1 posted on
08/08/2007 10:45:56 AM PDT by
bnelson44
To: bnelson44
I suggest Turbin Durbin is morphing his stance prior to the election season. We’ll probably see more of this as the democrats try to convince everyone that they are a loyalist party (only now the the US instead of the terrorists talking points).
2 posted on
08/08/2007 10:49:28 AM PDT by
DoughtyOne
(Victory will never be achieved while defining Conservatism downward, and forsaking it's heritage.)
To: bnelson44
I wonder if Hell just froze over.
3 posted on
08/08/2007 10:51:53 AM PDT by
darkwing104
(Let's get dangerous)
To: bnelson44
Look close, there must be tears on his face somewhere...
4 posted on
08/08/2007 10:53:28 AM PDT by
Abathar
(Proudly catching hell for posting without reading the article since 2004)
To: bnelson44
The Dems need to prepare their flock for the fact that, Dem or GOP in 2008, the US troops will be in Iraq for a long time to come.
The last thing they want is for their own home-grown moonbats to be rioting in the streets like they did for LBJ should they win in ‘08.
7 posted on
08/08/2007 11:00:17 AM PDT by
TWohlford
To: bnelson44
Never mind Turbin Durbin. Regardless of any success in Iraq, he will continue to work for our defeat because he actually believes that is the best way to increase the Democratic Party’s power.
What should interest all is the empty suit that sat next to him. You Penn voters must be so proud of replacing Santorum with Cadaver Casey. What a duffus!
8 posted on
08/08/2007 11:02:25 AM PDT by
mort56
To: bnelson44
9 posted on
08/08/2007 11:05:02 AM PDT by
bnelson44
(http://www.appealforcourage.org)
To: bnelson44
Can’t satisfy these people. Now that they admit military progress is being made they say bring the troops home because of the lack of political progress. They complain that the Iraqi government is on a one month vacation but so is ours. Go figure.
10 posted on
08/08/2007 11:05:25 AM PDT by
jazusamo
(DefendOurMarines.com)
To: bnelson44
Faced with the undeniable fact of the Anbar awakening (well, almost undeniable), the Democrats have subtly shifted from Reid’s and Pelosi’s and Edwards’s line that the surge has failed to the more nuanced (and more accurate) line that the political process has failed. OK, so he's saying that the military solution is working and the political solution doesn't? Isn't this exactly 180 degrees out of synch with what they've been saying all along?
It must be hard to be a Democrat....
15 posted on
08/08/2007 11:25:47 AM PDT by
Kenton
(All vices in moderation. I don't want to overdo any but I don't want to skip any either.)
To: bnelson44
We were losing before we were winning?
17 posted on
08/08/2007 11:43:09 AM PDT by
showme_the_Glory
(ILLEGAL: prohibited by law. ALIEN: Owing political allegiance to another country or government)
To: bnelson44
Having large elements of the civilian population reject Al Qaida is hugh political progress. The lack of legislation is less important.
18 posted on
08/08/2007 11:55:25 AM PDT by
Dilbert56
(Harry Reid, D-Nev.: "We're going to pick up Senate seats as a result of this war.")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
