Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

It was quite a mess that killed and injured innocent people.

Having the one who caused it pay for the repairs is an interesting concept.

1 posted on 08/04/2007 9:14:08 AM PDT by NCjim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: NCjim
I always like the concept of personal responsibility being actualized into the real world.
2 posted on 08/04/2007 9:16:46 AM PDT by bill1952 ("All that we do is done with an eye towards something else.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NCjim

Note that the driver who caused all this havoc didn’t have a license.


3 posted on 08/04/2007 9:16:55 AM PDT by SmoothTalker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NCjim

Make the judge who let him walk out of the courtroom chip in, too.


4 posted on 08/04/2007 9:20:41 AM PDT by P.O.E. (School's Out. Drive Safely)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NCjim

People should be liable for all the consequences of their errors, and they might buy insurance to cover it.

The remarkable thing here is that government is doing the right thing on behalf of the people it represents.


5 posted on 08/04/2007 9:21:13 AM PDT by Atlas Sneezed ("We do have tough gun laws in Massachusetts; I support them, I won't chip away at them" -Mitt Romney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NCjim

bump


7 posted on 08/04/2007 9:28:25 AM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NCjim

The man was driving without a legitimate license and no insurance...this happened while he was breaking the law. He killed people while in commission of a crime. Now, there are gun laws that state that if one kills someone in the commission of a crime they are to get the death penalty. Why is this any different?


9 posted on 08/04/2007 9:42:00 AM PDT by vetvetdoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NCjim
It’s taxpayers’ money, and there were damages out there, and we’re trying to recoup.”

So, if the state 'recoups' the cost of the damage from an individual, will the state send out reimbursement checks to Joe Taxpayer?

Hell no! This is simply a have-your-cake-and-eat-it-too scam.

Having the one who caused it pay for the repairs is an interesting concept

Having the one that caused it pay for it is insane. The already clogged courts will become completely unmanageable.

Additional layers of government will be required, and boy that's what we really need.

And some poor old grandma is going to lose the home that she raised her kids in because she caused a wreck that damaged public property.

Tax dollars build public facilities and tax dollars should fix them when they're broke.

And that's all I have to say about that.......

10 posted on 08/04/2007 9:46:04 AM PDT by cowboyway (My heroes have always been Cowboys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NCjim

22 year old Robert Klimczak had his license pulled following a crash in 2006. He failed to appear in court to answer to charges in that Wilson County accident.
And troopers say Klimzcak has also been involved in two other crashes, and has been cited for other moving violations including speeding.

http://tinyurl.com/224ab9


11 posted on 08/04/2007 9:49:00 AM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NCjim
In many state the person at fault has to pay. In Kalifornia they will even come after you in civil court if your insurance doesn’t pay.
12 posted on 08/04/2007 9:49:27 AM PDT by mad_as_he$$ (Beware of the seminar poster.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NCjim

In the midwest, the one that caused the accident always pays the repair bill. Surprised NC don’t do that. I can’t see tax money going to cover wreckage done by any individual. Know out a lamp post, or utility pole and ya get a bill.


14 posted on 08/04/2007 9:52:22 AM PDT by spunkets ("Freedom is about authority", Rudy Giuliani, gun grabber)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NCjim
“One of the scenarios may have been a blown tire. One of the scenarios might be a lane-change violation,”

A bad tire is more likely to give them a deep pocket than is an unlicensed driver with a string of violations.

16 posted on 08/04/2007 10:02:28 AM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NCjim
Having the one who caused it pay for the repairs is an interesting concept.

'Bout 15 years ago a friend of mine hit a patch of ice on I-75 just before the GA/TN line and hit a light pole. His car was totalled. Several months later he got a bill from the State of Tennessee for the light pole.....

17 posted on 08/04/2007 10:02:48 AM PDT by Thermalseeker (Made in China: Treat those three words like a warning label)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NCjim
His family said there was some type of mix-up concerning his driver’s license.

What on earth is a mix-up? I thought I read that his license was suspended. Sounds like his family's mind is mixed-up... after all, anyone in their family can do no wrong. /sarc

20 posted on 08/04/2007 10:15:55 AM PDT by ken in texas (come fold with us.... team #36120)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TheBattman

bump for later.


23 posted on 08/04/2007 11:00:08 AM PDT by TheBattman (I've got TWO QUESTIONS for you....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson