To: caisson71
You're right of course but...Good luck making that argument around here. Too many self-righteous "I'm a Conservative and I won't support anyone else" people around here.
Better the Clinton S.S.R. than some candidate that doesn't meet their conservative "Litmus tests."
26 posted on
07/30/2007 11:52:13 AM PDT by
Sudetenland
(Never underestimate the ability of a Liberal to lie.)
To: Sudetenland
Better the Clinton S.S.R. than some candidate that doesn't meet their conservative "Litmus tests."
Limited government is the only test that counts and Republicans have failed that test. Why vote for a big government Republican when you can get the real deal with a Democrat.
.
31 posted on
07/30/2007 12:37:33 PM PDT by
radioman
To: Sudetenland
I believe the case can be made that the anger in 2004 against Republicans as it related to the ballot box was just wrong headed. A vote against Republicans in spite of the consequences we now experience with a Dimocrap Congress should be a wakeup call. I’m not saying that all Republicans should have been reelected but Republican alternatives would have been better.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson