Posted on 08/18/2007 3:25:24 AM PDT by governsleastgovernsbest
Last week, I described Gail Collins' condescension to what she sees as the bumpkins of Middle America. The New York Times columnist is back at it again this morning, suggesting that illegal immigration is not so much a problem as an issue exploited by Republican candidates to stir the passions of gullible Republican rubes.
The jumping-off point for Collins' [p.p.v.] Of Mitt, Monks, and Mowers is the criticism Mitt Romney has levelled at Rudy Giuliani for the latter's embrace of New York's status as a sanctuary city for illegal immigrants when he was Big Apple mayor. Note that Rudy has since toughened his stance, vowing to end illegal immigration.
In Collins' eyes, telling police and others to ignore the fact that people they encountered in the course of their duties were in the country illegally is "a perfectly rational position."
According to Collins:
If youve got hundreds of thousands of undocumented people living in your town, you want them to be willing to report crimes, to go to a doctor if they have a communicable disease, to keep their kids in school and off the street.
Guess what? If police and others were told to report illegals, maybe you wouldn't have "hundreds of thousands" of illegals in your city, with more coming every day knowing there'd be no questions asked.
But for Collins:
Sanctuary city is the new amnesty a right-wing buzzword aimed at freaking out the red state voters. There is, of course, the small side effect of making it utterly impossible to have a rational policy-making discussion about a critical national issue. But what the heck. Were talking Iowa.
What is it with Collins and Iowa? Last week Hawkeye Staters were a bunch of hicks gorging themselves on anything within deep-frying reach. Today they're [to quote Rush] mind-numbed robots, prey to manipulation by cynical politicians. Yeah, why can't Iowans be discerning voters, say like the ones in New York State who elected Eliot Spitzer to clean up government -- by using the state police to spy on political rivals?
Then, in what she admits to being a "cheap shot," Collins, ever the environmentalist, recycles the story of Mitt Romney's contract with a landscaping company that employed illegals. Except that Collins utterly misrepresented the situation, claiming that Romney "hire[d] illegal immigrants." So if the dishwasher in the next fancy restaurant where Collins dines is illegal, she's hired him, too?
Then there's this:
Theres nothing wrong with being worried about the nations porous borders, violent criminals who manage to avoid deportation and the massive number of undocumented people living here without any ties to the community. We should have this discussion. Like it or not, weve got 14 months of presidential campaign to go. Nobody on the voter side wants to spend it listening to politicians shriek meaningless catchphrases.
Translation: Like all good liberals, I don't really care about this issue. But I suppose you redneck nativists have my permission to care -- just not too much. We can have a "discussion." Say, maybe someone can organize a teach-in on campus. I have a friend at La Raza who can speak!
Concludes Collins:
By the way, doesnt the term sanctuary city sound sort of nice, actually? Remember all those sci-fi movies where the heroes were stuck in a terrible world where everybody but them was a mutant or a pod person or a hologram and their only hope was to reach a legendary and possibly mythical refuge? Next time you hear a politician ranting about a sanctuary city, say: Wasnt that where Keanu Reeves was trying to get in The Matrix?
Note that by her analogy, Collins casts the legal citizens of the United States as the mutants and pod persons, while the illegals are the "heroes." Sums up the liberal position nicely.Contact Mark at mark@gunhill.net
Gail Collins positions are certainly what has caused the leap in subscribers to the NYT. They are making money hand over fist. A model for successful economic policies. The support in the populace for her positions are tremendous. Everyone agrees that cities should protect illegal aliens.
It has gone from the “Old Gray Lady” to the “Pathetic Pink Skank”
Not possessing a brain is a requirement for employment at the NYT.
Try Logan's Run. But there was no sanctuary. There was only a robot waiting to kill them.
APf
If this twit’s NYC apartment building is being cleaned by illegal aliens...a sure bet...then she is employing illegal aliens, too.
New York libs like having slave labor because they can hire work that is beneath them. They are too good for mundane chores, having to save the world, doncha know.
Yep....and they can start with themselves.
Iowa? Iowa gave us Tom Harkin, one of the most leftist members of the U.S. Senate. It also has a Democrat governor (Culver) who succeeded a Democrat governor (Vilsack)... what is her problem ?? We can’t ALL live on the Upper West Side.
ping
Collins is an idiot!
"Notwithstanding any other provision of federal, state, or local law, a federal, state, or local government entity or official may not prohibit, or in any way restrict any government entity or official from sending to, or receiving from, the Immigration and Naturalization Service information regarding the citizenship or immigration status, lawful or unlawful, of any individual."
But I guess it's only a law if El Presidente tells the AG to enforce it. And we know how HE feels.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.