief Jia Zhibang at the press conference.

Since the drive for voluntary tree-planting and forestation 26 years ago, the Chinese people had planted 49.2 billion trees, he added.

The country's forest coverage was 18.21 percent or 175 million hectares, and its commodity timber coverage stood at 13.6 billion cubic meters, which would grow by 500 million cubic meters annually, Jia said.

Research showed every new cubic meter of forest absorbed 1.83 tons of carbon dioxide and emitted 1.62 tons of oxygen on average.

Jia said the government would continue to fight global warming by reducing greenhouse gas emissions in the industrial sector and stepping up forestation to absorb more carbon dioxide in the future.

The country would endeavor to double the annual growth of forests in 30 to 50 years to 1 billion cubic meters, Jia said.

He also pledged to better protect the country's forests, wetlands and woodlands, which could help absorb carbon dioxide as well.

He said 22 million hectares of land vulnerable to desertification would be brought under control, and half of the country's wetlands, about 18 million hectares, would be properly preserved by 2010.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: agw; china; co2; forest; tlr

1 posted on 07/20/2007 7:43:45 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster; maui_hawaii; tallhappy; Dr. Marten; Jeff Head; Tainan; hedgetrimmer; ...

Ping!


2 posted on 07/20/2007 7:44:19 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster (kim jong-il, chia head, ppogri, In Grim Reaper we trust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

And what about US forests. We don’t get credit for our huge forests in the whole bogus “carbon footprint” equation.


3 posted on 07/20/2007 7:45:10 AM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Well cut ‘em down so we can get on with the Global Warming show.


4 posted on 07/20/2007 7:56:20 AM PDT by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Source is the Chinese Pravda... Hmmm

TRUTH IS PROPAGANDA!


5 posted on 07/20/2007 7:56:36 AM PDT by Sir Hailstone (Graduate of The Archie Bunker School of Conservatism [http://digitalfarmers.blogspot.com])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: samtheman
Sam,
Have not you heard from the UN and the leftists of the world? It does not matter what the US does. We are a free and capitalist nation, therefore nothing we do (except surrender and pay the UN money) is ever good. I mean, if the left acknowledged all the good the USA really does (most of which rescues people from totalitarians and socialism's many failures) then the remaining facade of socialism crumbles to a few core believers.

And there are not enough grief counselors in Berkeley to handle that.

On a more serious note. Nothing China says here is verifiable as to forestation coverage. Also, they produce far more pollution than the USA and that pollution is far more toxic, but that part does not get reported.

6 posted on 07/20/2007 8:00:25 AM PDT by M1Tanker (Proven Daily: Modern "progressive" liberalism is just National Socialism without the "twisted cross")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
He said 22 million hectares of land vulnerable to desertification would be brought under control

Random thought: Shouldn't we be encouraging desertification, since it would increase surface albedo (and thus decrease absorption of radiation)?

7 posted on 07/20/2007 8:17:02 AM PDT by Constitutionalist Conservative (Global Warming Heretic -- http://agw-heretic.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
Heart-warming news from the wonderful Chi-Comms!

Oops, they forgot to mention the massive poisoning of the air, soils, and waterways, must've slipped their minds. Good thing they have shrubbery, though, that'll help.

8 posted on 07/20/2007 9:06:26 AM PDT by mallardx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson