Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

to be vetoed.....disgusting
1 posted on 08/02/2007 11:53:53 AM PDT by Sub-Driver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Sub-Driver

Total political BS. Along with the recent tour extension came a minimum time home before the next deployment. It’s already policy.


2 posted on 08/02/2007 11:56:57 AM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

I always find it amusing when a bunch of drunken, dope-smoking hippy types try to school our generals on how to run strategic deployments. When will these idiot politicians learn that warcraft is best left to the war-fighters?


3 posted on 08/02/2007 11:58:32 AM PDT by vikingd00d
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver
O joy. Another balanced piece from Reuters. The digs come at the end. Don’t bother.
4 posted on 08/02/2007 12:00:17 PM PDT by ishabibble (ALL-AMERICAN INFIDEL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver
Rep. Ellen Tauscher, D-Calif., who repeatedly said that opposing the measure was "a vote for the status quo" in a war in its fifth year.

Why can't these moron Democrats add?

March 2003 to now -- the campaign is in the fourth year.

5 posted on 08/02/2007 12:03:02 PM PDT by A message
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver
"support for a troop withdrawal exceeds 60 percent"

Misleading poll question, as no one would say they NEVER want the troops home....

With 24/7 MSM coverage of negative stories about the war, mis-representations of the progress, mis-representations of the War's approval by Congress, "Bush was selected-Not Elected" rhetoric, etc., is it any wonder why after 5 years of hearing this B.S. Americans don't understand the Mission?

6 posted on 08/02/2007 12:05:58 PM PDT by traditional1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

Woops ... a little unintended candor?: “The vote was ... designed [intended] to complicate the Pentagon’s ability to rotate sufficient troops into the war zone.”

So it wasn’t for the soldiers and their families?


7 posted on 08/02/2007 12:08:15 PM PDT by fire and forget
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver
“This is about our families and our troops,” said Rep. Ellen Tauscher, D-Calif.

Face it, you could care less about the troops or their families — this is about trying to engineer an American defeat and embarrass the President to your political benefit.

8 posted on 08/02/2007 12:10:40 PM PDT by vetsvette (Bring Him Back)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

Home time for the troops isn’t necessarily a bad idea, but congress has NO BUSINESS sticking its nose into this kind of micromanagement. It’s for the President and the military to make these decisions, based on their best judgement.


9 posted on 08/02/2007 12:23:00 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

The Pentagon has a fixed number of personnel to fill billets in Iraq. If Congress mandates that the duration between deployments has to be longer, the only thing the Pentagon can do is to lengthen the tour lengths.


10 posted on 08/02/2007 12:23:54 PM PDT by mbynack (Retired USAF SMSgt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

If they did this during WWII, we’d all be speaking either German or Japanese. Some of our guys and women were overseas for four years or more. This is war folks. Remember, for the first three years of WWII, we were loosing. It took time to understand what we were up against. It’s no different in Iraq. We are just now understanding what is going on, what went wrong and what is working. Things will start changing pretty fast now.


11 posted on 08/02/2007 12:24:28 PM PDT by RC2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver
This legislation could put the lives of American Troops at risk -- senior members of teams having to leave early to be with families.

This might leave relatively inexperienced troops to deal with hazarardous situations (IEDs, etc).

12 posted on 08/02/2007 12:25:42 PM PDT by topher (Let us return to old-fashioned morality - morality that has stood the test of time...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

espo the ass puppet of the dnc


14 posted on 08/02/2007 12:33:34 PM PDT by italianquaker (When will pelosi ask congressman ellison to apologize for his 9-11 remarks?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver
If these hypocritical liars really wanted to help the troops they could immediately authorize and fund increased troop strength for the Army and Marine Corps to reduce time on deployments.
15 posted on 08/02/2007 12:33:49 PM PDT by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver
They don't care about the troops... the legislation is unconstitutional since it interferes with the responsibilities of the Commander In Chief. The Democrats are just trying to score cheap political points.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

16 posted on 08/02/2007 12:37:14 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

I don’t take seriously anything liberals say anymore. They all disgust me.


18 posted on 08/02/2007 1:12:31 PM PDT by jackv (DEMOCRATS HATE BUSH MORE THAN THEY LOVE THEIR COUNTRY!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver; All

Anybody know what standard minimum home time is?


21 posted on 08/02/2007 2:59:33 PM PDT by wastedyears (Freedom is the right of all sentient beings - Peter Cullen as Optimus Prime)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver
"In some ways we probably all underestimated the depth of the mistrust and how difficult it would be for these guys to come together on legislation," Gates said of Iraqi's squabbling political leaders.

LOLOL!!!! Some of us didn't Mr. Gates. Some of us said, and knew, from the get go there would be problems. Some of us weren't listened to. Others of us were too interested in purple fingers.

31 posted on 08/03/2007 11:21:34 AM PDT by billbears (Those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it. --Santayana)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson