Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lawsuit Of The Week: Adulterer Sues 1-800 FLOWERS ('Nother Junk Lawsuit Alert)
Debbie Schlussel.com ^ | 08/09/2007 | Debbie Schlussel

Posted on 08/09/2007 11:06:37 AM PDT by goldstategop

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last
To: picard
The thing that has always puzzled me about adultery is, Where do they find the time?

Oh that's easy. My ex would pick a fight, then storm off ;) He wasn't remarried for even two years, and the kids found his personal ad back up on Yahell!

Oh they'll find the time...

41 posted on 08/09/2007 1:47:02 PM PDT by TheSpottedOwl (If the families still ran Las Vegas, Harry Reid would be napping at the bottom of Hoover Dam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory

Adultery isn’t even an option for divorce. It’s unreconcilable differences these days. Either that or insanity.

I don’t know of any court that could give a care about adultery these days.


42 posted on 08/09/2007 1:49:41 PM PDT by TheSpottedOwl (If the families still ran Las Vegas, Harry Reid would be napping at the bottom of Hoover Dam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Vermont Lt
Just leave a note on the pillow when you leave for work, telling her how much you love her and appreciate her. Boy, it works better than a $100 dinner and a bottle of wine!

You're either sweetly sentimental or startlingly cheap. I'm not sure which . . .
:)

43 posted on 08/09/2007 1:54:22 PM PDT by Mrs_Stokke (Turn-of-the-century FReeper.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory
The way we learned it at USF (California, not that other one) was:

Offer, acceptance, consideration, (and, optionally for some) remedy.

Are you sure you aren't channeling Prosser?

44 posted on 08/09/2007 1:54:57 PM PDT by Tenniel2 (The heroes of Flight 93 diverted the wrong plane.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Larry Lucido

Ahah. Thanks, counselor!


45 posted on 08/09/2007 1:56:00 PM PDT by Tenniel2 (The heroes of Flight 93 diverted the wrong plane.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

In contract terms, there was a contract to supply flowers, which was fully performed. I suspect this “don’t send a receipt” business was either only a unilateral request, which was not accepted by the florist, or even if “agreed,” it was not part of the purchase contract but was a side deal unsupported by consideration, and thus was unenforceable.


46 posted on 08/09/2007 2:06:48 PM PDT by Burma Jones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mrs_Stokke

After 21 years, you use whatever ammo is dry at the time!


47 posted on 08/09/2007 2:15:27 PM PDT by Vermont Lt (I am not from Vermont. I lived there for four years and that was enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Mrs_Stokke; Vermont Lt; All
You’re either sweetly sentimental or startlingly cheap.
One Perfect Rose

A single flower he sent me, since we met.
All tenderly his messenger he chose;
Deep-hearted, pure, with scented dew still wet—
One perfect rose.

I knew the language of the floweret;
“My fragile leaves,” it said, “his heart enclose.”
Love long has taken for his amulet
One perfect rose.

Why is it no one ever sent me yet
One perfect limousine, do you suppose?
Ah no, it’s always just my luck to get
One perfect rose.

— Dorothy Parker.


48 posted on 08/09/2007 2:22:36 PM PDT by dighton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Tenniel2

I was using torts.

of course in contracts, the UCC only requires quantity be identified and all else can be show by extrinsic evidence.

Either way he should have more than enough to survive a motion for summary judgement.


49 posted on 08/09/2007 2:31:08 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Burma Jones

ohhhh so close.

You forget federal laws regarding dissemination of financial information.

also you are addressing this as if it is two contracts rather than the one.

Does the flower company have a policy of giving out financial purchase information to WHOEVER calls for it? Seems they are a bit TOO free with the financial information.

Even if they win this case, they will lose in the court of public opinion IF (said IF) the story gets legs.


50 posted on 08/09/2007 2:36:22 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

pay with cash stupid

if you want to cheat don’t bitch about a divorce


51 posted on 08/09/2007 4:38:05 PM PDT by Taffini (Mr. Pippin and Mr. Waffles do not approve)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nathan Zachary
Just a few hours before he died, my husband bought me a car. As I could not get out of the lease on my husband's car, the company from whom he had bought the car for me agreed to take it back. For the next five years I kept getting mail from Ford thanking me for purchasing one of their vehicles - very painful as it reminded me of that awful day.

No doubt the folks selling the cars and those dealing with PR are worlds apart.

Perhaps the same is true with 1-800-FLOWERS.

52 posted on 08/09/2007 4:52:00 PM PDT by Churchillspirit (We are all foot soldiers in this War On Terror.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

He’s never heard of “cash and carry”? Most florists will let you do this. No paper trail.

I’d be willing to bet it was a woman at 1-800-flowers that sent the note to his wife and I’ll bet she did it intentionally.


53 posted on 08/09/2007 5:11:43 PM PDT by Tall_Texan (Global warming? Hell, in Texas, we just call that "summer".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mrs_Stokke

“You’re either sweetly sentimental or startlingly cheap. I’m not sure which . . .”

Consider the possibility of both? I took notes on his post, and I’m going to file the serial numbers off that idea, and claim it as my own!


54 posted on 08/09/2007 5:32:05 PM PDT by Old Student (We have a name for the people who think indiscriminate killing is fine. They're called "The Bad Guys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

Cheaters suck!
Plaster his stoopid mug in every newscast across the country!


55 posted on 08/09/2007 6:27:23 PM PDT by RandallFlagg (Satisfaction was my sin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


56 posted on 08/10/2007 12:16:41 AM PDT by RandallFlagg (Satisfaction was my sin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: TheSpottedOwl
Egad!

I was once hit on by a beautiful-knock out married coworker on a business trip. I was sitting in her hotel room while she called her husband as she did every night to say good-night.

When she finished the call, she jumped on the bed in a playful way and rolled over and looked at me.

Oddly enough, all I could see was her husband and her kids. (and thinking about what a nuclear disaster it would be if I got her pregnant)

What if I ever had to meet her husband and kids at a cookout or presentation? Long story short, Kenny Rogers got the best of me and I left. She was very confused at the time but a few weeks later we both agreed that what happened was the best of all possible outcomes.

It's a shame though, it would have been massively wonderful, I mean one for the record books, oh well.

Ahh, the travails of being a responsible adult...

57 posted on 08/10/2007 6:58:44 AM PDT by picard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Larry Lucido
As a non-attorney, I'll ask the following question.

In many states adultery is illegal.

Therefore, wasn't the client asking them to participate in an illegal act?

58 posted on 08/10/2007 9:36:41 AM PDT by nevergore ("It could be that the purpose of my life is simply to serve as a warning to others.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: TheSpottedOwl
I don’t know of any court that could give a care about adultery these days.

They do if the behavior is serial and the kids have been exposed to "mommy's friends". And thank God for me that they did. It goes to stability of the prospective homes.

59 posted on 08/10/2007 11:19:40 AM PDT by Minn (Here is a realistic picture of the prophet: ----> ([: {()
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: picard

You did the right thing. I’m sure she found someone else with less scruples to fool around with.

My bf went through the same crap that I did, except that his now ex is a drug addict.

In the end, being a responsible adult is the right way to go. Good on you :)


60 posted on 08/10/2007 3:03:17 PM PDT by TheSpottedOwl (If the families still ran Las Vegas, Harry Reid would be napping at the bottom of Hoover Dam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson