Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: robertpaulsen

“The second amendment has nothing whatsoever to do with state laws.”

I assume then that you would have no problem with a state, say California, deciding that medicinal marijuana is legal and the Feds should have nothing to say about it.

Or does this only work for issues you are in favor of?


56 posted on 08/24/2007 3:16:18 PM PDT by EEDUDE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: EEDUDE
"I assume then that you would have no problem with a state, say California, deciding that medicinal marijuana is legal and the Feds should have nothing to say about it."

Correct. Unless a federal law to the contrary exists, which it does. When that happens, federal law trumps state law (according to Article VI, Section 2 of the U.S.Constitution).

The State of Illinois has home rule, meaning that a city like Chicago may pass laws affecting only their jurisdiction, as long as those laws don't violate the state constitution (or, of course, the U.S. Constitution or federal law).

70 posted on 08/24/2007 4:07:36 PM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson