And the mainstream media will never utter a word of this.
1 posted on
08/17/2007 1:41:17 PM PDT by
wagglebee
To: cgk; cpforlife.org; narses; Coleus; 8mmMauser
2 posted on
08/17/2007 1:42:11 PM PDT by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: 230FMJ; 49th; 50mm; 69ConvertibleFirebird; Aleighanne; Alexander Rubin; An American In Dairyland; ..
3 posted on
08/17/2007 1:42:35 PM PDT by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: wagglebee
Why should they?
A single death from a common medication?
ALL Medicines have a certain amount of risk to certain people...
This is not newsworthy ... unless you have an agenda
5 posted on
08/17/2007 1:53:57 PM PDT by
SubGeniusX
($29.95 Guarantees Your Salvation!!! Or TRIPLE Your Money Back!!!)
To: wagglebee
What? The pill is dangerous to women? Nah! Can’t be. Never happened. (yes, sarcasm)
6 posted on
08/17/2007 1:59:09 PM PDT by
vladimir998
(Ignorance of Scripture is ignorance of Christ. St. Jerome)
To: wagglebee
This is a little mean but the article title sounds like a lead-in to an Irish joke.
7 posted on
08/17/2007 2:00:12 PM PDT by
A Texan
(Oderint dum metuant)
To: wagglebee
Barefoot, pregnant, in the kitchen is the only solution.
8 posted on
08/17/2007 2:02:57 PM PDT by
CholeraJoe
("I shall need the clankers.")
To: Colosis; Black Line; Cucullain; SomeguyfromIreland; Youngblood; Fergal; Cian; col kurz; ...
11 posted on
08/17/2007 2:05:17 PM PDT by
Tax-chick
(Don't like my attitude? Call 1-800-GET-A-DOG.)
To: wagglebee
Because it’s agenda news.
To: wagglebee
although flying, especially economy class, has caused blood clots before, this was not the reason for her death because in such a case the clot would have happened in the plane Not necessarily. I just read recently that the DVT effects of flying can continue for up to a week. The article said you can wear graduated compression hosiery to help counteract this.
18 posted on
08/17/2007 3:39:38 PM PDT by
my_pointy_head_is_sharp
(Do I really want this comment to be seen around the world?)
To: wagglebee
My father developed DVT several weeks after a long drive. Not surprisingly, he was not on the birth control pill.
While the pill certainly could have caused this, it's far from certain that it did. The article, as all I've seen from this source, is obviously ignoring some facts while working an agenda.
To: wagglebee
How was it established that the birth control pill caused death? I did read where
...Julie's father Ray, speaking on behalf of his family-his wife Angela and their two daughters-drew special attention to the fact that the pill was the main factor in the death of his daughter.The father said it was a "fact" that the pill caused the death. How did he establish that as fact?
20 posted on
08/17/2007 4:10:04 PM PDT by
Rudder
To: wagglebee; DonaldC; TightyRighty
One factor not mentioned by the good dr is the possibility of Factor V Lieden. Factor V can create blood clots in Factor V positive individual. A blood test is required to determine if one is positive in one or both genes passed on via genetics.
I wouldn’t have know anything about F-V lieden had it not been discovered in my sis following a surgical procedure. We’re thinking a nephew who died from a clot may have been F-V positive but we’ve no way of knowing now. I was tested and came back positive in one gene. Factor V Lieden is more common in Scandinavian individuals.
To: wagglebee
It is well-known in the medical community that the pill can cause this condition - and it has been well-known for over 20 years.
If anyone is taking the pill and they begin developing migraines - that is a marker for this condition. After my younger daughter was born, I went on the pill and developed migraines within about a month of starting. When I called my doctor (to find out what I could take for the headaches) she told me to stop the pill immediately, and to never plan on going back on it again.
This danger is spelled out in the instruction packet given with each prescription. Anyone taking any medication needs to be fully informed of the risks and the warning signs.
26 posted on
08/17/2007 5:07:39 PM PDT by
SoftballMominVA
(Never argue with an idiot. He will bring you down to his level and beat you with experience)
To: wagglebee; cpforlife.org; Pinkbell; Salvation; narses; All
How dreadful for this to happen!! Prayers for comfort for those mourning her loss.
33 posted on
08/19/2007 6:49:02 PM PDT by
MountainFlower
(There but by the grace of God go I.)
To: wagglebee; Disgusted in Texas; B Knotts; ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton; corbos; NYFreeper; Alexius; ...
+
Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic Ping List:
Add me / Remove me
Please ping me to all note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of interest.
35 posted on
08/19/2007 7:07:48 PM PDT by
narses
(...the spirit of Trent is abroad once more.)
To: wagglebee
From the Catechism of the Catholic Church
(click on the book for the link.)
2399 The regulation of births represents one of the aspects of responsible fatherhood and motherhood. Legitimate intentions on the part of the spouses do not justify recourse to morally unacceptable means (for example, direct sterilization or contraception).
|
2370 Periodic continence, that is, the methods of birth regulation based on self-observation and the use of infertile periods, is in conformity with the objective criteria of morality. These methods respect the bodies of the spouses, encourage tenderness between them, and favor the education of an authentic freedom. In contrast, "every action which, whether in anticipation of the conjugal act, or in its accomplishment, or in the development of its natural consequences, proposes, whether as an end or as a means, to render procreation impossible" is intrinsically evil:
- Thus the innate language that expresses the total reciprocal self-giving of husband and wife is overlaid, through contraception, by an objectively contradictory language, namely, that of not giving oneself totally to the other. This leads not only to a positive refusal to be open to life but also to a falsification of the inner truth of conjugal love, which is called upon to give itself in personal totality. . . . The difference, both anthropological and moral, between contraception and recourse to the rhythm of the cycle . . . involves in the final analysis two irreconcilable concepts of the human person and of human sexuality.
|
38 posted on
08/19/2007 8:39:48 PM PDT by
Salvation
(†With God all things are possible.†)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson