Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hillary's running mate race: Sen. Dodd and Gov. Richardson are possibilities
Townhall.com ^ | August 25, 2007 | Dick Morris and Eileen McGann

Posted on 08/25/2007 2:38:28 AM PDT by Kaslin

Democrats are increasingly giving evidence that they seem to feel that they have already held their primaries and nominated the former first lady. Neither national debates nor Obama’s increasingly assertive foreign policy proposals seem to weaken her hold on the nomination. Even Edwards’ vocal and effective criticisms of Clinton's ties to special interests appear to do nothing to cut into her lead. Instead, it just keeps on growing.

Have the Democrats, in their hearts, anointed Clinton as their candidate already? Do they regard the criticisms of her fellow candidates as just fissures in a party they are determined to keep united and focused on the objective of defeating President Bush? Are they rallying around their standard-bearer a year before she is awarded their standard?

The Democratic desire to bring the Bush administration to an end and their desperation to terminate the war in Iraq is so polarizing the electoral process that there seems to be little room for primaries anymore. The notion that Democrats compete against one another to find out, at best, who would be a good president and, at worst, which would be most likely to win, seems to becoming increasingly passé. In a sense, the entire primary process, which has dominated presidential selection since 1972, appears to be losing its grip in the face of a determination to rally around the candidate, even if she be anointed, in the first instance, by the established leaders of the party, meeting, these days, in a smoke-free environment to make their choice.

Behind these developments lies a fundamental fact: Hillary has used the last six months, with their ups and downs, to solidify her claim to the Democratic nomination. Repairing her shortcomings in the early primary states, she has now moved out ahead of Edwards in Iowa and added to her lead in New Hampshire and South Carolina. Nationally, she has added about a point each month to her vote share, moving from an average daily rating in the Rasmussen tracking poll of 34 percent in March to 40 percent this month, an amazing vote share in an eight way field of candidates.

As Hillary tightens her grip on the Democratic nomination, it is increasingly evident that Sen. Chris Dodd and Gov. Bill Richardson are using the presidential race to audition for the job of vice president on a Clinton ticket. In recent Democratic debates, Dodd and Richardson have taken shots at Senator Barack Obama, picking up the Hillary campaign mantra that the Illinois senator is too short of experience to “hit the ground running” as Hillary is fond of saying she is able to do.

Memorably, Dodd turned to Obama during a recent debate and intoned that “you can’t learn this job on January 21,” meaning that his colleague lacked the experience and on-the-job knowledge required to become the next president. Why would Dodd bother to attack Obama, the second place challenger, who is, in no way, a threat to the Connecticut senator’s fifth place standing? To audition with the lady down the stage, to apply for the job of her attack dog when the general election gets underway.

In his own way, Richardson is auditioning, too. Running ads in the early primary states, he is able to boast a strong vote share in Iowa and seems to be moving into a convincing fourth place in the national polls, behind Hillary, Obama, and Edwards. Richardson could be a strong candidate for vice president. In a campaign based on expanding the electorate to include previously unheard of numbers of single women, blacks, and Latinos, the Hillary campaign could well use a minority in its No. 2 slot. For his part, Richardson appears to be grooming himself for the spot by joining Dodd in attacking Obama for a lack of experience.

Perhaps the early loading of the primaries, and the consequent move of the nomination process forward into the first half of 2007 is carrying with it a corollary: The race may already be over.


TOPICS: Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: hillary; hillaryveep
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last
While there is a great possibility that Hillary will get the nomination, the left is already counting that they have the White House already in the basket
1 posted on 08/25/2007 2:38:30 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

From toe-sucker’s mouth to God’s ear. We will beat Hillary like a rented mule.


2 posted on 08/25/2007 2:44:47 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (Cuius testiculos habeas, habeas cardia et cerebellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

What would Dodd bring to the table? Hillary will not need him to carry Dodd’s state. On the other hand, NM was one of two states that switched from Gore in 2000 into Bush in 2004.


3 posted on 08/25/2007 2:48:15 AM PDT by paudio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

As I’ve said for a long time now, it will be Richardson.


4 posted on 08/25/2007 2:52:59 AM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (~~~Jihad Fever -- Catch It !~~~ (Backup tag: "Live Fred or Die"))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
If anyone can wake us out of our lethargy, Hillary can.
5 posted on 08/25/2007 2:56:41 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (BTUs are my Beat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

If I was the Dems I’d want someone younger then Richardson.. even though he seems a natural choice for them. Hes already 59, so he’ll be at least 60 by the election next year.. And that would mean 68 years old if he were to get a chance to run for President.

Obama is only 46, so that would make him 55ish for his next shot in a Hillary presidency if he were vp.


6 posted on 08/25/2007 3:00:59 AM PDT by ran20
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Good that means they will get cocky and pretentous. Maybe they will even say what “great” Socialist laws they will pass. They probably are getting overly optomistic with Chavez actions. It will be interesting to see who Sean Penn backs (recent Chavez guest).


7 posted on 08/25/2007 3:05:36 AM PDT by marty60
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Have the Democrats, in their hearts, anointed Clinton as their candidate already?

Yes.

And those who seem so sure that she can be whupped easily are asked to recall how she was going to be whupped easily by a young, attractive family man who was a REAL New Yorker, not a carpetbagger who went on a ridiculous listening tour.

Richardson and Dodd are two vile doughy men who are the perfect examples of how dems like their "men"--round as Pillsbury dough boys and easily whipped into order, asking only to be given some power so they can feel masculine.

Blech, what a bunch!

8 posted on 08/25/2007 3:09:18 AM PDT by Darkwolf377 (Atheist pro-lifer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

If it is Richardson. just keep playing the film of him being led around by the North Koreans on a tour of the U.S.S. Pueblo
like a sap.

He has been a Clinton butt boy for ever.


9 posted on 08/25/2007 3:19:00 AM PDT by Joe Boucher (An enemy of Islam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
From toe-sucker’s mouth to God’s ear. We will beat Hillary like a rented mule.>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

She will be rode hard and put up wet.It matters little which whussy pipped running mate she has.

If Rudy doesn’t get the Republican Nomnation, who will?

Well that depends on what happens with the conservative base of the Republican party over the next 6 months. I think that Thompson and Hunter will give Rudy his walkin' papers.

I hardly believe the polls. They always have been wrong in the past, and essentially are propaganda designed to protect the investments made by big money in the annointed candidate. The annointed candidates do not always win, because there is a high degree of unpredictability in what might happen in the run up to the convention.

And this time there is even a higher than usual unpredictibility factor, because of the split between the RINO faction ( the RNC annointed) and the conservative base that won the last presidential election in 2004, only to find that the RNC dumped the agenda that Congress had been mandated by the electorate.

We won't know until the second night of the convention who the front runners will be. And who they are depends on how the conservative wing of the Republican party swings. If they swing in unison, it will be Thompson /Hunter. If the conservative wing remains divided, it will be Romney/Paul.

I doubt that the convention will take the candidacy of Giulliani seriously, simply because he has too many liabilities as a presidential candidate, and he cannot overcome them, even with the nod from the RNC big wigs, who obviously think he is the best the party has, they certainly wanted him to name his mafia connected Homeland Security nominee to the highest security position in our nation. Would he been better than Chertoff? Well anyone would be, but we don't need mafia hit men doing the CIAs dirty work that the Clintonistas inside the CIA have kept them from doing.

I do not trust the RNC, after what they did with Tom DeLay, and the 5 RINOs whom they supported to derail the conservative agenda from the House, by having those 5 Republican Senators defuse the nuclear option of cutting off filibusters by the Dems on the issue of Supreme COurt appointments. The Dems successfully blocked many conservative judges from the federeal system. That sucks.

I do not trust the RNC in their support of the Illegal Alien Amnesty Bill.Neither do most Republican delegates.

So the question is simply this, "Will the Republican grass roots take back their party?" I am betting they will, simply because too much of the future of our country is riding on it. They must.

And if they do, Giulliani does not stand a snowball's chance in hail of getting nominated. Hunter and Thompson do.

The end game for the Republican candidates is taking shape. The convention won't be pretty, but it will be democracy in action. The delegates are already planning their strategy to take back the Republican party, and Tom DeLay is very active in the back ground on doing just that. May God speed his course.

I will keep rooting for Duncan Hunter. He is the best man for the job, and the best equipped to duke it out with the Dem nominee, who will NOT be Hillary Clinton. The left do not trust her, nor do moderate Democrats. The Dems are scrambling to silence the left, and trying to reposition themselves away from their traitorous Iraq policy, for they know it will lose them the next election, and it may already be too late for them to reposition themselves , as moonbats like Cindy Sheheen keep the left alive in the public eye.

Who ever Joe Leiberman supports will likely get the Dem nomination, and that sure as hail won't be Hillary. Joe does not like her after what she did to him in Nov of 2006 in the run up to the Connecticut election for Senator. Joe won, which goes to show you that there is a bedrock of Dem moderates who control the Dem party. The left does not and have now failed at their bid to control the Democrat party. Just as there is a struggle for the heart and soul of the Republican party, so there is also for the Dems, and the moderates have it still. Their convention will be a mess, either a rigidly controlled continuall scripted robo event, or a blood bath with Michael Moore and Howard Deaniac swinging from the chandeliers.

We WILL beat Hillary like a rented mule if she is nominated, but I don't think she will be.

10 posted on 08/25/2007 3:19:22 AM PDT by Candor7 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Baghdad_(1258))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377
I personally believe we got our Swift tactic from the bwitch, herself.

The nation MUST be saturated with it's own words.

Thanx to thebattman ... and

againsthillary.

11 posted on 08/25/2007 3:24:25 AM PDT by knarf (I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377

Blech, what a bunch!

statesmen one and all

BWAHHAHAAHAHHAHA


12 posted on 08/25/2007 3:29:24 AM PDT by flat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Candor7
I think that Thompson and Hunter will give Rudy his walkin' papers.

I think I said here months ago that the media would be the ones who destroy Rudy, and we've been seeing glimpses of that. It's going to get a lot worse.

Rudy is to the 2008 Republicans what Dean was to the 2004 Democrats. Looking good at first, and then it's crash and burn.
13 posted on 08/25/2007 3:32:47 AM PDT by callofduty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: paudio
What would Dodd bring to the table?

Hillary will appear more manly and competent when they appear together.

14 posted on 08/25/2007 3:33:00 AM PDT by Caipirabob (Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: knarf

You’re so wrong—unborn babies aren’t invisible to Hillary. She considers killing them a sacrament, the bloodthirsty lib death-priestess.


15 posted on 08/25/2007 3:34:29 AM PDT by Darkwolf377 (Atheist pro-lifer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: flat
statesmen one and all

I mean, seriously, is this a joke? George Washington would look at this bunch and say "What the heck did I bother for?"

16 posted on 08/25/2007 3:35:48 AM PDT by Darkwolf377 (Atheist pro-lifer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: callofduty
Rudy would make a good Commerce Secretary, going up against the Chinese. But thats as far as his history and talent will take him.

He's done. But then he might decide stupidly to run as an independent, which would ba a disaster. I don't think he will, because he will be given a cabinet position. Maybe Attorney General or Sec. Commerce.

17 posted on 08/25/2007 3:36:48 AM PDT by Candor7 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Baghdad_(1258))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Candor7
he will be given a cabinet position. Maybe Attorney General or Sec. Commerce.

No matter which party takes the White House.

18 posted on 08/25/2007 3:47:14 AM PDT by Darkwolf377 (Atheist pro-lifer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377
I agree, wolf ... but the masses are not aware of that particular understanding ... they're graphically oriented.

I think THAT should be our angle.

19 posted on 08/25/2007 3:47:44 AM PDT by knarf (I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj
As I’ve said for a long time now, it will be Richardson.

Si se puede...

20 posted on 08/25/2007 4:01:30 AM PDT by johnny7 ("But that one on the far left... he had crazy eyes")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson