Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rich Suburbs Move to Democrats
RCP ^ | 8/7/2007 | Froma Harrop

Posted on 08/07/2007 6:09:55 AM PDT by oblomov

GREENWICH, Conn. -- You know you're in a different kind of town when the signs against drunk driving show a line drawn through a Martini glass to which the artist thoughtfully added a stirrer. Greenwich, Conn., is one such town.

Greenwich is home to billionaire hedge-fund managers, private-equity kings and corporate chieftains, as well as ordinary multi-multimillionaires. Interviewing people here requires leaving phone messages with au pairs and catching folks between board meetings.

You'd think that Greenwich would be solid Bush-loving turf -- what with all those tax cuts for the rich. It is not. The voters are roughly 40 percent Republican, 40 percent unaffiliated and only 20 percent Democratic, but Bush won the town by only a sliver in 2004, even though his father grew up here.

The political shift toward Democrats has been noted in wealthy suburbs from Seattle to Philadelphia. In 2006, an amazing 63 percent of voters making from $150,000 to $200,000 chose Democratic candidates. Even those making over $200,000 favored Democrats, albeit by a small margin.

Greenwich has also become an incubator for liberal candidates. Local businessman Ned Lamont became the bloggers' hero last year for nearly unseating Iraq-war cheerleader Joe Lieberman in a Senate race.

(Excerpt) Read more at realclearpolitics.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Front Page News; News/Current Events; US: Connecticut
KEYWORDS: bluezone; bourgeious; democrats; elitism; gop; greenwich; harrop; liberals; rats; snobbery; suburbia; suburbs; usefulidiots; wealth
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last
To: oblomov
I think a lot of this has to do with the preception that the Republican Party is the party of the religious right, and well-off sophisticates or pseudo-sophisticates do NOT want to be associated with the Rapture crowd.

Also, the wealthy tend to be pro-abortion, which is another strike against a Republican Party associated with religious conservatives.

There are a lot of people who have a very exaggerated fear of the religious right, overestimiating its power and exaggerating its goals. Some people actually believe the religious right wants to force non-believers to convert to Christianity, or to somehow make membership in a Christian church mandatory for all Americans.
41 posted on 08/07/2007 7:10:48 AM PDT by Steve_Seattle ("Above all, shake your bum at Burton.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Jeeves
Many benefit from government largess. Rush was saying that Warren Buffett picks up companies sold for estate taxes. Peter Lesis, Soros’ sidekick created Progressive Insurance to exploit the pool of drivers pushed into the pool.
42 posted on 08/07/2007 7:11:35 AM PDT by ClaireSolt (Have you have gotten mixed up in a mish-masher?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: oblomov

I think this just helps prove the theory that one doesn’t have to be a deep thinker to make a good living.


43 posted on 08/07/2007 7:12:52 AM PDT by metesky (Brought To You By Satriales Aerosol PorkChop Mist - The Finest New Jersey Has To Offer!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OrioleFan

What I find funny is blacks. Blacks who grow up in the ghetto and work their a$$es off to become wealthy STILL VOTE DEMOCRAT.


44 posted on 08/07/2007 7:19:00 AM PDT by RockinRight (Fred's Campaign: A hell of an opening, coast for a while, and then have a hell of a close.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight

Many successful Blacks credit LBJ’s Great Society Program for their success. The 2nd phase of the Civil Rights Movement is about economic justice. MLK spoke about ending poverty. Thus, when Republicans talk about cutting Govt spending and less Govt, many Blacks (esp the older Generation) feel that the GOP is trying to end economic enpowerment for them.


45 posted on 08/07/2007 7:31:29 AM PDT by Kuksool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj; Clintonfatigued

Funny, I thought sensible moderates ,like Jodi Rell, were going to turn affluent suburbs into being solid Red territory.


46 posted on 08/07/2007 7:33:42 AM PDT by Kuksool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Puppage

Hmmmm seems I have to plan my next trip there.


47 posted on 08/07/2007 7:34:39 AM PDT by Trueblackman (Terrorism and Liberalism never sleep and neither do I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kuksool

>The 2nd phase of the Civil Rights Movement is about economic justice.

So said the leaders of the Comintern when they occupied and took over the civil rights movement.


48 posted on 08/07/2007 7:37:25 AM PDT by oblomov
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Mom MD

“Affluent Suburbs out west are still firmly Republican.”

Were that it so. But it isn’t, at least in Oregon. The two affluent Portland suburban counties — Washington and Clackamas — voted to re-elect an astoundingly unpopular democratic Governor in 2006 by a 6.6 percent margin (Clackamas) and a 19 percent margin (Washington). Incumbent democartic Congressman David Wu (he of the Klingon flub up and consistently anti-Administration votes) won re-election in the prosperous 1st District with just under 82 percent of the vote.

Not encouraging, and I don’t think it’s gotten any better since then.


49 posted on 08/07/2007 7:39:14 AM PDT by Air Force Brat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

That statement is not class warfare, not class warfare at all. The reason we have problems in this country in the first place is because of this desire among people to bash the rich. Call it populism, and clearly, as per the statement I am responding to, this horrid influence pervades both parties.


50 posted on 08/07/2007 7:41:01 AM PDT by AzaleaCity5691
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: oblomov

heil hillary!


51 posted on 08/07/2007 7:45:27 AM PDT by ripley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steve_Seattle

The points you make are valid. Rush has said the country clubber type Republicans by in large don’t want to be associated with “the Religious Right”, “the Pro Life” and the “Pro Gun Rights” elements of the Republican Party. They will look down their noses at them, in large part because they fear disdain and ridicule by the intelligensia of society and the PC crowd if it comes to light that they are associated with them. Yes, could be an element of fear and misunderstanding towards them, as you say, but Rush thought it was more wanting to be on the side of what is popular in the media and among the more elite among us, so as not to be identified with the “neanderthals” that comprise that disdained group. Pity.


52 posted on 08/07/2007 7:51:44 AM PDT by txrangerette (Congressman Duncan Hunter for POTUS...check him out!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: sr4402
Why the rich would want to vote Dem is beyond me. The Dem's consistently want to raise the percentage of their taxes and make is harder on corporate America.

Because they are already rich, and the tax burden and regulation hurts their smaller, up-and-coming competition more than it hurts them. They've got lobbyists and congressmen to write loopholes into the code for themselves.

53 posted on 08/07/2007 7:57:13 AM PDT by LexBaird (Tyrannosaurus Lex, unapologetic carnivore)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: oblomov

The North East is Libeal. Film at eleven.


54 posted on 08/07/2007 7:57:43 AM PDT by Mad_Tom_Rackham (Elections have consequences.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LexBaird
They've got lobbyists and congressmen to write loopholes into the code for themselves.

Yeah, but the Kossacks want those loophole closed. And since they rule the Democratic party, the writing is on the wall.

55 posted on 08/07/2007 8:02:24 AM PDT by sr4402
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: sr4402
Yeah, but the Kossacks want those loophole closed. And since they rule the Democratic party, the writing is on the wall.

Ping me when the loopholes get closed by the Dems or the Reps.
56 posted on 08/07/2007 8:14:13 AM PDT by Eagle of Liberty (To Neo-Liberals like Pelosi, it's not about serving America, IT'S ALL ABOUT POWER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
I think your point is correct in that there are some rich that are detached from “business” in that they live off their wealth and are not active investors that risk their capital.
Wealth in this country is very fluid. Most of the top wealthy people in the USA did not inherit their wealth. People like Bill Gates, created their own wealth. There is a tendency for the “idle rich” to fritter away their wealth. These are NOT the majority of our wealthy.
People that have their capital at risk generally believe in free enterprise and have disdain for collectivism.
57 posted on 08/07/2007 8:18:51 AM PDT by GeorgefromGeorgia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Air Force Brat

hopefully that is only true on the east and left coasts. I’m in Denver, and while the city and Boulder (a northern suburb, university town) are firmly moonbat, the surrounding suburbs are VERY republican. Tancredo is my representative and wins overwhelmingly.


58 posted on 08/07/2007 8:20:23 AM PDT by Mom MD (The scorn of fools is music to the ears of the wise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight

Exactly as LBJ predicted except he used the N-word.


59 posted on 08/07/2007 8:21:33 AM PDT by OrioleFan (Republicans believe every day is July 4th, but DemocRATs believe every day is April 15th. - Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: txrangerette

I think some people who are intellectually insecure are very susceptible to going along with what the MSM defines as “respectable” thought, which means pro-abortion, pro-gay marriage, and anti-religious right. Also, many people’s views of the religious right are almost totally formed by their perceptions of televangelists, which are largely - and understandably - negative. (My apologies to the handful of televangelists who I think are straight shooters, even if I don’t necessarily agree with them, e.g., Charles Stanley, James Robison, and a few others.)


60 posted on 08/07/2007 8:23:59 AM PDT by Steve_Seattle ("Above all, shake your bum at Burton.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson