Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

HUNTER NAFTA SUPER HIGHWAY AMENDMENT PASSES HOUSE {Security and Prosperity Partnership)
Duncan Hunter website ^ | July 25, 2007

Posted on 07/26/2007 6:54:50 AM PDT by 3AngelaD

Washington, D.C. – Late last evening, Congressman Duncan Hunter (R-CA) successfully offered an amendment to H.R. 3074, the FY2008 Transportation Appropriations Act, prohibiting the use of federal funds for participation in working groups under the Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP), including the creation of the NAFTA Super Highway. The Hunter amendment gained strong bipartisan support, passing the House by a vote of 362 – 63.

“The proposed NAFTA Super Highway presents significant challenges to our nation’s security, the safety of vehicle motorists, and will likely drive down wages for American workers,” said Congressman Hunter. “Much like NAFTA, the super highway is designed to serve the interests of our trading partners and will lead to neither security nor prosperity.

“This 12 lane highway, which is already under construction in Texas, will fast-track thousands of cargo containers across the U.S. without adequate security. These containers will move from Mexico, a country with a record of corruption and involvement in the drug trade, across a border that is already porous and insufficiently protected.

“Unfortunately, very little is known about the NAFTA Super Highway. This amendment will provide Congress the opportunity to exercise oversight of the highway, which remains a subject of question and uncertainty, and ensure that our safety and security will not be comprised in order to promote the business interests of our neighbors.”

SPP working groups are advancing a plan to build the NAFTA Super Highway – an international corridor extending between the U.S., Mexico and Canada.


TOPICS: Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: aliens; b4dh; congress; conspiracy; duncanhunter; mexico; nafta; northamericanunion
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-128 next last

1 posted on 07/26/2007 6:54:52 AM PDT by 3AngelaD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 3AngelaD

God love him. He’s a true fighter.


2 posted on 07/26/2007 6:56:29 AM PDT by dforest (Duncan Hunter is the best hope we have on both fronts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 3AngelaD
“Much like NAFTA, the super highway is designed to serve the interests of our trading partners and will lead to neither security nor prosperity."

Protectionist nonsense.

3 posted on 07/26/2007 6:57:42 AM PDT by xjcsa (Hillary Clinton is nothing more than Karl Marx with huge calves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl; nicmarlo; texastoo; William Terrell; cinives; Czar; Borax Queen; janetgreen; Rockitz; ..

Of interest.


4 posted on 07/26/2007 6:57:59 AM PDT by hedgetrimmer (I'm a billionaire! Thanks WTO and the "free trade" system!--Hu Jintao top 10 worst dictators)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 3AngelaD
prohibiting the use of federal funds for participation in working groups under the Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP)

Really!?! The SPP is a White House deal (www.spp.gov is a White House sponsored website). Does this amendment defund the SPP? I wonder what the White House will say about this.

5 posted on 07/26/2007 6:58:08 AM PDT by Pete (Run, Vaclav, run!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: indylindy
Go Duncan! In the house your a national treasure. But your over reaching for upward mobility and that’s going to be your achilies heel
6 posted on 07/26/2007 7:00:03 AM PDT by Weeedley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 3AngelaD

Good job Hunter. Once again proving he serves the American people.


7 posted on 07/26/2007 7:01:09 AM PDT by cripplecreek (Greed is NOT a conservative ideal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 3AngelaD
[.. The Hunter amendment gained strong bipartisan support, passing the House by a vote of 362 – 63. ..]

Who are the 63?...
The White RINO House will not like this at all..

8 posted on 07/26/2007 7:01:21 AM PDT by hosepipe (CAUTION: This propaganda is laced with hyperbole....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Weeedley

Probably true.


9 posted on 07/26/2007 7:01:38 AM PDT by dforest (Duncan Hunter is the best hope we have on both fronts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 3AngelaD; davidosborne; pissant; KylaStarr; LucyT; Rushmore Rocks

Thank you Mr Hunter.

One of the few sane politicians we have!!!!


10 posted on 07/26/2007 7:02:13 AM PDT by WestCoastGal (Jr - You drive we'll follow! ~~FREE THE # 8~~Mountain Dew Code Red)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

What a patriot in a vale of RINOs and traitors.


11 posted on 07/26/2007 7:02:52 AM PDT by Diogenesis (Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: indylindy
His amendment only gives congress oversight of this debacle? Or is there more to his admendment than I got from this? Congress having oversight of anything is a worthless exercise.
12 posted on 07/26/2007 7:03:02 AM PDT by YellowRoseofTx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pete

“I wonder what the White House will say about this”
________________________________________________________

Prolly call all those opposed to SPP racists.


13 posted on 07/26/2007 7:03:04 AM PDT by Roccus (Able Danger??? What's an Able Danger?????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: xjcsa

Protectionist nonsense to require oversight and transparency to a program that did its best to deliberately remain under the radar? You don’t think we the people have a right to know what the heck our government is doing?


14 posted on 07/26/2007 7:04:44 AM PDT by sageb1 (This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis

I had to look up “Vale” to decide if I was pissed off at you or not. LOL


15 posted on 07/26/2007 7:05:39 AM PDT by cripplecreek (Greed is NOT a conservative ideal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: indylindy
...prohibiting the use of federal funds for participation in working groups under the Security and Prosperity Partnership...

Ok, and this. What/who is meant by "working groups"?

16 posted on 07/26/2007 7:06:11 AM PDT by YellowRoseofTx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: YellowRoseofTx

In here somewhere, I think.

Select from the list below to view the “Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America” FOIA Documents

Section I - SPP Contact Lists and Organization Charts
http://www.judicialwatch.org/archive/2006/SPPFOIADocsSecI.pdf

Section II - SPP Regulatory Cooperation Symposium
http://www.judicialwatch.org/archive/2006/SPPFOIADocsSecII.pdf

Section III - SPP Meeting with Commerce Secretary Gutierrez, March 15, 2006.
http://www.judicialwatch.org/archive/2006/SPPFOIADocsSecIII.pdf

Section IV - Launch of the North American Competitiveness Council (NACC), May 26, 2006.
http://www.judicialwatch.org/archive/2006/SPPFOIADocsSecIV.pdf

Section V - Final Recommendations of the U.S. Section of the NACC.
http://www.judicialwatch.org/archive/2006/SPPFOIADocsSecV.pdf

Section VI - Launch of the NACC with SPP Ministers, June 15, 2006.
http://www.judicialwatch.org/archive/2006/SPPFOIADocsSecVI.pdf

Section VII - NACC Documents
http://www.judicialwatch.org/archive/2006/SPPFOIADocsSecVII.pdf

Section VIII - Prof. Robert A. Pastor’s Seminar on Building a North American Community, September 21, 2005.
http://www.judicialwatch.org/archive/2006/SPPFOIADocsSecVIII.pdf


17 posted on 07/26/2007 7:08:48 AM PDT by sageb1 (This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: xjcsa

Protectionist? This amendment has no effect whatsoever on tariffs. It is a stretch to characterize congressional oversight of highway construction protectionist.


18 posted on 07/26/2007 7:11:14 AM PDT by 3AngelaD (They screwed up their own countries so bad they had to leave, ad now they're here screwing up ours)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: YellowRoseofTx

The way I see it, it will strip the spp working groups of federal funding(can’t believe they had it in the first place since they worked behind our backs), and will give Congressional oversight over those groups. Take that how you wish, but there are a few no spp guys out there.

I do know Rice and Chertoff lead two of those working groups at this time. The spp page states that.

Why can’t people see what is going on?


19 posted on 07/26/2007 7:11:53 AM PDT by dforest (Duncan Hunter is the best hope we have on both fronts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: WestCoastGal

Excellent news! Thanks for the ping.


20 posted on 07/26/2007 7:13:48 AM PDT by Rushmore Rocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-128 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson