1 posted on
08/09/2007 1:46:03 PM PDT by
blam
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
To: blam
Puerile, Pootie-poot. Very puerile.
2 posted on
08/09/2007 1:46:56 PM PDT by
mewzilla
(Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
To: blam
3 posted on
08/09/2007 1:48:37 PM PDT by
blam
(Secure the border and enforce the law)
To: blam
I don’t think this is very smart of them.
4 posted on
08/09/2007 1:48:39 PM PDT by
Bahbah
To: blam
They still fly this old thing? you can see them coming for miles.
5 posted on
08/09/2007 1:49:21 PM PDT by
Pistolshot
(Every woman, who can, should learn to shoot, and carry a gun.)
To: blam
The Pentagon was "unnerved"? More likely the Pentagon was annoyed by these clownish aviators from a dying land.
6 posted on
08/09/2007 1:50:50 PM PDT by
wideawake
(Why is it that so many self-proclaimed "Constitutionalists" know so little about the Constitution?)
To: blam
“is likely to have unnerved the Pentagon and caused further perplexity at the State Department over the Kremlin’s mercurial course.”
Meanwhile, anyone with a smidgen of common sense could have seen this coming a decade ago.
To: blam
...... and caused further perplexity at the State Department over the Kremlin's mercurial course. When is Foggy Bottom not perplexed? Their heads are buried too deep in the sands of Arabia to see squat.
8 posted on
08/09/2007 1:52:59 PM PDT by
Mr. Mojo
(There are four types of homicide: felonious, accidental, justifiable, and praiseworthy)
To: blam
OK so Russia (USSR) can afford gas for it’s plane. Reviving Cold War escapades seems childish and some what dangerous.
Wonder if they’re playing patty cake at the ICBM sites?
10 posted on
08/09/2007 1:53:09 PM PDT by
wolfcreek
(2 bad Tyranny, Treachery and Treason never take a vacation...)
To: blam
they may be having more troubles at home then we know or are told.
11 posted on
08/09/2007 1:53:19 PM PDT by
camas
To: blam
It doesnt matter how much of a relic this plane is...the planes fire nuke tipped cruise missiles from stand off range, and that’s a threat.
12 posted on
08/09/2007 1:56:32 PM PDT by
in hoc signo vinces
("Houston, TX...a waiting quagmire for jihadis.")
To: blam
13 posted on
08/09/2007 1:58:19 PM PDT by
TChris
(The Republican Party is merely the Democrat Party's "away" jersey - Vox Day)
To: blam
"Yesterday we revived this tradition."
Can their tradition of shooting down passenger airliners be far behind?
16 posted on
08/09/2007 2:03:33 PM PDT by
skeeter
To: blam
If we splash just one of these bombers, this sort of thing will stop right quick. Maybe there can be some sort of accident...
18 posted on
08/09/2007 2:04:36 PM PDT by
gridlock
(You cannot coexist with somebody who wants you dead.)
To: blam
Maybe a stealth bomber should visit Leningrad. At night. In rain.
24 posted on
08/09/2007 2:09:56 PM PDT by
doodad
To: blam
I spent 6 months at Andersen AFB during the Viet Nam era, 1972. I just checked the Goggle map and the B-1s there look fine and ready to go! The naval facilities included Polaris Missile Sub support in that era and I suspect that today the new Ballistic Missile subs port there as well.
They might want to reignite the Cold war along with their US sympathizers, AKA the Demoncommies, but no luck!
28 posted on
08/09/2007 2:12:37 PM PDT by
Young Werther
( and Julius Caesar said, "quae cum ita sunt." (or since these things are so!))
To: blam
"It was always the tradition of our long-range aviation to fly far into the ocean, to meet (US) aircraft carriers and greet (US) pilots visually,"Just a reminder, you are in a LARGE, metal, turboprop plane, visually greeting fighter pilots....had the Americans not needed the humor, the only visual you would have had would have been the vapor trail of the missile incoming to make your turboprop a very large....kit.
29 posted on
08/09/2007 2:13:43 PM PDT by
NorCoGOP
(Visit my blog! http://shawnsblogroom.blogspot.com)
To: blam
“is likely to have unnerved the Pentagon and caused further perplexity at the State Department over the Kremlin’s mercurial course.”
Your perplexed State Dept...half of whom are vested in the Saudi retirement fund.
To: blam
Why don't we launch World War II fighters to intercept and not waste jet fuel.
Time to start building Corsairs and Mustangs as intercept planes for these beasts.
That way our jets do not have to fly at almost stall speeds to stay with the Tu-95...
31 posted on
08/09/2007 2:15:55 PM PDT by
topher
(Let us return to old-fashioned morality - morality that has stood the test of time...)
To: blam
Putin is a moron.
At a time in history when the biggest threat facing both West and East is islamic fundamentalism, Pooty-Poot wants to dig into the past and revive the cold war.
Real smart, Vlad. Real smart.
To: blam
Response to deter this type of activity:P
1) develop a midair, stand off, focused electromagnetic bomb missile.
2) next encounter, warn at 12 miles
3) intercept and fire the missile and detonate
4) EMP missile destroys thousands perhaps hundreds of thousands of dollars of equipment.
5) maintaining aircraft for these flyovers becomes very expensive.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
