Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JohnnyZ

Personally, I don’t see anything wrong with a zero population growth philosophy. The real issue is how you implement it. Depriving liberty should never be an option. On the other hand, taking away freebies, supplements and incentives sounds good to me. Regulating immigration so that it acts as a positive force for our nation was the norm until the 60’s. Then it was morphed into a policy of ‘anything goes’ regardless of it’s effect on the nation.


7 posted on 08/13/2007 7:33:00 PM PDT by nitzy (globalism and limited government cannot co-exist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: nitzy
Personally, I don’t see anything wrong with a zero population growth philosophy.

I believe it.

There are a lot of anti-human people in this world, and many of them think they're conservatives.

8 posted on 08/13/2007 7:34:59 PM PDT by JohnnyZ (Romney : "not really trying to define what is technically amnesty. I'll let the lawyers decide.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: nitzy
Personally, I don’t see anything wrong with a zero population growth philosophy.

For one thing, you should take a close look at the people and organizations who support such philosophy, and then you'll get a clue.

Also, any philosophy that takes people as a neutral or liability rather than an asset is completely at odds with reality, including a mountain of empirical data. In a sense, probalems get solved when we have more people around to solve them.

10 posted on 08/13/2007 7:38:30 PM PDT by Mr. Silverback (Backing Tribe al-Ameriki even if the Congress won't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: nitzy
>Personally, I don’t see anything wrong with a zero population growth philosophy.

In the US, we are already slightly below a zero population growth rate. In most of the developed world, the birth rates are much lower and the "rate of growth" is highly negative.

I guess we've been inundated with "population explosion" propaganda for so long we are unable to recognize it when the explosion becomes an implosion.

I was reading an SF novel recently where only one woman in 10 gave birth, and pregnant women were hunted through the streets by murderous mobs, yet somehow the "population explosion" was continuing. Not very scientific, I fear.

13 posted on 08/13/2007 8:07:58 PM PDT by Sherman Logan (It's not the heat, it's the stupidity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: nitzy
taking away freebies, supplements and incentives sounds good to me.

Before social security, people had incentive to have and raise productive members of society: it was their retirement plan. These days parents get little back for raising their children to succeed. If the government paid a small commission to parents for taxes paid by their children, and took away a bit of social security if their children ended up a burden in jail, suddenly you'd see parents being more careful about who they have children with and how much effort they put into their upbringing.

18 posted on 08/13/2007 8:40:59 PM PDT by Reeses (Leftism is powered by the evil force of envy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: nitzy

The irony is, we’d have to have an upswing in the birthrate for Americans (born in the USA) to reach mere replacement: ZPG. The entire increase in US population is due to immigrants and the first-generation children of immigrants.

And I love the well-raised children of immigrants.

This is an indictment of Americans, with our 0 or 1 or 2 child families. No children, no future.


26 posted on 08/14/2007 5:11:31 AM PDT by Mrs. Don-o
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson