Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Defend the Second

I’d take a Stonewall Jackson over a R.E. Lee as a general.


58 posted on 07/21/2007 9:22:39 PM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: PAR35
I’d take a Stonewall Jackson over a R.E. Lee as a general.

Great. You take Jackson, I'll take Lee, and I'll beat you every time.

87 posted on 07/22/2007 9:23:54 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur (Save Fredericksburg. Support CVBT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

To: PAR35
I’d take a Stonewall Jackson over a R.E. Lee as a general.

I'd take both, please. Armies need both the master strategist and the battlefield commander -- like Marshall and Patton decades later.

97 posted on 07/22/2007 10:42:24 AM PDT by ReignOfError (`)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

To: PAR35

‘I’d take a Stonewall Jackson over a R.E. Lee as a general.’

Many would, because the war would have ended much sooner.

The outcome would have been the same.


134 posted on 07/23/2007 12:01:01 PM PDT by Badeye (You know its a kook site when they ban the word 'kook')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson