Posted on 08/20/2007 8:52:38 AM PDT by Turret Gunner A20
Deported: Church Sanctuary-Seeking Immigration Activist Sent Back to Mexico
LOS ANGELES (AP) - An illegal immigrant who took refuge in a Chicago church for a year to avoid being separated from her U.S.-born son has been deported to Mexico, the church's pastor said.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
She'll be back, and the crap will start all over again.
Shouldn’t that headline read “Repeat Lawbreaker Deported to Mexico”?
Why isn’t this repeat-offending criminal in jail where she belongs?
She’ll be back, and the crap will start all over again.
:::::
But of course. After all, OUR PRESIDENT says “We must treat these people (illegal criminal aliens) WITH RESPECT....”
It’s been a day,she may already be back.
Wow, so every illegal that gets caught and refuses to leave peacefully is now an “activist”?
I love the way that she refers to Mexico as “her country”. Since her allegiance is obviously to Mexico, I have a really hard time understanding why she’s here in the first place.
And shouldn’t it say that she has caused her son trauma by intentionally giving birth to him in the USA instead of MX ?
Giving birth to him here knowing full well what the consequenses might be ?
And what about child endangerment/abandonment ?
She came here and had a baby , used her baby as an international pawn. Even Canada has put a stop to pawn babies.
And why is she threatening the USA ? WHy is she
LOBBYING the USA ? WHy isn’t this phony self-serving
lady lobbying and threatening Mexico ?????
The results look very encouraging! And the response is pretty large (over 8,000).
From what I have heard, the media is all set to start a barrage of these “poor-me-victim” stories.
It is obvious to me this woman is not a good mother. She is not a caring individual, or she would have taken her child with her. She instead left her child behind, so she could come back to the USA and try to cause trouble. She will do nothing in her own country to fight for her fellow citizens, she will come back here only to be deported again. She is a worthless individual, intent on break America’s laws. She should be given ten years, in prison, when she returns. I would love to see a jury trial for this one. I would recommend to the jury we step outside of the sentencing laws and give 100 years, no parole, hard labor, fully chained. Otherwise she will keep popping up, on our side of the border.
Good. Now, the guy running the church she took refuge in should lose his job.
My gut feeling is that a family emergency came up back home in Mexico and she allowed herself to be arrested and deported for the free plane ticket.......
Yes, she will be back because her son is still here........
Should Elvira Arellano have been arrested for breaking U.S. immigration law?
Yes (8812 responses)
91.6%
No (812 responses)
8.4%
9624 total responses
(Results not scientific)
Should a church building provide sanctuary from the law?
Yes (1751 responses)
18.4%
No (7773 responses)
81.6%
9524 total responses
(Results not scientific)
Arellano’s 8-year-old son is a U.S. citizen. Should that make a difference in how her deportation case is handled?
Yes (2415 responses)
25.3%
No (7138 responses)
74.7%
9553 total responses
(Results not scientific)
Regardless of your personal feelings, do you think Arellano’s case will generate so much sympathy and passion among her supporters that she’ll become the Rosa Parks of the immigrant rights movement?
Yes (1718 responses)
18.0%
No (7834 responses)
82.0%
9552 total responses
(Results not scientific)
I agree with the priest who stated our immigration law must be fixed, to keep the family together (parent and anchor baby to be more precise). One must drive thru El Monte, California and will understand. The Mexican breeder will nest in a California city (sanctuary). After the child is born, that’s it! She is sure to stay.
Is this child indeed a US Citizen? I think not, and I am sure there are some US Constitution scholars who are researching the issue. Remember, the parent (only one known) is not legally here, and her own country is claiming jurisdiction over her.
” She instead left her child behind, so she could come back to the USA and try to cause trouble.”
Bingo!
Asta la vista
Minor offspring should be citizens of whatever country the mother is from, no matter where they happen to be born!
she is a convicted fellon and two time illegal alien.
Even with serial immigration with her son at 18, she has to submit an application for waiver of excludability.
The father is listed as unknown. It would just mean fathers who are citizens would be filled in.
In addition keep in mind she could just marry a US citizen to avoid the whole felon excludability thing.
Results after my vote (with the majority in each instance):
Should Elvira Arellano have been arrested for breaking U.S. immigration law?
Yes (9723 responses)
91.4%
No (911 responses)
8.6%
* 10634 total responses
* (Results not scientific)
*
Should a church building provide sanctuary from the law?
Yes (1936 responses)
18.4%
No (8587 responses)
81.6%
* 10523 total responses
* (Results not scientific)
*
Arellano’s 8-year-old son is a U.S. citizen. Should that make a difference in how her deportation case is handled?
Yes (2697 responses)
25.5%
No (7861 responses)
74.5%
* 10558 total responses
* (Results not scientific)
*
Regardless of your personal feelings, do you think Arellano’s case will generate so much sympathy and passion among her supporters that she’ll become the Rosa Parks of the immigrant rights movement?
Yes (1916 responses)
18.2%
No (8639 responses)
81.8%
* 10555 total responses
* (Results not scientific)
Children Services in California should take a GOOD LOOK over this case in regards with “I am the legal guardian” self appointed female who thinks she just jumped in the eye of the mainstream media storm by holding on the child. She is no legal guardian. The child should be removed and placed in the custody of the Children Services. They know better what is in the best interest of the child. And then the “mom” will have a change of heart and stop being the pawn of all these activist organizations, claim her child and be the real loving mom she should be. In Mexico, please!
I wonder if she is waving the Mexican flag while they are deporting her?
Were there any pictures of her actually getting arrested? That’s what I wanna see.
WHAT A GOOD RESOLVE: form a new branch of Children Services to deal only with these anchor babies after their parents abandon them while going back South. Let the States handle this part, and I guarantee when the taxpayers will see the bill the Congress will be forced to change the law regardind the gift of “US Citizenship by birth”.
Get outta here!...and don’t let the door hit you in the a@% on the way out!
We are looking at, let’s see, twenty million of these anchor babies under the age of 18? (1986 Amnesty cutoff)...
Get outta here!...and don’t let the door hit you in the a@% on the way out!
"VIVA MEXICO!": When anti-illegal immigration protesters rallied in front of the Mexican Consulate in Santa Ana, students on recess across the street at the Elementary Arts Academy, climbed their playground equipment and chanted "Viva Mexico!"
May Day 2007
Same reason W. Sutton robbed banks.
Poor Elvira. Not getting much sympathy is she?
I bet Bush tries to pardon her...watch
This is the law on anchor babies:
“The 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution provides that “all persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof are citizens of the United States.”
“These babies, under current interpretation of U.S. law, automatically become U.S. citizens and most qualify immediately for a variety of benefits, including Medicaid. Over time, they can open the door to citizenship to other family members.”
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=law+for+anchor+babies+
Notice this -which is happening full force:
“Over time, they can open the door to citizenship to other family members.”
She’s been deported to Tijuana - she’ll be back in a minute!
My question is - why didn’t they deport her deep into Mexico - so that it would take her a lot of work to get back?
ccording to other posts on this subject, I beleive this “law” was put into effect to cover the offspring of former slaves, not illegal aliens.
That’s true - but - they have obviously used this law for their own use - please see the link I provided and check this one out also:
http://www.theamericanresistance.com/articles/art2005jun22.html
Previous link all about anchor babies and what citizens are doing to change the law - a Constitutional Amendment:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=law+for+anchor+babies+constitutional+amendment+
Curious how she and all her supporters find all this energy to protest a foreign country like the United States but find no time to do the same to the absolute corrupt sh*tbags who run Mexico. Try it honey, maybe you can make a dent in that iron skull of the morons who run your land.
drum roll please......
it’s bush’s fault
It`s true, they all blame it on the U.S. like the U.S. is the rich Daddy who lets his kids starve. But meanwhile the real Daddy, namely the Mexican government, is never held accountable, even though Mexico has every opportunity and every resource in the world to be one of the wealthiest countries on earth.
The problem is corruption, and the Mexican people just don`t want to confront those few sh*tbags who are lining their pockets at every corner. Put it this way; Bill Gates is no longer the richest man on earth. It`s now a Mexican named Carlos Slim Helu. A MEXICAN is the richest man ON EARTH!
Okay, we are missing some important details here: (1) what insurance did she or the child’s father have or purchase to pay for the prenatal care and delivery, (2) what insurance has she used to pay for the child’s healthcare for the past 8 years?, how many times has she attempted through legal means to become a citizen? My guess is zero on all counts. I think this argument is ridiculous. I believe that the US should have tougher immigration laws like Canada that require skills or sponsership before you are eligible for citizenship
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.