Posted on 08/02/2007 5:11:36 AM PDT by Brilliant
So, you think it actually makes sense to complain about low contributions for a candidate when the candidate isn't running for office? That is nonsense.
I like Fred, and think he is the best candidate. If he doesn't run, he won't get elected. If he can't figure out if he will run, then he is a Ross Perot look-alike.
He looks pretty wishy-washy at the moment. Only he can clear that up. I won't contribute to a non-running candidate any more that you would to my campaign. (I'm not running either, so it doesn't surprise me that my election fund is still empty.)
As soon as he declares, there’s a check coming from me...and I suspect, many others at the grass roots as well.
Dude, he's IN. Don't you get it? You are witnessing the future of political campaigning. 20 years from now you'll tell your grandkids that you were a part of this!
Candidate | Receipts | Spent | Debt | Polls | Cost per Point | |
mitt | $44,432,350 | $32,310,796 | $8,945,028 | 15 | $2,750,388.27 | |
rudy | $35,629,265 | $17,303,045 | 0 | 24 | $720,960.21 | |
fred | 3,462,355 | 625,743 | 0 | 23 | $27,206.22 | |
Can you post the link to where anyone in an official capacity, representing FRed Thompson, or his campaign, set a “goal” of 5 million?
BTW, How much did Hunter raise in his first month? Last reporting cycle?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.