Replies

OBAMA SAYS PREVENTING GENOCIDE IS NOT A GOOD REASON TO STAY IN IRAQ — ????????

I think he ought to go over to Baghdad and ask the Iraqis what they think about that.

In an Associated Press article that published on Breitbart, Obama says “United States cannot use its military to solve humanitarian problems and that preventing a potential genocide in Iraq isn’t a good enough reason to keep U.S. forces there.”
(read article at: http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D8QGF5700&show_article=1)

It’s a good thing Obama wasn’t around when the U.S. forces went into the death camps in Germany and Poland and stopped the genocide there. To have it Obama’s way, the Jews probably would all have been murdered instead of just six million.

That’s okay. Keep on talking Mr. Obama. The more you talk, the more the voters of this country will see you as the uncaring, sinister fake that you truly are.

You’ll never get my vote. And hopefully the thousands who read this column will agree with me, not you.

You and politicians like you are also the reason so many died in Ruwanda. Read “Left to Tell” by one of the survivors. Shame on the United States for not supporting between 800,000 to 1,000,000 of the Tutsis from being hacked to death.

So only a much much much smaller scale, if I were walking down the streets of Chicago and about to get mugged, this illustrious senator would not interfere or try to stop a crime from being committed?

And how is a crime against a human being different from the collective crimes against humanity, as in genocide?