Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mr. Silverback
This anti-natalism is not limited to liberals. A few years ago, at a dinner I attended, a conservative Christian advocated sterilizing poor women as a solution to welfare dependency. And today, leading immigration-reform groups have links to zero-population growth advocates.

NumbersUSA is one of those anti-human groups who only oppose immigration (NOT illegal immigration -- all immigration) because it's part of their radical liberal zero population growth philosophy.

One of the leaders of this anti-human movement is John Tanton, a Planned Parenthood and anti-immigration leader who is a contributor to the Tom Tancredo campaign.

Tancredo took a lot of flack for accepting Tanton's support, but he apparently sees nothing wrong with it. It's very disappointing when conservatives don't see what kind of scum these people are who are trying to jump into bed with them to further their radical agenda.

4 posted on 08/13/2007 7:20:43 PM PDT by JohnnyZ (Romney : "not really trying to define what is technically amnesty. I'll let the lawyers decide.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: JohnnyZ

Personally, I don’t see anything wrong with a zero population growth philosophy. The real issue is how you implement it. Depriving liberty should never be an option. On the other hand, taking away freebies, supplements and incentives sounds good to me. Regulating immigration so that it acts as a positive force for our nation was the norm until the 60’s. Then it was morphed into a policy of ‘anything goes’ regardless of it’s effect on the nation.


7 posted on 08/13/2007 7:33:00 PM PDT by nitzy (globalism and limited government cannot co-exist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson