Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 08/04/2007 6:00:19 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Kaslin

Most states are diverting funds from fuel taxes into social spending to buy votes. The result is pot holes, rusty bridges, clogged streets and a whole class of people who sit on their asses.
If they put a sign up on every bridge telling it’s rating..there would be a lot of voters demanding action.
Canada has had the same problem..Quebec bridge collaps, but nothing has changed.


2 posted on 08/04/2007 6:11:18 AM PDT by Oldexpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
Infrastructure does wear out. That's the normal trajectory of such things. The risk of dying because a bridge collapses while you are driving over it, is far less than being killed by lightening or shark bite, and only slightly more likely than encountering "Snakes on Planes."

Context, people, context. Get your comparative risk statistics on straight.

Congressman Billybob

Latest article, "It Bleeds, It Leads, It Deceives"

3 posted on 08/04/2007 6:11:31 AM PDT by Congressman Billybob (Please visit www.ArmorforCongress.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
Paradoxically, when I drive up and down Interstate 81 this summer every friggin' bridge seems to be under repair, along with half the road surface. Interstate 81 is nearly a de facto two lane road rather than a superhighway.

This situation screams for engineering innovation. We need a way to repair/replace bridges with less disruption. How about a civilian version of the portable Army bridge (Wolverine?). Something that could temporarily carry the load while the permanent span is repaired. It wouldn't work for the longest spans but we need creative solutions.

How about using old aircraft carriers? Use the flight decks as bridges. Two of them, one on each bank, with a temporary span between them to allow river traffic to pass. 800-1000 ft.each plus a 100+ ft span and you could bridge a significant gap.

4 posted on 08/04/2007 6:18:17 AM PDT by Dilbert56 (Harry Reid, D-Nev.: "We're going to pick up Senate seats as a result of this war.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

They just passed a massive highway and infrastructure spending program, including a bridge to nowhere. It’s not that they don’t have the money. We’re spending the money. It’s just that we are spending it on the wrong things.


5 posted on 08/04/2007 6:20:35 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

why would lib/dem legislatures appropriate funds for infastructure....

they are too busy spending tax payer funds for stem cell research...and all illegal welfare projects!!!!


9 posted on 08/04/2007 6:55:30 AM PDT by nyyankeefan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Isn’t building a new stadium far more important than maintaining roads, bridges, etc? Aren’t tax payers better off buying expensive facilities for “their” team than paying for road repair??? </ sacrasm>


10 posted on 08/04/2007 7:27:01 AM PDT by GBA (God Bless America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
Maybe during the 1990s the State of Minnesota should not of diverted over a billion dollars of State and Federal infrastructure dollars into an eco-freak boondoggle light rail project between down town Minneapolis and the Minneapolis airport. Maybe they should of been tending to their existing infastructure instead of wasting our money "legacy building".

The sadly ironic thing here is the terminal for this billion dollar waste og resources is about 1 mile from the bridge that collapsed.

11 posted on 08/04/2007 7:33:20 AM PDT by MNJohnnie ("Today’s task is three dimensional chess in the dark". General Rick Lynch in Baghdad)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

I suspect the Dims are blowing smoke on the bridge collapse as being caused by Bush because in reality the bridge was built in 1967 during the Johnson administration while Lyndon was skimping on domestic projects to ramp up his war in Vietnam. More guns less butter. I’m sure the bridge design was the least costly and therefore won the contract.


15 posted on 08/04/2007 8:11:03 AM PDT by ArtyFO (I love to smoke cigars when I adjust artillery fire at the moonbat loonery.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

The Feds need to let states pay for their own roads. Stop with the federal gas taxes and just let states take care of it. All this does is make states more dependent on the feds. These federal gas taxes are going into the general spending fund just like the Socialist Security taxes.


23 posted on 08/04/2007 9:48:20 AM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Dirty Little Secret:

Everyone clamors for money out of the pot.

They think, hey, why shouldn’t I get my share?

In fact, why not ask for as much as possible.

Of course, everyone else is doing the same thing, thus making the pot grow bigger and bigger.

You’re paying for everyone else’s grab.

Like Three-Card-Monte, it relies on human greed, and it works.


24 posted on 08/04/2007 9:49:46 AM PDT by P.O.E. (School's Out. Drive Safely)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson