Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Keep the tax addicts out of the White House
Townhall.com ^ | August 2, 2007 | Dopnald Lambro

Posted on 08/02/2007 4:18:06 AM PDT by Kaslin

WASHINGTON -- The good news last week came from the economy growing at a robust 3.4 percent annual rate in the second quarter -- disproving the gloom-and-doomers who predicted that the United States was heading into a recession. But bad news came from House Democratic leaders who were trying to raise corporate taxes on a lot of businesses that have contributed to that strong growth rate. It was a stark reminder that their addiction to taxes would sandbag the economy if they won back the White House in 2008.

The faster growth rate in the last three months, beating the consensus forecasts on Wall Street, proved that neither the decline in the housing market nor the rise in oil prices seem to have spilled over into the larger economy. Thus far, it seems that banks and other lenders -- who were making money hand over fist when the housing market was hot -- have been able to absorb the rising mortgage foreclosures. We still have not seen how much further the housing crunch has to go, but the evidence suggests that housing sales should begin turning around sometime in the last half of the year. So where was all this growth coming from?

No one encapsulated its component parts better than Edward Lazear, chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers: "I would say it can be summarized as follows," he said at a White House press briefing last week. "We got one point for consumption, we got one point from nonresidential construction and equipment and software, we got a point from exports, a point from government spending, and we lost half a point on housing. So a very balanced picture this time."

A closer look at the respective parts of the second quarter growth rate shows an economy -- despite its temporary housing illness -- running along at a healthy clip. Consumer spending grew at 1.3 percent. Exports grew by 6.4 percent. Nonresidential structure investment grew at 22.1 percent, federal spending was up by 6.7 percent and state and local government spending was up by 2.9 percent.

The numbers overall paint a brighter picture of the American economy than the negative picture we get on the nightly news shows. Yes, residential housing is in a slump, but nonresidential building is cruising right along at a hefty pace as businesses, plants, office buildings and the like continue their expansion. One of the most welcome economic forces spurring growth is the rise in U.S. exports and the narrowing trade deficit. The U.S. economy is being propelled in large part by a stronger global economy and, thanks to a number of free-trade agreements, we're making more and selling more in markets around the world. You don't hear very much about that on the nightly news, either.

"I can't think of any time in my business career where I've seen such a strong global economy. And we're really benefiting from that in terms of exports," Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson said last week. Increasingly, future growth in the U.S. economy will be due to a global economy that is breaking all records, and the U.S. is benefiting from it big time, both here and abroad.

But last week House Democrats announced that they were going to pay for a bloated, waste-ridden farm bill by raising taxes on "in-sourcing" companies operating in the United States, mostly nonunion businesses that employ Americans who pay the bills in this country and keep the U.S. economy humming. Foreign firms doing business in the U.S. employ more than 5.1 million Americans in high-paying jobs (like Toyota, Honda and BMW) that on average pay their workers $63,428 annually, 32 percent more than other U.S.-based jobs. That's why Paulson stressed at his briefing last week "how important (direct foreign investment) is to us, to our country. This is key. We have 5 million jobs in this country that are directly related to (foreign) investment. We've got another 5 million that are indirectly related to that."

Talk about killing the goose that lays the golden egg. The Democrats' tax hikes on these companies, and indirectly their workers, will endanger their livelihood and invite retaliation against U.S. investment abroad. In a blistering letter to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Democratic leader Steny Hoyer, Jay Timmons, senior vice president of policy and government relations for the National Association of Manufacturers, warned that higher tax rates would put these jobs "at risk by forcing many companies to rethink their plans to do business in the U.S.

"Foreign investment is particularly important to U.S. manufacturing. One out of every eight factory workers in the U.S. is employed by a foreign-owned company, and their jobs could be jeopardized by these discriminatory taxes," Timmons said.

Why raise taxes on a key part of the economy that employs millions of Americans in good paying jobs? That is the question that these workers should be asking the Democrats.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Editorial; Politics/Elections; US: District of Columbia
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 08/02/2007 4:18:08 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin; ancient_geezer; Taxman; pigdog; Principled; EternalVigilance; PhilWill; kevkrom; ...
Democratic leaders who were trying to raise corporate taxes on a lot of businesses that have contributed to that strong growth rate. It was a stark reminder that their addiction to taxes would sandbag the economy if they won back the White House in 2008.

It's time to nip this in the bud. We need to replace all federal income taxes with a national sales tax by passing The Fair Tax Act of 2007. More information can be found at Americans For fair Taxation. Fair Tax ping!
2 posted on 08/02/2007 4:30:12 AM PDT by Man50D (Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
That's why Paulson stressed at his briefing last week "how important (direct foreign investment) is to us, to our country. This is key. We have 5 million jobs in this country that are directly related to (foreign) investment. We've got another 5 million that are indirectly related to that."

The FairTax would make those figures look like chump change. We would be the planet's largest and favorite tax haven for business, the strongest money magnet in history.

3 posted on 08/02/2007 4:39:22 AM PDT by ovrtaxt (The FairTax and the North American Union are mutually exclusive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

Agree.


4 posted on 08/02/2007 4:40:10 AM PDT by Turret Gunner A20
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Would you happen to know who put in the tax law re: teachers.
Teachers that opt to have their pay spread out over 12 months are subject to Excise Tax. AND they have to fill out some form before they can start teaching next month.

Who is responsible for this little gem.


5 posted on 08/02/2007 5:02:32 AM PDT by marty60
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D
FairTax, YES, YES, YES
6 posted on 08/02/2007 5:35:25 AM PDT by GeorgefromGeorgia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

FairTax bump.

http://www.fairtax.org


7 posted on 08/02/2007 5:54:22 AM PDT by groanup (Limited government is the answer. What's the question?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

Thanks for the post. I’ll volunteer for Tommy Thompson. He supports the fairtax.


8 posted on 08/02/2007 7:11:57 AM PDT by PhilCollins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson