Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 08/08/2007 2:47:25 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: blam

Bunk...absolute tripe...


2 posted on 08/08/2007 2:49:35 PM PDT by in hoc signo vinces ("Houston, TX...a waiting quagmire for jihadis.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

Bovine scatology : )


3 posted on 08/08/2007 2:54:26 PM PDT by stephenjohnbanker ( Hunter/Thompson/Thompson/Hunter in 08! "Read my lips....No new RINO's" !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

Or could it be that monogamous societies have an even number of each sex, and polygamous societies have more females?


4 posted on 08/08/2007 2:55:12 PM PDT by Born to Conserve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

I always knew I was middle class. Two girls and three boys.


5 posted on 08/08/2007 2:57:14 PM PDT by colorcountry (Silence isn't always golden.....Sometimes it's just yellow!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

Not in my case but I did read something about this, years ago though. There were statistics on babies in distress and premies. The girls tended to be a little bit better survivor.


6 posted on 08/08/2007 2:57:18 PM PDT by CindyDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

yeah but girls are easier to deal with until puberty...


8 posted on 08/08/2007 3:20:39 PM PDT by MD_Willington_1976
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

Only boys for me and mine. I didn’t know she was rich. Hmmm


9 posted on 08/08/2007 3:31:20 PM PDT by showme_the_Glory (ILLEGAL: prohibited by law. ALIEN: Owing political allegiance to another country or government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

“The reason, simply put, is that women are tougher than men...”

Guess we should have sent shiploads of women to Iwo Jima and Normandy. The war would have ended immediately if not sooner.


12 posted on 08/08/2007 3:57:43 PM PDT by sergeantdave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam; patton; Gabz

what a bunch of bologna!

does not hold true for any family in our immediate family.


13 posted on 08/08/2007 4:44:13 PM PDT by leda (19yrs ... only 4,981yrs to go ;))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

Maybe so, my mother was poor always and had 9 girls and 3 boys, one boy died at 4 years of age, all the girls still live, with the eldest being 58. The 9 girls produced 12 children, the 2 surviving boys produced 5.


17 posted on 08/08/2007 10:09:44 PM PDT by tinamina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

What a waste of money and time.


18 posted on 08/08/2007 11:02:51 PM PDT by lolhelp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

its called “abortion”...and richy women can get them really easily and sneaky as well...


19 posted on 08/08/2007 11:07:58 PM PDT by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

What is wrong with the UK? A bunch of weirdos.


24 posted on 08/09/2007 6:58:42 AM PDT by Vision ("Blessed is the man who trusts in the Lord, whose confidence is in him." Jeremiah 17:7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

The only reason why I can think that this would happen is because wealthier women plan everything, even the day that they conceive their children. They know when they are ovulating and do it at the exact appointed time. That’s how they end up with more boys, the boy’s swim fast.


25 posted on 08/22/2007 5:22:47 PM PDT by rodeo-mamma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson