Posted on 08/02/2007 11:16:02 AM PDT by jimluke01
Opposing the illegal use of the city’s public restrooms for anonymous homosexual liaisons has landed Mayor Jim Naugle in the news and on the wrong side of radical homosexual activists. Despite the unrelenting pressure, Mayor Naugle is holding the line. Concerned Women for America (CWA) applauds Mayor Naugle's firm stand for families.
(Excerpt) Read more at cwfa.org ...
It is incredible that there is even a question on this. I do not support ANY public sex ...
We have truly become Sodom
The following message brought to you by Code Pink:
Money For Public Sex Not War.
I thought a restroom was generally for doing #1 and/or #2. Just looking at the way they are designed, I think that is a fair assumption.
Use of the word, sodomites is considered hate speech by the fecal obsessionists. The marketers of deviance, aka Hollywood homos, have advanced civilization back to Roman times when the queers were allowed to sell, trade, and offer their young boys for the pleasure of others so inclined. We have NAMBLA today. Go to a homo pride parade if you want to see the disgusting display of this crowd of deviants; but be careful what you say, it might be a hate crime to oppose such disgusting public behavior.
No.
We are not ‘slouching towards Gommarah’, it’s more like an all out sprint.
My ex opposed private sex, too.
I think we should have a massive right-in campaign to get all the talk show hosts to call the liberals
REGRESSIVES
because of just th epoint you make. Have written a number of them myself.
Sex should be done in private, whether by gay or straight people. It’s not a spectator sport, for crying out loud!
Two guys? No.
Two (or more) girls? hell, yes!
The only appropriate thing to do is tell them to ‘get a room!’
TS
(*)making assumptions on the genders here
You guessed right, but I know more than just a few women whose exes weren’t interested in sex, either.
Assuming the lesbos look more like the ones on "The L Word" instead of like Rosie O'Donnell.
Well, maybe not in a downtown park. On a college campus commons, maybe...
Plus, it depends on what the girls look like.
MA State Police are no longer allowed to bust up Circle Jerks in the Rest Stops of MA highways. A judge ruled that public sex is part of Gay Culture. The men’s room on the 1st floor of my city hall also got five stars from a gay website.
Exactly! This is how gays try to ram their sexuality down everyones throat (for lack of a better term). Anyone who says they don`t support gay public sex is deemed a homophobe by the gays...This is what they do for parades, if they aren`t allowed to have a parade, then that town or city is deemed “anti-gay” or “homophobic”, but the point is there should not be ANY parade about ANY sexuality! What is the point? It`s ridiculous. Is there a “heterosexual day parade”? Sexuality is a private matter like taking a dump, the public does not need to hear about how someone does it. It`s just another example of liberals trying to control people, they just cannot accept that other people do not have the same beliefs as them.
The Holy Bible is quite clear about fag sex.
Leviticus 20:13
‘Nuff said. Do your God given duty.
That said in the various cities I've lived in there have been different approaches to this problem.
One is to allow the freaks of nature one place to do whatever they are going to do. Everybody knows where it is. Nobody is surprised.
The other is to roust the freaks where ever they gather. Soon they turn up in surprising places, much to the disgust of innocent bystanders.
I'll say that the first option is better.
The law doesn’t condone public sex for heterosexuals nor should it condone public sex for homosexuals and it has always been my understanding that the primary purpose of restrooms was to accommodate other human basic human needs.
Maybe some bouncer types should start patrolling these places with super-soaker water guns filled with ice cold water and cooling these flaming gays off
Public Gay Sex - Is It Acceptable to You?
public sex? no, get a room.
however, I have never seen this in public in my life.
I guess I live in a quiet city.
People sometimes have an epiphany. This occurs when a truth that has eluded them for years suddenly becomes obvious.
“Liberals” often have an unepiphany. This is when a truth that’s obvious to everyone who isn’t a complete idiot suddenly becomes untrue to the “liberal” mind. Anyone believing that public sex is okay (at least as long as it’s “gay” sex) has had an unepiphany.
“A judge ruled that public sex is part of Gay Culture.”
Better remember that, come election time.
Uh, no. It’s more like an Indy car race.
Were I to happen upon any two or more people engaged in such behavior, regardless of their gender, I’d find the closes garden hose and hose them off. If no hose is available, then a phone call to the authorities would be made and a complaint sworn out.
What were once vices are now a right? Sheesh!
HECK NO!
No, but then neither is public heterosexual sex.
Unfortunately you have too many mentally ill people around who think the hole you use for doing number 2 is intended for other purposes.
But remember, they are just like the rest of us... Cough Cough.
Unbelievable! Queers advocating public sex. Just goes to show that queers don’t procreate they recruit.
All these years I've been farting. Never knew there was an alternative. ;-)
Oh my gosh. Now I’ve heard everything. I think I liked it better when they all stayed in the closet!!!
NO homo sex is acceptable to me.
Freepmail wagglebee or little jeremiah to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda ping list.
Click FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search for a list of all related articles.
Add keywords homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list.
This is a trick question...right???
Um...WHAT?
I'll be sure to keep this in mind if I ever have to drive through the state. I'll keep a coffee can with me just in case.
My answer to that headline is:
Can we bring rotted fruit and veggies to where they are doing it and express our feelings in an age honored tradition?
Echhh . . . the Cleveland Steamer!
I don’t recall society ever deciding that public heterosexual sex was acceptable.
Echhh . . . the Cleveland Steamer!
We were frequently working the rest areas on the freeways due to the large numbers of homosexual prostitutes and johns that frequented these places. Families were afraid to use the rest areas because men would be accosted by the prostitutes, and children would see butt bandits in action in the bushes and in the restrooms. There would be used condoms scattered about as well as hypodermic needles and barrels.
We made many arrests. Some of the rest areas were listed on gay sites as a place to go for action.
Is this a trick question? /s
“My ex opposed private sex, too.”
Well, there’s always “gay sex” as an option ... .
(Couldn’t resist ;)
Notice to All Homosexuals:
If I happen to be in a public restroom and you pull out Mr. Johnson and propose some ‘getting acquainted” activity in my presence, prepare to have your world deteriorate at a high rate of speed.
In a nutshell, liberals have NO MORAL boundaries.
Those that do have MORAL BOUNDARIES are the ENEMY of ALL LIBERALS. You can NEVER be too low to be a liberal.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.