Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Inside the Ring [Why Bush wanted Dubai Port deal]
Washington Times ^ | July 20, 2007 | Bill Gertz

Posted on 07/20/2007 7:19:48 PM PDT by plain talk

Former Inside the Ring co-author Rowan Scarborough has written a new book revealing a key reason the Bush administration pressed hard for the 2006 deal for the United Arab Emirates-based Dubai Ports World to take over management of several U.S. ports. According to Mr. Scarborough, the administration wanted the deal to go through because the UAE government had agreed to let the United States post agents inside its global port network who could report on world shipping.

Dubai Ports currently runs port facilities at key U.S. intelligence targets, including Venezuela, China, Pakistan, India and Saudi Arabia. "Dubai Ports, in essence, was going to become an agent of CIA," Mr. Scarborough said in an interview. "The arrangement is helping us detect whether any kind of terror contraband was being moved around." The management deal to run ports at New York, New Jersey, Philadelphia, Baltimore, New Orleans and Miami was initially approved by the Treasury Department-run Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States, but was eventually scuttled in 2006 after pressure from Congress. Both Republicans and Democrats raised concerns that the deal would affect U.S. port security since al Qaeda had used UAE as a major financial base for its terrorist network.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News
KEYWORDS: dubai; dubaiportsdeal; geopolitics; infiltration
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-104 last
To: lepton

If that is the case, why does he continue to cite Dubai ports in his litany of reasons why he is an independent thinker willing to criticize the GOP?


101 posted on 07/22/2007 7:47:13 AM PDT by soccermom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Rodney King

History will tell.


102 posted on 07/22/2007 11:57:25 AM PDT by TheThinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: jwh_Denver

“What did Rush say? The last I remember he was against the whole thing.”

Unlike the ‘knee jerk’ pundits/talkers, Rush recognized the strategic advantage of the Dubai deal from the beginning . . . He was never against the deal.


103 posted on 07/24/2007 12:25:29 PM PDT by DrDeb (IF STANDING FOR LIBERTY IN THE WORLD MAKES ME A DISSIDENT, I WEAR THAT TITLE WITH PRIDE. GWB -07)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: DrDeb

You’ve jogged my memory, you’re right. Thanks for replying.


104 posted on 07/24/2007 1:43:23 PM PDT by jwh_Denver (In the Rise and Fall of United States I hope the Fall part is more than one chapter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-104 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson