Posted on 08/12/2007 6:12:22 PM PDT by navysealdad
Wolfie, you seriously need to get a TV. Before Christmas!!! :D
Everybody who matters already knows that. The people who don’t know are going to vote Democrat in the next Presidential election anyway, no matter what they learn about anybody.
Plame-Wilson did not toe the Dem party line, and embarrassed the party machine in the process. They also embarrassed the CIA, which is a bipartisan machine of its own. An example must be made of them (and to a large extent already has been, given that they’re now living in exile in Santa Fe).
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/01/20030128-19.html
By the way, President Bush said many other things about Saddam Hussein and WMDs in the 2003 State of the Union address. The press acted as though the above quote was the one and only critical claim, when it was not. They acted as though it was wrong, when it clearly was not. They acted as though this justified our going to war, when Congress had authorized the use of force two months earlier. So the MSM was wrong in many ways.
I have a BIG TV. I just don't get broadcast TV and won't get cable. There are so many great movies to watch I don't waste my time on that garbage the networks push.
This is indeed SHOCKING news.
Sean Hannity can READ!!!
bump.
Cuz the democrats are running Congress?
Just a hunch.
yeah,
right!
you wanna bet the pubbies will have the balls
to stand up and get her charged for perjury?
“Theres more to it than that. Plame-Wilson have gotten themselves crossed off the lists of a lot of Democrat movers and shakers. Like the law firm that dumped them within a couple of weeks of announcing it would be representing them. These two are not darlings of the Democrat machine. They were essentially run out of Washington.”
As will all of the anti-war Dems. You’ll note a steady drumbeat of “we can’t leave anytime soon” stories in the MSM, and those are so close in content and time of release that they must be coordinated.
The last things that the Dems want is another 1968 convention, or to be elected as the next Nixon.
Ha! Not with Hannity! One thing I'll give that guy is that he is a dog on a bone with stuff like this. Thank God the nation no longer relies on the socialist Democrat "mainstream" newsrooms for news. These revelations will be all over the place.
Can you tell us what Committee/subcommittee she testified before, and when? I ‘d like to get a copy.
The same for Joe Wilson’s testimonies.
Thanks
Segment replay startin right now
Bump!
Dont be so sure. The Washington Post is beyond fed up with these two. WP ran a serious article a couple of years back, casting a lot of doubt on Plames claim that she never recommended her husband for such a mission. More recently, it ran an editorial that pretty explicitly said were sick of hearing about these two and it pains us that news events force us to mention them once again.
That’s probably because any benefit that Democrats were hoping to derive from Plamegate and corresponding Schumer-Comey-Fitzgerald’s multi-year witchhunt that, with the great help of stacked DC jury, finally culminated in “Scooter” I. Lewis Libby’s conviction, runs right back into the unethical if not criminal and traitorous behavior by both Valerie Plame and Joseph Wilson and their inconsistent and convoluted lies to different government agencies and various Congressional committees as well as the press.
One of the interesting exchanges shown in Hannity’s piece was during Joe Wilson’s testimony in Congress, where he admitted to leaking information about his trip to Niger - that he himself “believed to be” classified - to Walter Pincus of the aforementioned Washington Post...
In other words, instead of assets as innocent non-partisan civil servants Wilsons turned out to be a great liability that came across (rightfully) as opportunistic greedy partisan hacks with clear ties to Democrats and the media.
No wonder Dems and the media don’t want any part of Wilsons and really want us to forget about them, except maybe if they can remake them back in the movie coming to the theaters near you next elections year.
ok, whew. I don’t either. Trash, not worth the effort it takes to turn the thing on.
Well that’s hardly a new document. I have a copy of it in the book I bought on Libby’s trial.
That it is getting some press is good news.
Note that he is careful to say that there was no CONTRACT reached to buy the yellow cake.
Now is there a way for them to buy the yellow cake without a contract? Perhaps through third parties or other governments?
She sure is ignorant of her fellow co-workers names.
” HOW IT ALL STARTED
Sen. Bonds additional views also cast doubt on Mrs. Wilsons story of how her husbands name came up in CIA discussions of the Niger uranium matter. In her testimony to the House, she described an impromptu meeting at the CIA after another agency officer received a phone call from the vice presidents office inquiring about Niger and uranium. A young junior officer who worked for me came to me very concerned, very upset, Wilson testified. She had just received a telephone call on her desk from someone, I dont know who, in the Office of the Vice President, asking about this report of this alleged sale of yellowcake uranium from Niger to Iraq. It was not clear from Mrs. Wilsons testimony why the junior officer was upset, but just at that moment, she continued, someone passed by, another officer heard this. He knew that Joe had already my husband had already gone on some CIA missions previously to deal with other nuclear matters. And he suggested, Well, why dont we send Joe? That, Mrs. Wilson testified, was the beginning of her husbands mission to Africa. “
**I hope this witch gets nailed for perjury. **
But that would mean that Bush and the WhiteHouse was right about this case.
The lamsstream media, ABCNNBCBS doesn’t want that to happen, now, do they?
LOL!
Plame lies ~~ PING !
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.