Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Should the DailyKos be Subject to the Federal Election Commission? [Hell no!!]
BC Magazine ^ | 7/23/07 | John Bambenek

Posted on 07/23/2007 6:30:32 PM PDT by indigo5

A complaint was filed against the Daily Kos for violating federal election rules. The filer writers on the story over at BC Magazine.:

Federal Election Commission rules apply for organizations that spend or contribute an equivalent of $1,000 per year in trying to influence elections for federal office. DailyKos is owned by Kos Media, a company, which makes it fit the definition of an organization. It surely spends at least $1,000 per year in hosting and based on what they charge (and get) for advertising, their support of candidates is certainly worth over $1,000 per year. Lastly, their self-identified purpose is to influence elections in the Democrats favor. They fit the criteria.

Some will argue that this is a slippery slope that will snare all bloggers. First, most bloggers aren't organizations. Second, most bloggers are read by like 3 people and their posts are certainly not worth $1,000. Third, most bloggers don't exist for the primary purpose of electing certain people to federal office.


(Excerpt) Read more at blogcritics.org ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: campaignfinance; dailykos; elections; fec; liberals
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-118 next last
Comment #21 Removed by Moderator

Comment #22 Removed by Moderator

To: indigo5

That is like asking, should we allow an insult and misreading of the First Amendment become the law of the land? Certainly not, for if we allow it, then the next forum they come for will be us, with the NutRoots blessing and cheering.


23 posted on 07/23/2007 7:58:57 PM PDT by theBuckwheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Not only no, but hell no! The first amendment protects our God-given unalienable rights to free speech, free press, freedom to dissent and freedom of association. All of the campaign laws enacted by congress in violation of the first amendment should be repealed as unconstitutional and the FEC disbanded.

Cannot say it better myself.

24 posted on 07/23/2007 8:04:52 PM PDT by steveegg (I am John Doe, and a monthly donor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Bushbacker1

You wanna try to win that argument against Democrats in Congress?

FR is pretty damn active in supporting candidates, publicizing campaign activities, mustering shows of activist support. Once the general election starts, FR will certainly be aggressive enough in supporting the Republican candidate.

Jim Robinson owns this site, sets the rules, moderates (or his “agents” do) the discussions. So it is not just a non-partisan bulleting board.

If you don’t think the Democrats can make an argument out of that, then you underestimate them.


25 posted on 07/23/2007 8:04:54 PM PDT by Maceman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: indigo5
Should the DailyKos be Subject to the Federal Election Commission?

I learned the answer to that one in elementary school. Public school, at that! We were introduced to an old document, known affectionately as The Bill of Rights. I didn't understand all of it at the time, but that freedom of speech part was pretty clear.

26 posted on 07/23/2007 8:06:33 PM PDT by BykrBayb (This tagline in memory of FReeper 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub ~ Þ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

I was thinking not so much as if, but what if?


27 posted on 07/23/2007 8:14:11 PM PDT by mnehring (Virtus Junxit Mors Non Separabit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: indigo5

How much coordination is there with the DNC? How much funding from Soros?


28 posted on 07/23/2007 8:14:55 PM PDT by weegee (NO THIRD TERM. America does not need another unconstitutional Clinton co-presidency.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: indigo5

First Amendment bump!


29 posted on 07/23/2007 8:22:02 PM PDT by Jean S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: postaldave
bump

the kos can kiss my but,I keep an eye on what their trying to do,as I do my elected officials.

30 posted on 07/23/2007 8:26:10 PM PDT by mdittmar (May God watch over those who serve,and have served,to keep us free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: indigo5
When I see this in breaking news at the kos, I will be surprised.

Should Free Republic be Subject to the Federal Election Commission? (Hell no!!)

31 posted on 07/23/2007 8:40:35 PM PDT by mdittmar (May God watch over those who serve,and have served,to keep us free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: indigo5
No, no, and no again.

Second, most bloggers are read by like 3 people and their posts are certainly not worth $1,000.

That isn't the point at all. It isn't the money. The point is shutting them down.

No. Negative. Uh-uh. Absolutely not. Nyet. That isn't a slippery slope, it's a crevasse.

32 posted on 07/23/2007 8:46:57 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: indigo5

Should Democrats be held to a standard? LMAO !!!


33 posted on 07/23/2007 8:47:19 PM PDT by Hoodat ( ETERNITY - Smoking, or Non-smoking?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar

More than likely the “complaint” was filed by one of their own dingbats to get free PR and make them feel important and all that stuff.


34 posted on 07/23/2007 8:49:05 PM PDT by Rome2000 (Peace is not an option)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Maceman
One could make the same claim about FR.

I doubt it. Kos has as a posted purpose "electing democrats to office". Not liberals, not progressives, but members of the Democratic Party.

In contrast, FR is certainly very conservative but doesn't (to my knowledge) support any particular party.

35 posted on 07/23/2007 8:56:42 PM PDT by BearCub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: BearCub

...my post above isn’t to say I support government intrusion on anyone’s first amendment rights. I’m just saying that as long as the FEC does, Kos is a different type of organization.


36 posted on 07/23/2007 8:58:37 PM PDT by BearCub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: MurryMom

Ewwwww - smells of corruption. Are you a member? Lemme guess...


37 posted on 07/23/2007 9:03:21 PM PDT by Libloather (That's just what I need - some two-bit, washed up, loser politician giving me weather forecasts...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BearCub

And that’s exactly why they are subject to the FEC. They self-identify their purpose as to elect Democrats. That makes them a political committee like any other. We can argue the merits of election law and there is plenty of debate to have there. However, right now the laws are what they are and they should apply to everyone equally.


38 posted on 07/23/2007 9:27:37 PM PDT by indigo5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: indigo5

Has everyone gone mad? This complaint is ridiculous. You have a right to speak freely and a right to assemble, and a right to do both at the same time.

I didn’t read anything in the Constitution regarding how long you could assemble or how many dollars your speech could be worth before the First Amendment expired.


39 posted on 07/23/2007 11:27:45 PM PDT by MIT-Elephant ("Armed with what? Spitballs?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BearCub
In contrast, FR is certainly very conservative but doesn't (to my knowledge) support any particular party.

FR will very definitely be supporting the Republican candidate against the Democrat candidate in the 2008 general election.

40 posted on 07/23/2007 11:31:25 PM PDT by Maceman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-118 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson