Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sean Hannity shows you the secret CIA documents that reveal the truth about Joe and Valerie Wilson.
Fox News TV

Posted on 08/12/2007 6:12:22 PM PDT by navysealdad

Sean Hannity shows you the secret CIA documents that reveal the truth about Joe and Valerie Wilso. Sunday, August 12 at 9 p.m. ET


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cialeak; corruption; democrats; hannity; niger; perjury; plame; plamegate; treason; wilson; yellowcake
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-105 next last
To: uncle fenders

Peter Fitzgerald...SILENT on Valerie Plame’s lies!


41 posted on 08/12/2007 7:06:57 PM PDT by spyone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: navysealdad

The Wilsons should be be charged with SEDITION. Corrupting a government agency against a sitting President


42 posted on 08/12/2007 7:09:10 PM PDT by Wil H (So just what IS the Globe's optimum temperature?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: navysealdad

Wilson claimed every chance he got that his wife did not send him or get him sent. When this first broke he was on C-SPAM claiming he did not know who asked him to go and he would not recognize them if he met them on the street.

I personally believe that it was not his wife’s original idea, rather that somebody who was playing protect Saddam’s backside politics whispered into his ear and he pillow talked his woman into getting in writing CIA travel cover.

It was a protect Saddam racket from the beginning, among other things. I think the moles are still there and they await their orders. Nothing less than an all out conspiracy to save Saddam and protect some very deep pockets all around this globe. IMHO


43 posted on 08/12/2007 7:09:12 PM PDT by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: uncle fenders
In effect what this means is the democrats and the media ran a con job to frame the Republicans and the White House. Allowing them to make false charges and devious campaign commmercials for two years.

Nothing new.

44 posted on 08/12/2007 7:11:44 PM PDT by JohnLongIsland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee

I’ve seen read bits and pieces of plame’s endorsment of her husband from Byron York.....any links to the actual memo??


45 posted on 08/12/2007 7:15:10 PM PDT by God luvs America (When the silent majority speaks the earth trembles!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: TWohlford

Glad this will be aired on FOX News. They have the largest audience so this should get around quickly.


46 posted on 08/12/2007 7:21:49 PM PDT by 1035rep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: navysealdad
That doc may need this to put it into prospective. They certainly look like snakes to me.
47 posted on 08/12/2007 7:22:54 PM PDT by ThunderBeast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: navysealdad

here’s the link to liar joe’s NYSlimes article

http://www.nytimes.com/2003/07/06/opinion/06WILS.html?ex=1372824000&en=6c6aeb1ce960dec0&ei=5007

here’s liar joe’s lie from the article:

“The next day, I reminded a friend at the State Department of my trip and suggested that if the president had been referring to Niger, then his conclusion was not borne out by the facts as I understood them. He replied that perhaps the president was speaking about one of the other three African countries that produce uranium: Gabon, South Africa or Namibia. At the time, I accepted the explanation. I didn’t know that in December, a month before the president’s address, the State Department had published a fact sheet that mentioned the Niger case.”


48 posted on 08/12/2007 7:29:48 PM PDT by God luvs America (When the silent majority speaks the earth trembles!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rudder; sirchtruth

Don’t be so sure. The Washington Post is beyond fed up with these two. WP ran a serious article a couple of years back, casting a lot of doubt on Plame’s claim that she never recommended her husband for such a mission. More recently, it ran an editorial that pretty explicitly said “we’re sick of hearing about these two and it pains us that news events force us to mention them once again.”


49 posted on 08/12/2007 7:30:39 PM PDT by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: GovernmentShrinker

Maybe they are saying that so that they won’t take criticism for not actually reporting the truth.


50 posted on 08/12/2007 7:32:28 PM PDT by MarkeyD (Just another country bumpkin looking forward to Fred!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: boop

Valerie Wilson was under oath when she told those lies.


51 posted on 08/12/2007 7:32:44 PM PDT by 1035rep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: golfisnr1

Let me tell you what happened to me today. I had to get up with my dog about 2:30 or so. I went back to bed and when it was a little before 11, I turned the radio on for Rush. I just could not understand why he was not on until it dawned on me what day it really was! Very confusing day.


52 posted on 08/12/2007 7:34:53 PM PDT by MamaB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ThunderBeast
This may help also. Or a more recent by Novak.
53 posted on 08/12/2007 7:36:50 PM PDT by ThunderBeast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: ThunderBeast
SWORN TESTIMONY

In her testimony before the House, Mrs. Wilson said flatly, “I did not recommend him. I did not suggest him.” She told the House committee that a 2004 Senate report, which concluded that she had indeed suggested her husband for the trip, was simply wrong. In particular, Mrs. Wilson pointed to a February 12, 2002, memo she had written, which the Senate said showed that she had suggested her husband for the trip, and claimed that the Senate had taken the memo “out of context” to “make it seem as though I had suggested or recommended him.”

I hope this witch gets nailed for perjury. 

54 posted on 08/12/2007 7:41:16 PM PDT by 1035rep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: 1035rep

You know nothing will come of it.


55 posted on 08/12/2007 7:47:51 PM PDT by MarkeyD (Just another country bumpkin looking forward to Fred!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: MarkeyD

There’s more to it than that. Plame-Wilson have gotten themselves crossed off the lists of a lot of Democrat movers and shakers. Like the law firm that dumped them within a couple of weeks of announcing it would be representing them. These two are not darlings of the Democrat machine. They were essentially run out of Washington.

The CIA is not happy when any of its operatives at any level try to turn themselves into media celebrities, and I’m sure the movers and shakers at the CIA have ways of putting out the word that so-and-so is persona non grata. And Wilson’s habit of running his mouth injudiciously (including, according to several sources, telling people at cocktail parties that his wife was a CIA agent, long before such info ever appeared in the media) has gotten him a label as a trouble-maker. Gotta love this quote from Joe in a NY Times article back in March, when they were packing up to leave Washington: “The problem is that the agency [CIA] is living in an Alice-in-Wonderland world where they don’t want to admit that she worked for them before 2002,” Mr. Wilson said as he paused in packing on Wednesday. “We just might have to sue them, and they will be reminded this is not the Soviet Union.” I can just imagine how that went over at the CIA.

Frankly, much of the MSM needs fodder to put on shows of non-partisanship. I think Plame-Wilson have been identified as ripe for the picking.


56 posted on 08/12/2007 7:48:28 PM PDT by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: MarkeyD

We will just wait and see.


57 posted on 08/12/2007 7:50:07 PM PDT by 1035rep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: God luvs America
Maybe on Hannity’s or FOX News’ website. It should show up soon because it appeared on the screen on Hannity’s show.
58 posted on 08/12/2007 7:50:24 PM PDT by Brad from Tennessee ("A politician can't give you anything he hasn't first stolen from you.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: GovernmentShrinker; MarkeyD

Meant to include the link to that article:
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/08/washington/08valerie.html?ei=5070&en=64dbe200d4c6f073&ex=1187064000&adxnnl=1&adxnnlx=1186972740-AobBijYkGrL2Y6uWsp8lMA


59 posted on 08/12/2007 7:51:26 PM PDT by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: GovernmentShrinker

Even if it means revealing that Bush’s 17 words were not, in fact, lies?


60 posted on 08/12/2007 7:52:22 PM PDT by MarkeyD (Just another country bumpkin looking forward to Fred!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-105 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson