Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Planned army base, port in North heat up Arctic quest[Canada][Baffin Island]
CBC News ^

Posted on 08/09/2007 8:45:48 AM PDT by BGHater

Far up north on the tip of Baffin Island, an abandoned mine is set to play out a crucial military role in Canada's mission to assert its sovereignty in the Arctic.

CBC News has learned that the federal government is proposing to refurbish the former lead-and-zinc mining site into a deepwater docking facility, and also plans to build an army training centre in the North.

Military planning documents, obtained through an Access to Information request, outline plans for a $60-million conversion of the old Nanisivik Mine, which closed in 2002, into a Canadian naval station.

An army training centre is expected to be located in Resolute, Nunavut, one of Canada's most northern communities, sitting on the shores of the disputed Northwest Passage. The international strait remains free to all navigation, although Canada claims ownership over the much-coveted waterway and shipping route.

The prospect of the new, strategically placed military centre is exciting for Pierre Leblanc, the former commander of the Canadian Forces in the North.

"That facility, being a military facility sitting on the Northwest Passage, will also give a very clear political signal to the rest of the international community that we are serious about our sovereignty," Leblanc said.

For years, Leblanc said he campaigned to the government for a large sovereignty centre in Resolute to be operated by the army, navy, air force, and other government departments such as Customs, Immigration, and the RCMP. PM expected to announce Arctic base this week

While the new training centre doesn't live up to Leblanc's ambitious vision, he was pleased nonetheless. "It's important for Canada to be able to say this is ours, and if you want to go in here, these are the rules and standards by which you will abide," he said.

If the planned refurbishment of the mine goes ahead, it would deviate slightly from the Conservatives' promise during the last election campaign to build a new military deepwater port in Iqaluit.

The government of Nunavut pushed for the construction of that port as well as a small craft harbour in the territorial capital. The proposed port would have cost about $50 million.

Nanisivik, however, already has a deepwater dock and a fuel reservoir. It is also closer to the Northwest Passage.

Prime Minister Stephen Harper is expected to announce plans for the Nanisivik site later this week during his stopover in Resolute.


TOPICS: Canada; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: arctic; base; canada; military
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

1 posted on 08/09/2007 8:45:53 AM PDT by BGHater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Comment #2 Removed by Moderator

To: BGHater

Canadian sovreignty underwritten by Uncle Sugar!

MV


3 posted on 08/09/2007 8:50:47 AM PDT by madvlad ((Born in the south, raised around the globe and STILL republican))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater; GMMAC; Pikamax; Former Proud Canadian; Alberta's Child; headsonpikes; Ryle; ...

4 posted on 08/09/2007 8:56:36 AM PDT by fanfan ("We don't start fights my friends, but we finish them, and never leave until our work is done."PMSH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

They are planning toward a world with less ice.

No wonder they refuted Kyoto.


5 posted on 08/09/2007 8:58:39 AM PDT by Ender Wiggin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

Is this base going to eventually become the terminus for the Mexico through the US to Canada super highway?


6 posted on 08/09/2007 9:24:44 AM PDT by miele man (Continually voting against iodine deficient libs for 42 years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madvlad

madvlad, I hope you got your flak vest and helmet on! And you are so right. Rather than CONCENTRATING on the war on terror, canada sends a nominal force to Afghanistan and throws a two-week pity party every time one of them bites the dust. Not that I have no sympathy for troops dying - my son is in the US Army and has been over twice - but this is what they do. And they will hang black crepe all over canada when a few of the Van Doos buy it. Watch them.


7 posted on 08/09/2007 9:57:51 AM PDT by twonie (Keep your guns - and stockpile ammo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: miele man

No, Moscow is the terminus for that superhighway!

Ice Road Truckers beware!

MV


8 posted on 08/09/2007 10:03:07 AM PDT by madvlad ((Born in the south, raised around the globe and STILL republican))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: twonie
Rather than CONCENTRATING on the war on terror, canada sends a nominal force to Afghanistan and throws a two-week pity party every time one of them bites the dust. Not that I have no sympathy for troops dying - my son is in the US Army and has been over twice - but this is what they do. And they will hang black crepe all over canada when a few of the Van Doos buy it. Watch them.

You could not be more wrong. Canada has sent the same number of troops, relative its population to Afghanistan as the U.S. has. And the casualty rate is higher for Canadians that for the U.S., too. You are oblivious to the fact Cnada is pulling its own weight on this. You are sounding like a liberal who says the U.S. can't be in two places at once. The Arctic Archipelago is Canadian territory. Canada has a duty to defend it's territory as much as the U.S. has. On that basis, why does the U.S. have a military presence in Hawaii when troops are needed for Iraq. That was sarcasm, but you make me sick.

9 posted on 08/09/2007 10:26:18 AM PDT by doc30 (Democrats are to morals what an Etch-A-Sketch is to Art.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: twonie

I see, you’d rather let the Russians run rampant over the pole, and have a free-for-all in the NW passage when it is finally open for shipping.

That’s really security conscious of you.

As for the WOT, we’ve been in Ashcan from day one, and the only thing we see your guys doing is bombing OUR troops, with the occasional helo trip.

Get a grip on yourself, FRiend


10 posted on 08/09/2007 10:28:04 AM PDT by Don W (Yes, it's hyperbole, but I'm annoyed with the constant BASELESS sniping.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

Woo Hoo! That’s going to be a choice posting.


11 posted on 08/09/2007 10:36:30 AM PDT by centurion316 (Democrats - Supporting Al Qaida Worldwide)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: twonie

I just checked, and I’m showing 66 Canadian Armed Forces fatalities in Afghanistan. So how much cheaper is a Canadian (and an ally’s) soldier’s life than, say, an American’s? Discounted 20%? More?


12 posted on 08/09/2007 10:39:11 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: fanfan

This is good news, what with the Russians trying to claim the whole darn Arctic Ocean. In fact, I’d like to see a joint U.S./Can. effort to defend both sovereignty and international navigation in the region. We could figure something out - we did it for air defense over the Arctic.


13 posted on 08/09/2007 10:47:02 AM PDT by colorado tanker (I'm unmoderated - just ask Bill O'Reilly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: colorado tanker
This is good news, what with the Russians trying to claim the whole darn Arctic Ocean. In fact, I’d like to see a joint U.S./Can. effort to defend both sovereignty and international navigation in the region. We could figure something out - we did it for air defense over the Arctic.

Canada and the US are at odds over the NW passage and freedom of navigation through it so that is unlikely.
14 posted on 08/09/2007 11:07:36 AM PDT by Arkinsaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Arkinsaw
Canada and the US are at odds over the NW passage and freedom of navigation through it so that is unlikely.

I'm saying we ought to resolve that. Two allies ought to be able to figure that out, particularly where division only helps the Russians.

15 posted on 08/09/2007 11:12:04 AM PDT by colorado tanker (I'm unmoderated - just ask Bill O'Reilly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: twonie

Still enjoying our hospitality?


16 posted on 08/09/2007 11:16:02 AM PDT by kanawa (Don't go where you're looking, look where you're going.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: kanawa

That what y’all call it?


17 posted on 08/09/2007 12:14:01 PM PDT by twonie (Keep your guns - and stockpile ammo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: twonie

18 posted on 08/09/2007 12:27:55 PM PDT by kanawa (Don't go where you're looking, look where you're going.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
You should check the relative populations of the two nations. Let me help you. The USA has 10 times the population of Canada. 66 Canadian fatalities would equate to 660 US soldiers lost. Get it?

By the way, the US dollar is now selling at a discount relative to the Canadian dollar in my (border) city.

19 posted on 08/09/2007 2:13:59 PM PDT by Former Proud Canadian (How do I change my screen name after Harper's election?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: twonie

All I can really do is second what everyone else has said. I’ll point out as well that Kandahar is the MOST dangerous province of A-stan, and Canada is taking all the fire there. Please check your facts so you can at least show some intelligence if you feel you have to dump on your allies and neighbours.


20 posted on 08/09/2007 2:40:16 PM PDT by oakcon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson