I don't know about those chronic complainers from GEICO, but this may explain why Rupert Grint is so popular.
1 posted on
08/23/2007 2:32:09 PM PDT by
jmcenanly
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40 next last
To: jmcenanly
Brad Pitt looks like a wimp to me - just not attractive.
2 posted on
08/23/2007 2:34:49 PM PDT by
Dante3
To: jmcenanly
Uh...not me..
3 posted on
08/23/2007 2:36:44 PM PDT by
Lucky9teen
(Those that fail to learn from history, are doomed to repeat it.)
To: jmcenanly
I don’t think it’s the LOOK that is what women like, it’s the promise of that rough around the edges looking guy being a little more aggressive in bed, a good solid romp, compared to the “Nancey boy”, and the “touchy feely” tender little “poke”.
women like SEX, not a tea party.
To: jmcenanly
I thought just last month there was a study that suggested that women prefer girlie-looking metrosexuals...?
To: jmcenanly
Guys with bulldog-like faces have been chick magnets throughout human evolutionary history. I've actually heard some gals talking about some ugly guys being attractive.
Their terms were "ugly-sexy" as oppsed to just "ugly-ugly".
Lady FReepers, is there any truth to this?
6 posted on
08/23/2007 2:37:47 PM PDT by
SIDENET
(More fun than a beer left in the freezer.)
To: jmcenanly
I thought a recent study found that women found attractive men who looked like women. Does this mean that cavemen looked like women?
11 posted on
08/23/2007 2:41:03 PM PDT by
aruanan
To: jmcenanly
12 posted on
08/23/2007 2:42:17 PM PDT by
Jaysun
(It's outlandishly inappropriate to suggest that I'm wrong.)
To: jmcenanly
13 posted on
08/23/2007 2:42:42 PM PDT by
GunRunner
(Come on Fred, how long are you going to wait?)
To: jmcenanly
ok ladies feast your eyes on this hot stud:
14 posted on
08/23/2007 2:43:20 PM PDT by
ari-freedom
(I am for traditional moral values, a strong national defense, and free markets.)
To: jmcenanly
If you believe in “studies,” you will believe in anything.
15 posted on
08/23/2007 2:43:46 PM PDT by
mojito
To: jmcenanly
Something about Will Smith’s face makes it hard for me to take him serious in movies. I think it’s cause he looks so goofy with those big ears and all.
23 posted on
08/23/2007 2:48:15 PM PDT by
Jorge
To: jmcenanly
24 posted on
08/23/2007 2:48:47 PM PDT by
Liberty Valance
(Keep a simple manner for a happy life :o)
To: jmcenanly
28 posted on
08/23/2007 2:53:34 PM PDT by
COBOL2Java
(If Barbie is so popular, why do you have to buy her friends?)
To: jmcenanly
29 posted on
08/23/2007 2:53:49 PM PDT by
Liberty Valance
(Keep a simple manner for a happy life :o)
To: EveningStar; JRios1968
31 posted on
08/23/2007 2:57:13 PM PDT by
BJClinton
(And then it occured to me: a real rocket scientist posted the Friday silliness thread on Thursday.)
To: jmcenanly
"...but this may explain why Rupert Grint is so popular."Three questions:
1. Who the hell is Rupert Grint?
2. Are those two pictures of the same person?
3. Is either one (or both) the aforementioned Grint?
Seriously, I've never even heard that name before and I'm sure I would have remembered someone that homely.
33 posted on
08/23/2007 3:01:31 PM PDT by
Pablo64
(Ask me about my alpacas!)
To: jmcenanly
In other words, Paul Begala is still a virgin.
34 posted on
08/23/2007 3:02:04 PM PDT by
domenad
(In all things, in all ways, at all times, let honor guide me.)
To: al baby; Allegra; Auntbee; BJClinton; Dashing Dasher; dfwddr; exile; feinswinesuksass; ...
The "tards" are the ping list members - not necessarily the subject of the thread.
To: jmcenanly
41 posted on
08/23/2007 3:07:25 PM PDT by
dragonblustar
(Fallacies do not cease to be fallacies because they become fashions - G. K. Chesterton)
To: jmcenanly
It’s always amusing to hear men elaborate on “what women want.” Since women themselves don’t know, it would be a rare man indeed who did. And I would hazard a guess that it’s none of US.
43 posted on
08/23/2007 3:08:49 PM PDT by
IronJack
(=)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
