Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

So EnergyStar is pretty much a rip-off....
1 posted on 08/07/2007 9:22:39 AM PDT by .cnI redruM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: .cnI redruM
The legislation offers a new credit for plug-in hybrid vehicles of at least $4,000 per taxpayer

Guess they wanted to match the incentives given for all those unsold SUVs sitting on the lots.

Why would you offer a credit for something that is already selling out? Stupid!
2 posted on 08/07/2007 9:27:20 AM PDT by P-40 (Al Qaeda was working in Iraq. They were just undocumented.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: .cnI redruM
As he told C-Span, "I sincerely doubt that the American people will be willing to pay what this is really going to cost them."

Oh do tell, Dingell, you Communist...

Exactly how much is this idiocy really going to cost us?

3 posted on 08/07/2007 9:27:32 AM PDT by rabscuttle385 (Sic Semper Tyrannis * U.Va. Engineering '09 * Friends Don't Let Friends Vote Democrat * Fred in 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: .cnI redruM
and requires that all bulbs be 300 times more efficient than ordinary bulbs are today by 2020.

300 times? A common 100 watt incandescent bulb is 2.6% efficient. 300 times that would be 780% efficient, so you would get 7.8 times as much power in the visible spectrum compared to the total amount of energy you put in. If you get an efficient solar cell, the light would be able to power itself along with lighting the room.

4 posted on 08/07/2007 9:36:27 AM PDT by KarlInOhio (May the heirs of Charles Martel and Jan Sobieski rise up again to defend Europe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: .cnI redruM
Not at all. If Congress actually wants to increase energy efficiency there is a simple, elegant and cost-effective way to how to go about it. Just make energy more expensive. The easiest way to do that is a carbon tax. Such a tax would make fossil fuels which are contributing to man-made global warming more expensive, making low-carbon energy alternatives more relatively attractive.

Yup. That's what dems would do if they really wanted to limit energy consumption. Of course, they're not really interested in that; they're just interested in political posturing.

Typical.

I hope president Bush vetos this POS legislation.

6 posted on 08/07/2007 9:42:39 AM PDT by curiosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: .cnI redruM

With all the problems we face, these idiots are working to ban light bulbs.


11 posted on 08/07/2007 6:16:13 PM PDT by darkangel82 (Socialism is NOT an American value.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson