Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

India launches contest for 126 new fighters with RFP release
Flightglobal.com ^ | 28/08/07 | Craig Hoyle

Posted on 08/28/2007 8:33:55 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki

India launches contest for 126 new fighters with RFP release

By Craig Hoyle

India has at last issued its eagerly awaited request for proposals for a new fleet of 126 lightweight fighters, launching a battle between the Boeing F/A-18E/F Super Hornet, Dassault Rafale, Eurofighter Typhoon, Lockheed Martin F-16, RSK MiG-35 and Saab Gripen.

Weighing in at 211 pages, the long-delayed document was issued to potential bidders in New Delhi on 28 August, and outlines requirements in areas including technology transfer, licenced manufacturing and through-life support arrangements. Further details of the project, such as its delivery schedule, have not been publicly released by the Indian defence ministry.

India’s defence acquisition council in late June approved the medium multi-role combat aircraft RFP for release, but the latest development has nonetheless caught manufacturers by surprise. New Delhi’s expected $10.2 billion contest has been in the planning phase for the last few years, and several previous RFP release targets have passed without event. Bidders are to submit technical responses by 3 March 2008, and New Delhi will issue a shortlist after conducting extensive technical and field evaluations of the candidate aircraft.

Required to replace the Indian air force’s MiG-21 interceptors, the new multirole aircraft will operate beneath the service’s Sukhoi Su-30MKI fighters. Full details of the new requirement are expected to emerge within the next few days, but these are known to include an initial batch of 18 aircraft to be built abroad, with the remainder to be manufactured in partnership with India’s Hindustan Aeronautics as part of a 50% offset deal to be linked to the purchase.

Described by manufacturers as the key fighter contest for the next few years, the Indian requirement could yet take on even greater importance, with recent unconfirmed reports having suggested that lengthy delays to the MiG-21 replacement effort could lead New Delhi to eventually expand the size of its fleet to around 200 aircraft.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aerospace; airforce; iaf; india
Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

Indian Mig-21 Bison

1 posted on 08/28/2007 8:33:57 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Maybe instead of perpetuating their status as a third world hell hole with all the latest whiz-bang military toys, they should perhaps build a few sewer systems or water treatment plants for a change.


2 posted on 08/28/2007 8:46:57 AM PDT by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SpaceBar

& you assume that all the money saved from military spending will go into welfare???


3 posted on 08/28/2007 8:52:17 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Who said anything about welfare? I suggested normal infrastructure.


4 posted on 08/28/2007 8:54:04 AM PDT by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SpaceBar

Whatever-do you think it will necessarily go into that???


5 posted on 08/28/2007 8:54:36 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SpaceBar

It’s a trade-off. One would be a complete idiot to concentrate all resources on a sewer system while leaving an already-tense and contested border with countries that are rapidly upgrading their stike capabilities(lookup China and its borders), vulnerable.

Asia ain’t North America.


6 posted on 08/28/2007 9:14:04 AM PDT by CarrotAndStick (The articles posted by me needn't necessarily reflect my opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CarrotAndStick; SpaceBar

Not to mention that if 1 dollar is allocated for infrastructure & welfare in places like India,20 cents actually find their way to the project.Defense expenditure is far more closely monitored.


7 posted on 08/28/2007 9:16:28 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki; SpaceBar

INDIA

Military expenditures - percent of GDP:

2.5% of total GDP (2006)

Source: CIA, The World Factbook.

https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/in.html

2.5% isn’t really that bad a price to pay, for minimal security, in a region still in conflict.


8 posted on 08/28/2007 9:28:40 AM PDT by CarrotAndStick (The articles posted by me needn't necessarily reflect my opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: CarrotAndStick
I hope 126 new fighters is enough! India is a more natural ally than many of the other countries in the region and want them to be very strong militarily and a very good friend of the US.

Here's a nightmare scenario for you. If for some reason the islamic radicals inside Pakistan are able to take control of that country's government, they will have access to nukes and a nuclear capable taliban or al queda is not what the world needs. India no doubt would be one of the first targets; we soon after.

9 posted on 08/28/2007 10:29:40 AM PDT by GBA ( God Bless America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: GBA

126 may not be enough after all.This figure was first put it in 1999 & was slated as massive buy of French Mirage-2000 5 jets as replacement for the Mig-21 & Mig-23s.Given the delays in the Indian LCA project as well as the slow pace of this purchase,the number will probably be jacked upto about 180-200 aircraft to cover for the retirement of Mig-27 & early Jaguar fighters.It also makes political sense too as more numbers means that a 2 aircraft buy seem possible.


10 posted on 08/28/2007 11:18:07 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SpaceBar

You could then say that the US should build better bridges and levies instead of buying more F/A-22 raptors. The argument doesnt hold. You need both ..to defend yourself and to improve infrastructure. Not either/Or.


11 posted on 08/28/2007 12:28:22 PM PDT by Arjun (Skepticism is good. It keeps you alive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SpaceBar
There is nothing wrong with sewer systems and water treatment plants, but to not invest any funds into national security would be pure folly. Particularly when your neighbors include China (which is rapidly militarising and views India as one of its largest regional potential threats) and Pakistan (which is probably the most neurotic nation on Earth, is nuclear armed, is essentially a Chinese puppet, and has been in several wars with India).

All the sewer systems and water treatment plants will not make China and Pakistan hold hands with India and sing kumbaya.

12 posted on 08/29/2007 9:19:11 PM PDT by spetznaz (Nuclear-tipped Ballistic Missiles: The Ultimate Phallic Symbol)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson