Posted on 08/17/2007 4:00:26 AM PDT by monomaniac
By Peter J. Smith
OCEAN GROVE, New Jersey, August 15, 2007 (LifeSiteNews.com) - A Christian seaside retreat association is suing New Jersey state officials for threatening to prosecute it for rejecting a same-sex couple's bid to hold a civil union ceremony on its property.
The Ocean Grove Camp Meeting Association (OGCMA), an affiliate of the United Methodist Church, filed a federal lawsuit Saturday after the New Jersey Division on Civil Rights continued to investigate whether the Christian organization could face prosecution for violating laws prohibiting discrimination against "sexual orientation."
The Civil Rights Division was investigating the OGCMA for rejecting the request of Harriet Bernstein and Luisa Paster to use the Christian association's boardwalk pavilion for their "civil union" ceremony, which the OGCMA said violated the doctrines and beliefs contained in the UMC's Book of Discipline. The lesbian couple then filed a June 19 complaint with the state attorney general's office demanding "whatever relief is provided by law" including unspecified "compensatory damages for economic loss, humiliation, [and] mental pain." (http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2007/jul/07071011.html)
Represented by the Messina Law Firm, Independence Law Center, and Alliance Defense Fund, the OGCMA asserts in its lawsuit that the attorney general's office is violating First Amendment protections of the rights to free speech, freedom of expressive association, and free exercise of religion.
"Religious groups have the right to make their own decisions without government interference," said Brian Raum, senior legal counsel for the Alliance Defense Fund. "The government can't force a private Christian organization to use its property in a way that would violate its own religious beliefs."
The New Jersey attorney general's office, however, has called the lawsuit "premature", and stated the Civil Rights Division has made no conclusion about the case.
"To date, the Division on Civil Rights has asserted nothing beyond its right to initiate an investigation to determine whether there has been a violation of the law against discrimination," said Lee Moore, a spokesman for the AG.
The New Jersey Law Against Discrimination currently forbids those who "offer goods, services, and facilities to the general public" from "directly or indirectly denying or withholding any accommodation, service, benefit, or privilege to an individual" on the basis of sexual orientation. Under New Jersey's anti-discrimination laws the OGCMA would be subject to prosecution if state officials rule its facilities places of public accommodation.
The suit demands that the court find the law unconstitutional in its application to the OGCMA and recognize the Christian organization's right to use its buildings, facilities, and property "for purposes consistent with its sincerely held religious beliefs." The suit also seeks nominal damages, attorney's fees and costs, and any other just relief.
A copy of the lawsuit filed in the US District Court for the District of New Jersey can be found here: http://www.telladf.org/UserDocs/OceanGroveComplaint.pdf
My point is that you should be able to do just about anything you want as long as you don't infringe the rights or inflict harm on someone else. If the two women are gay, that's fine with me. If the church wishes to deny the ceremony, it would seem to me they have the right to do so, since it is a private organization. Suing for compensatory damages is clearly a crass attempt to extort money from the organization.
What's the state of NJ going to do if a guy approaches the same church and asks to marry a sheep? If would appear that, according to the state's law, he can sue under the same provisions. Stupid.
A rare bright light for the Methodist Church.
Actually, the two are trying to destroy a church that spreads the Gospel of Jesus Christ.
Do you really think so? I think it's a money grab first and second, just trying to make an issue where none really exists.
But I don’t understand this. The “gay rights” supporters around here assure us that things like this don’t happen. All homosexuals want is to be left alone. If we leave them alone they’ll leave us alone and they’ll fully respect the right of religious people to refuse to sanction or provide space for their activities.
This surely can’t be happening. Supporting “gay rights” is a “tolerance” issue that reduces the size and scope of government. All true conservatives should jump on the “gay rights” bandwagon.
(sarcasm off)
I was surprised to see this was United Methodist. The Free Methodists are very, very different.
I think the money is gravy, destruction of the church is the primary goal. The gaystapo will not permit any organization that opposes their agenda to survive.
I suspect it is neither money nor destroying just a single church.
Since there are actually two couples that tried to hold Civil Unions there. This is likely to be a target picked to gain a specific legal precedence. Just as they CHose Massachusetts for a Nationwide effort to pass Gay Marriage. Look for the same here.
ping for later
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.