That may be the case, but I think it is likely that a number of Democrats will change their vote the second time around. Enough to let the veto stand? No idea. But it won’t be any 89-1 vote to override the veto.
While on the subject, for Bush to veto funding designed to simply enforce the law is extremely galling. It is a shame we can’t boot his sorry butt out if he does that. Again, I think as commander in chief his actions to thwart border security at the time he claims we are “at war” is clearly grounds for impeachment. He is blatantly refusing to uphold his oath of office to protect & defend this country.
I profoundly disagree with any sort of impeachment proceedings for President Bush.
It’s his job, he is doing it a manner he thinks is best for America, I disagree with how he is doing his job, but that is not a reason to impeach a President.
A Veto override is sufficient for me at least, my gut tells me it is only a political grandstanding opportunity anyway, the Dems are no more serious about securing the border then Jorge’ is, on this he is no more a Republican then Pelosi is.